To: Dog Gone
That's probably because boys can't get cervical cancer.
But they carry the virus. And if they're sexual profligates, will give it out liberally to every girl they shag. Trust me, it's only a matter of time before Nanny Perry mandates this for boys as well.
43 posted on
02/02/2007 1:48:25 PM PST by
Antoninus
( Who is Duncan Hunter? Find out....www.gohunter08.com)
To: Antoninus
Not until Merck completes the male testing and gets FDA approval, and that's well more than 5-7 years away.
45 posted on
02/02/2007 1:50:35 PM PST by
Spktyr
(Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
To: Antoninus
I don't know all the ways HPV can be transmitted, but vaccines are far more cost-effective than treating the disease it prevents.
It apparently results in a worse, and potentially fatal, outcome for females. What woman wouldn't want the vaccine? Even a virgin until marriage ought to have the protection, if it's only contagious by sex, unless she knows her husband doesn't have the virus.
53 posted on
02/02/2007 1:53:14 PM PST by
Dog Gone
To: Antoninus
The main thing wrong here that I see is that they should have made a vaccine for the boys first.
If readers read the whole thing - there is a opt-out. I will be studying it.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson