Skip to comments.
Libby trial update [FBI interviewer's notes inaccurate and omit important parts of Libby testimony]
American Thinker ^
| Feb 5, 2007
| Clarice Feldman
Posted on 02/05/2007 12:06:04 PM PST by John Jorsett
The Libby trial continues today with FBI agent Bond acknowledging that her notes are inaccurate and that the summary of the second interview prepared by her supervisor Eckenrode is substantially at odds with her notes.
She also said that while Libby said he "couldn't recall" a key conversation, for example, Eckenrode reported that Libby "adamantly denied "it occurred.
Imagine how confusing it must have been to be confronted in the grand jury with these notes falsely describing the interviews and having no means to challenge them!
Significantly, Agent Bond confirms: Libby testified that on 9/30/03, Colin Powell told him that "everyone knows" about Wilson's wife, and that he (Wilson) was at the meeting where Wilson's wife suggested they send Wilson to Niger.
TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: agentbond; bond; cialink; eckenrode; fbicrimes; joewilson; scooterlibby
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-48 next last
Click on the
agent Bond link and read additional details of her testimony, including omission of important parts of the interview. What really strikes me is the FBI policy of using hand notes instead of recording devices. Seeing what a mess this has become, if I'm ever interviewed by the FBI I'm bringing my own tape recorder!
To: John Jorsett
What kind of idiot prosecutor would bring this kind of evidence to a court of law.
2
posted on
02/05/2007 12:11:31 PM PST
by
sgtbono2002
(I will forgive Jane Fonda, when the Jews forgive Hitler.)
To: John Jorsett
What really strikes me is the FBI policy of using hand notes instead of recording devices.Policy? Gee whiz, get yourself some 20th century technology, guys.
3
posted on
02/05/2007 12:13:14 PM PST
by
siunevada
(If we learn nothing from history, what's the point of having one? - Peggy Hill)
To: STARWISE; Howlin
4
posted on
02/05/2007 12:14:54 PM PST
by
Txsleuth
(We only need a "Victory Resolution".)
To: sgtbono2002
Imagine how confusing it must have been to be confronted in the grand jury with these notes falsely describing the interviews and having no means to challenge them! No hill for high-steppin' FitzFong.
HF
5
posted on
02/05/2007 12:15:33 PM PST
by
holden
To: sgtbono2002
Political prosecutors always look like idiots about the law because this trial is not about the law, its about PR.
Bad press for the Bush Admin is the only goal.
To: holdonnow; mware; Mo1; Bahbah
7
posted on
02/05/2007 12:22:29 PM PST
by
AliVeritas
(Stop Global Dhimming. Demand testicular fortitude from the hill. Call the crusade.)
To: sgtbono2002
Someone with an "Irish" sounding name - NITgerald, WITgerald or something like that.
8
posted on
02/05/2007 12:26:50 PM PST
by
hgro
To: John Jorsett
To: sgtbono2002
More importantly, what kind of idiot judge would allow it.
To: sgtbono2002
More importantly, what kind of idiot judge would allow it.
To: sgtbono2002
More importantly, what kind of idiot judge would allow it.
To: sgtbono2002
More importantly, what kind of idiot judge would allow it.
To: sgtbono2002
More importantly, what kind of idiot judge would allow it.
To: sgtbono2002
"What kind of idiot prosecutor would bring this kind of evidence to a court of law."
One with an agenda.
You actually beat me to the punch with your comment. I was going to comment that as each prosecution witness is discredited, I'm beginning to wonder how Fitzgerald ever made it through law school.
15
posted on
02/05/2007 12:43:15 PM PST
by
mass55th
(Courage is being scared to death - but saddling up anyway~~John Wayne)
To: AliVeritas
while Libby said he "couldn't recall" a key conversation, for example, Eckenrode reported that Libby "adamantly denied "it occurredIt looks like Fitzfong and some FBI agents should be the ones on trial.
16
posted on
02/05/2007 12:47:26 PM PST
by
Bahbah
(.Regev, Goldwasser & Shalit, we are praying for you.)
To: magoo70804
Please move your selector switch to the semi-auto position. :-)
17
posted on
02/05/2007 12:48:54 PM PST
by
KarlInOhio
(Samoans: The (low) wage slaves in the Pelosi-Starkist complex.)
To: John Jorsett
"Imagine how confusing it must have been to be confronted in the grand jury with these notes falsely describing the interviews and having no means to challenge them!"
This is a major flaw with the Grand Jury system. You, the accused, are hammered with any number of accusations and don't have the usual courtesies (as guaranteed by that inconvenient shred of paper, the Constitution), such as an attorney and due process, to shield you from prosecutoral "inaccuracy" or overreaching. Of course, it's not a "trial"... it's just the end of life as you know it.
To: mass55th
I am far from being a lawyer (Thank God) but everything I have been told says a Lawyer shouldnt ask any question he doesnt know the answer to.
This clown doesnt even know what his own prosecution witnesses will say. Didnt he interview them in any way previous to placing them on the stand?
God only knows how much money this turkey has been allowed to throw down the toilet. Certainly someone should ask and find out why? He is as totally incopmpetent as Starr was.
19
posted on
02/05/2007 1:04:51 PM PST
by
sgtbono2002
(I will forgive Jane Fonda, when the Jews forgive Hitler.)
To: hgro
He must have studied law with Teddy Kennedy.
20
posted on
02/05/2007 1:06:37 PM PST
by
sgtbono2002
(I will forgive Jane Fonda, when the Jews forgive Hitler.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-48 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson