Posted on 02/03/2007 8:00:35 AM PST by Valin
You have to give Russ Feingold credit - hes a man of his convictions. Its true that those convictions are misguided and borderline insane, but at least he has the courage to follow them.
In his latest outing as the Democrats Lone Ranger, Feingold has audaciously proposed legislation that will use Congress power of the purse to compel an immediate redeployment from Iraq. Its an idea so radical, it actually makes Ted Kennedy fidget. Given that the physical act of fidgeting likely taxes Ted Kennedys aerobic capacity, you can be pretty sure that Feingolds proposed legislation is way outside the political mainstream.
But again, lets give credit where its due. Feingold has proposed a piece of actual legislation, not a mere resolution or a completely pointless non-binding resolution. Feingold is also doing all that he can to build support for his legislative effort, taking to the blogs and the airways like a Senator possessed. By putting himself out there in such a way, Feingold is signaling a willingness to be accountable for his legislations results. Given that those results would probably include the deaths of hundreds of thousands of innocents as Iraq instantly devolved into a state of affairs right out of Conrad, Feingolds willingness to accept accountability is no small thing.
Its too bad he lacks a worthy foil on the other side of the aisle. Wouldnt it be nice if a Republican, any Republican, offered a piece of legislation that said in essence that we resolve to bear any burden necessary to prevail in Iraq? At this point, Id even settle for a non-binding resolution to that effect.
THERES AN OLD SAW that all 100 Senators want to be President. The current Senate is disabusing us of that long-held notion. Most of todays Senators dont want to be president. They dont want to lead. They just want to look like theyre president. Thats what all these non-binding resolutions have really been about. Chuck Hagel boldly preened before the cameras of C-SPAN about the urgent need for all Senators to commit themselves to a non-binding resolution. For this shoddy piece of political showmanship, former Reagan speech-writer Peggy Noonan saluted Hagels "courage" on the Wall Street Journals website. We have surely passed through some sort of looking glass when lecturing ones colleagues about a non-binding piece of legislative amusement gets perceived as courage.
All the resolutions in some regards are the same, be they of the relatively benign variety like the McCain resolution or the truly pernicious Warner resolution. All of them are merely vehicles that will enable their supporting Senators to look like leaders. Or at last thats what they hope.
The solons putting forth the resolutions knowing that the resolutions wont do a blessed thing besides give their supporting Senators a talking point when they seek reelection. Their fondest wish is that by championing the resolutions, they can look like the guy in the drivers seat on a ladder truck. When you look quickly at a ladder truck, it looks like the guy in the drivers seat is in control, but its actually the guy in the rear who is doing the real steering. Thats the nature of the con so many Senators are trying to pull.
NATURALLY, IT WOULD BE HILARY CLINTON who would elevate this generally bi-partisan Senatorial malfeasance to new and unprecedented levels. On the campaign trail this week, the former first lady demanded that the President settle the Iraq situation before he leaves office rather than leave it to his successor. She said it would be "the height of irresponsibility" to do otherwise. Of course, Senator Clinton hopes to be President Bushs successor so her bizarre sentiment expresses some selfish concerns.
Its easy to find historic parallels where presidents werent able to leave a perfect world to their successors. Truman left the Korean War to Eisenhower; Ike never complained. LBJ left Vietnam to Nixon; Nixon also didnt complain. Even Senator Clintons husband, after purportedly being obsessed with the pursuit of Osama bin Laden for several years, was unable to deliver his successor a world devoid of its greatest terrorist threat. Given the way the hunt for bin Laden allegedly consumed President Clinton, we can assume he knew the stakes. One wonders whether his wife would label his bequeathing the problem to his successor "the height of irresponsibility."
But history be damned. I say Senator Clinton should double down on her demands of the Bush administration. As one of his possible successors, she should demand that he also bring peace to the troubled Israeli/Palestinian conflict. And then he should settle things with North Korea (like her husband did). In his spare time, he should figure out the mysteries of cold fusion so his successor wont be plagued by energy costs or concerns.
But let us not be too hard on the former First Lady. Shes a Senator now, and just doing what 21st century Senators do. Senator Clinton doesnt want to truly lead anymore than she wants to have an in-law suite for Monica Lewinsky in Chappaqua.
Most modern day Senators for sure want office. But they dont want to lead.
Dean Barnett blogs almost daily at HughHewitt.com. He has also been a frequent contributor to the Weekly Standard's online edition, The Daily Standard. He can be reached for comment at soxblog@aol.com.
This is what our Senators want to cut and run from, cowards who blow up innocents in the marketplace.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1778599/posts?page=1
Imam leads Democrats in prayer of conversion. Read the whole thing. Although it's WND, Robert Spencer has serious credentials.
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1778488/posts
We have soldiers being killed by jihadists in Iraq, and the Democrats are being led in "prayer" by an Imam.
.
I would say most politicians don't want to lead, they only want the perks of office.
It says a great deal about our "friends" in the democrat party.
Robert Spencer has serious credentials.
"He's a one trick pony,
one trick is all that horse can do.
He's a one trick pony,
It's the principal source of his revenue.."
Paul Simon
It tells you something about Feingold that when they selected Senate committee chairs, even though he had more seniority than other Senators, he was denied.
The U. N. aint got nothing on our Senate when it comes to preening and showboating to accomplish not a damn thing.
What senators want has never been in doubt - they, like everyone else in government - local, state, and national - want taxpayer-funded ego trips, salaries, perks, health benefits, paid vacations, "fact-finding" junkets, pensions, postal franking of re-election materials, parking spots, and all the various privileges and special treatement our government Masters have accrued to themselves over the past century of constitutional erosion and abuse.
Excellent article.
The Word TRAITOR branded into their foreheads? A prolonged session in a room with some baseball bat welding military veterans? An enema so they can get a brain transplant?
Oh what they WANT, I guess that would be what they NEED.
bttt
I am sick of reading about senators, hearing senators on the radio, and seeing senators on TV. I just want them to shut up and go back their ornate chamber.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.