[Luke21]

Rudy already had a shot at Hillary. And he suddenly developed cancer in mid-race, leaving Hillary against Lazio. I found that sudden cancer thing very odd.

Let's just say the cancer was real and bad and whatever. What in the world is he doing running for president? Paul Tsongas had cancer, ran for president and is now deceased. If Rudy can't finish a senate race, why would he not be a health risk as president.

I'm biased against him, I know, primarily because I think he's the worst kind of Rino, and that he has absolutely zero chance of being elected. I'm always amazed at how the Rudyites cheerlead for a guy whose most enduring political act was handing a senate seat to Hillary Clinton.

[Fairview]

Don't be unfair. Rudy had prostate cancer. That is not something you can fake; there are too many records involved.

[TomGuy]

Rudy already had a shot at Hillary. And he suddenly developed cancer in mid-race, leaving Hillary against Lazio. I found that sudden cancer thing very odd.

I have previously posted the same thing. That smelled. Kerry was treated for postrate cancer just months before he ran for the presidency in 04. It didn't seem to slow him. And Rudy's 'treatment schedule' doesn't jive. Rudy left the campaign in the spring, but didn't undergo treatment until the late summer/fall.

I suspicion that Rudy bowed out for other reasons -- and Hillary knew them.

==

That is one consideration that must be made about any GOP nominee: The GOP better know his/her skeletons, because Hillary certainly will know them.

[FreeInWV]

"Rudy already had a shot at Hillary..."

You're preaching to the choir. I said he should run against Hillary in the DEMOCRAT primary. That is where a liberal like him belongs. Not in a GOP race.

[nopardons]

Rudy's father dies, at a rather young age, from prostate cancer, the same kind of cancer that Rudy had. There was nothing in the least "suspicious" or false about his bout with prostate cancer.

When caught early, prostate cancer is one of THE most "curable" cancers there is. When ignored/left untreated, it depends upon the age of the man, the family history, and whether or not the cancer cells have escaped the wall of the prostate, how deadly it is.

Without a family history of prostate cancer, in one's 50s, 5 out of every 10 men will get prostate cancer, in one's 60s, 6 out of 10, in one's 70s, 7 out of every 10 men, in one's 80s, 8 out of every 10 men will get it and so on.