Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Russia to unveil latest fighter MiG-35 at Bangalore air show
IRNA ^ | 2/307

Posted on 02/03/2007 8:08:29 PM PST by TexKat

Russia's latest version of fighter aircraft, the MiG-35, will be unveiled at next week's air show in Bangalore amid Moscow's keen interest to sell these planes to India.

The MiG-35 fighters, top-of-the-line multi-role aircraft, will be on display along with the most sophisticated jets from the US, including the F-18 and F-16, and those from other countries at the five-day Aero-India International Defence show beginning next week in Bangalore, capital of Karnataka state.

"It will be for the first time that the final version of MiG-35 fighter will be displayed," PTI reported here quoting an official of the Russian embassy.

So far, only the prototype of the MiG-35 has been shown to the public at air shows in Russia and Britain in 2005.

The aircraft, based on MiG-29M fighter jets, is a significant improvement in manoeuvrability, flight range and weapons system.

Full technical specifications of the fighter will be shown at the Bangalore air base on February 6, on the eve of the air show.

The fighter is powered by RD-33 OVT thrust vectoring control engines, which helps in enhanced performance of the plane in close air-to-air engagements.

Significantly, India and Russia signed an agreement more than a week ago under which RD-33 series of engines will be manufactured here by Hindustan Aeronautics Limited.

MiG-35 will be among the various other fighters to be displayed by Russia during the air show.

Russia, a traditional partner of India in the defence field, is keen to sell its fighters here in view of New Delhi's proposal to purchase 126 fighter aircraft.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government
KEYWORDS: aerospace; aircraft; india; mig35; raptorbait; russia; soviet; space
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101 next last
To: TexKat

It actually makes sense for India to buy the Mig-35 since the pilots are already familiar with mig-29 and India will also be manufacturing the engine anyways. Besides the Mig-29k will be operational on the new carrier they will acquire in a year or 2... Adm Gorshkov.


21 posted on 02/03/2007 8:40:50 PM PST by Arjun (Skepticism is good. It keeps you alive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arjun

Do we know what price Russia wants per MiG-35 copy yet?


22 posted on 02/03/2007 8:49:00 PM PST by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: JRios1968

Krasny Oktyabr.


23 posted on 02/03/2007 8:52:56 PM PST by Still Thinking (Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: padre35

The time we would even get in a dogfight now is , in case by accident our plane and theirs get in close contact, but, yes, it's a thing of the passed.


24 posted on 02/03/2007 8:53:58 PM PST by Prophet in the wilderness (PSALM 53 : 1 The FOOL hath said in his heart , There is no GOD .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: padre35

Actually, no dogfighting is not a thing of the past.

There was a lengthy article in Avaiation and Space Weekly about the exercises held recently up in Alaska, utilizing F22's in large numbers for the first time both attacking and defending.

An F22 got a gun kill in the exercises. Stealthily, it crept up behind it and shot it down with its gun.


25 posted on 02/03/2007 8:57:47 PM PST by rlmorel (Islamofacism: It is all fun and games until someone puts an eye out. Or chops off a head.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: padre35

Dogfights are mostly a thing of the past, why bother?

That line of thinking got us in trouble over the skies of North Vietnam. We did learn that hard lesson - put guns back on the fighters instead of relying solely on missiles.


26 posted on 02/03/2007 8:58:40 PM PST by Fred Hayek (Liberalism is a mental disorder)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Fred Hayek

Ya picked a great screen name!


27 posted on 02/03/2007 9:00:07 PM PST by rlmorel (Islamofacism: It is all fun and games until someone puts an eye out. Or chops off a head.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: operation clinton cleanup

"Hmmm... that looks familiar.

Looks like almost a copy of the MIG-35.


28 posted on 02/03/2007 9:03:26 PM PST by baubau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: neodad

"B-70"

I was thinking the same thing.


29 posted on 02/03/2007 9:08:08 PM PST by VietVet (I am old enough to know who I am and what I believe, and I 'm not inclined to apologize for any of)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Prophet in the wilderness

It's a thing for dead people??


30 posted on 02/03/2007 9:09:29 PM PST by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man
Didn't Clint Eastwood steal one of these back in the 80's?

The Firefox was a "MiG-31," not a 35.

31 posted on 02/03/2007 9:14:53 PM PST by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative; All
I don't know about you but I suspect you might agree, and that is a mistake to a look at every airplane as being built as a F22 adversary.

And also, we cannot be absolutely sure Ivan has not figured out the chink in stealth, which might not eliminate stealth advantage but diminish it to a degree where it is not the trump card.

Agree?
32 posted on 02/03/2007 9:29:29 PM PST by RunningWolf (2-1 Cav 1975)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative
It does not seem that the Russkies are all to alarmed by by stealth capability.

Remember Stalins reaction to Truman's news of his super weapon during the Potsdam conference.
33 posted on 02/03/2007 9:33:07 PM PST by RunningWolf (2-1 Cav 1975)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Southack

"Do we know what price Russia wants per MiG-35 copy yet?"
No we dont. But we can make an educated guess based on the Gorshkov contract signed in 2004. That deal was for 16 Mig-29K fighters costing $700-800m so the average cost works out to be $45-50m. Add another 10-15% for inflation and we have roughly 55m per aircraft which fits within India's budget of $7-8 billion for 126 aircraft.



34 posted on 02/03/2007 9:34:45 PM PST by Arjun (Skepticism is good. It keeps you alive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Fred Hayek



That line of thinking got us in trouble over the skies of North Vietnam. We did learn that hard lesson - put guns back on the fighters instead of relying solely on missiles.

You'll get no argument from me on that one, to not have cannon on a air frame is not wise at all.

What I am suggesting is that to build a modern plane with the thought that "This is a great dogfighter only" is not wise.


35 posted on 02/03/2007 9:37:54 PM PST by padre35 (I am from the "let's stop eating our own" wing of the Republican Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative
"The Mig-35 still doesn't have the stealth and supercruise features built into the F-22."

The F-22 could kill half a dozen Mig 35s before they ever knew he was there.
36 posted on 02/03/2007 9:40:41 PM PST by RavenATB (Patton was right...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: padre35

Yes it is sort of like sending a guy out into combat carrying an M16 that is missing the bayonet/combat knife etc.

Most of the time it is just weight, but if/when they need it, they need it real bad.


37 posted on 02/03/2007 9:43:05 PM PST by RunningWolf (2-1 Cav 1975)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: RunningWolf

Remember Stalins reaction to Truman's news of his super weapon during the Potsdam conference.

That was due to Stalin already knowing about it (Thank you very much Rosenbergs and Harry Hopkins).
Now an engineer has recently been arrested for selling secrets on the B-2.


38 posted on 02/03/2007 9:45:43 PM PST by Fred Hayek (Liberalism is a mental disorder)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Fred Hayek
From what I read, he had data on only one area of the B2 regarding the jet exhaust/heat signature (I hope)
39 posted on 02/03/2007 9:49:19 PM PST by RunningWolf (2-1 Cav 1975)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: RunningWolf; Fred Hayek; RavenATB
From what I read, he had data on only one area of the B2 regarding the jet exhaust/heat signature (I hope)

But I doubt that's the only spy the the Chinese have infiltrated into the stealth aircraft programs. The Soviets had two entirely separate spy rigns infiltrate the Manhattan project.

40 posted on 02/03/2007 10:05:57 PM PST by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson