Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Red Badger
You have to take the church aspect out of it. The church submitted to (dubious NFL)authorities, but that does not make them right.

This is more of a private property/public airwaves issue. Private property belongs to the people...public airwaves belong to the people.

If this were not the NFL and was instead the DNC...the issue would be much clearer. Could the DNC restrict the use of your tv in your home to view their convention? Could they ban gatherings on private property within a mile of the convention site? Could they prevent you from having any other content other than their convention when you view it (such as opposition views or disparagement)? Can they restrict the tv you view it on? Can they restrict how many people you can have in your own home viewing it? All this just because they "own the images"?

Scary stuff when talking about general principles rather than just a game.
56 posted on 02/01/2007 8:11:24 AM PST by Arkinsaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]


To: Arkinsaw
If this were a movie, One Night With The King for instance, being shown free of charge, would not they still be in violation of the law? When I bought "NFL Ticket" for $250, to see all games all season long, if I so chose, it comes with notice that I can use it only for my private use, not public, and cannot "re-broadcast, tape or otherwise" show it in a group setting........
68 posted on 02/01/2007 8:21:32 AM PST by Red Badger (Rachel Carson is responsible for more deaths than Adolf Hitler...............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson