Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Boston Bomb Scare: Outraged Menino vows no mercy for stunt - Sham suspect jailed
Boston Herald ^ | February 1, 2007 | Laura Crimaldi & Michelle McPhee

Posted on 02/01/2007 3:16:22 AM PST by billorites

A furious Boston Mayor Thomas M. Menino vowed yesterday to throw the book at the masterminds behind a guerrilla marketing campaign gone amok that plunged the city into bomb-scare pandemonium and blew nearly $1 million in police overtime and other costs.

As city and state attorneys laid groundwork for criminal charges and lawsuits, cops seized 27-year-old Arlington multimedia artist Peter Berdovsky, who posted film on his Web site boasting that he and friends planted the battery-wired devices, and Sean Stevens, 28, of Charlestown. Both were jailed overnight on charges of placing a hoax device and disorderly conduct.

“This is outrageous activity to get publicity for a failing show,” said Menino, referring to the battery-operated light-up ads for the Cartoon Network’s “Aqua Teen Hunger Force,” which sparked at least nine bomb scares in Boston, Cambridge and Somerville.

Menino promised to sue Turner Broadcasting Co., the Cartoon Network’s parent company, and criminally prosecute Berdovsky and anyone else responsible for the devices, and to petition the FCC to pull the network’s license.

Attorney General Martha Coakley was put in charge of the case and said the companies behind the promotion would be investigated. She said the felony charge of planting a hoax device could be broad enough to allow prosecution even if the stunt’s sponsors did not intend a panic.

“To do this kind of placement of devices the way it was, an individual had to know or should have that it was going to create the kind of panic it did,” Coakley said last night during a press conference.

Panic was the order of the day in Boston as city, state and federal investigators, police and bomb units raced through the city seeking 38 of the devices, in some cases destroying them as a precaution.

Shutdowns affected Storrow and Memorial drives, the Longfellow and Boston University bridges and Interstate 93, while extra Coast Guard patrols were seen at Rowes Wharf and at commuter ferries.

“I cannot state strongly enough the seriousness of this offense,” said Suffolk County District Attorney Daniel Conley. “Commerce was disrupted, transportation routes were paralyzed, residents were stranded, relatives across the nation were in fear for their loved ones here in the city of Boston.”

In a statement, Turner Broadcasting said the light-emitting devices pose no danger and are part of a 10-city outdoor marketing campaign for the cartoon program. A Boston police spokesman said the company did not have permits to place the signs in the city.

“We regret that they were mistakenly thought to pose any danger,” the Turner statment said.

All told, the cost of extra police and activating the city’s anti-terror command center will cost Boston $800,000 to $1 million in damages, an angry Menino estimated.

Gov. Deval Patrick said he was not impressed by the apology from Turner Broadcasting.“I am deeply dismayed to learn that the devices are a part of a marketing campaign. This stunt has caused considerable disruption and anxiety in our community,” he said.

The bomb scare reports began about 8 a.m. when a MBTA worker reported a package with wires and tubes protruding from it that was stuck on a steel girder under Interstate 93 at Sullivan Square Station in Charlestown. The devices, featuring characters with raised middle fingers, had magnetic backs and were affixed to metal.

The reports spread throughout the day to the Boston University and Longfellow bridges, Downtown Crossing, the intersection of Stuart Street and Columbus Avenue, the intersection of Massachusetts Avenue and Memorial Drive in Cambridge, the McCarthy Overpass on the McGrath O’Brien Highway in Somerville and at a comic book store in Brighton.

The discovery of two more devices last night at the Massachusetts College of Art prompted another brief evacuation. By the end of the day, investigators had recovered 14 of the 38 devices believed to be placed in the Boston area and urged the public to report the whereabouts of others.

Just after three p.m., two bomb-sniffing dogs swept through City Hall, spending 16 minutes in Menino’s office. “It is outrageous, in a post 9/11 world, that a company would use this irresponsible marketing scheme,” Menino said.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: advertising; boston; littering; postnobillls
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 421-426 next last
To: zeke15
Dismayed? I'd think you would be ELATED to learn the devices were harmless. What were you hoping for Gov. Patrick?

I'm no fan of Deval Patrick, but I'm pretty confident that he was happy that the devices were harmless, but dismayed that people would be so irresponsible.

I would fault him for being dismayed instead of outraged.

At some point irresponsiblity becomes actionable. This is beyond that point.

201 posted on 02/01/2007 6:47:31 AM PST by bondjamesbond (Have you ever noticed that whatever the problem, the government's solution is always "more taxes"?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 196 | View Replies]

To: ItsTheMediaStupid
A bridge is a perfect place for an ad.

Yeah, too bad it's illegal here without a permit -- and they don't to my knowledge issue permits for advertising on bridges. At least I've never seen any advertising on one.

Maybe if you go into outdoor advertising, you'd better get a lawyer first.

202 posted on 02/01/2007 6:47:47 AM PST by maryz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies]

To: OrioleFan
Finally the "Rules don't apply to us" crowd will get their just reward.

Which crowd is that? The marketers or the State?

203 posted on 02/01/2007 6:48:31 AM PST by Wormwood (Your Friendly Neighborhood Moderate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies]

To: grjr21

I like how someone thought they had to "fuzz out" the character's hand. Given he doesn't have 5 fingers, for all you know he's saying "I'm number one!!"


204 posted on 02/01/2007 6:49:02 AM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT
However, they had to get all the devices, because it would be a clever thing to put up 38 devices, including a few in harder-to-find places with real explosives, hoping that once the police found a few and realised they were harmless they would let down their guard, and you could remote-detonate the real ones when you had enough police officers gawking over them.

Yep...like I said, better safe than sorry. It's a sick world we live in and unfortunately too many people simply do not want to see it.

205 posted on 02/01/2007 6:50:42 AM PST by blinachka (Vechnaya Pamyat Daddy... xoxo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies]

To: maryz
Yeah, too bad it's illegal here without a permit -- and they don't to my knowledge issue permits for advertising on bridges. At least I've never seen any advertising on one. Maybe if you go into outdoor advertising, you'd better get a lawyer first.

It's legal in most places, as long as they are not spray painted or bumper stickers. Other places it is not. Fairly common in many places.

206 posted on 02/01/2007 6:52:57 AM PST by ItsTheMediaStupid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies]

To: maryz

Which room is a better place to hide stuff?

A lot of visual clutter makes it easy to hide stuff.

207 posted on 02/01/2007 6:54:38 AM PST by bondjamesbond (Have you ever noticed that whatever the problem, the government's solution is always "more taxes"?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies]

To: ItsTheMediaStupid

In other words, you should check with a local lawyer before you start.


208 posted on 02/01/2007 6:54:39 AM PST by maryz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 206 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT
I like how someone thought they had to "fuzz out" the character's hand.

Given what did happen in Boston they were probably right in doing so , after all some one might confuse it with a real person giving them the real middle finger
209 posted on 02/01/2007 6:56:14 AM PST by grjr21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]

To: Wormwood

Turner


210 posted on 02/01/2007 6:56:54 AM PST by OrioleFan (Republicans believe every day is July 4th, but DemocRATs believe every day is April 15th. - Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies]

To: Eroteme

Amen brother.


211 posted on 02/01/2007 6:57:23 AM PST by sgtbono2002 (I will forgive Jane Fonda, when the Jews forgive Hitler.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies]

To: blinachka
However, they had to get all the devices, because it would be a clever thing to put up 38 devices, including a few in harder-to-find places with real explosives, hoping that once the police found a few and realised they were harmless they would let down their guard, and you could remote-detonate the real ones when you had enough police officers gawking over them.

Yep...like I said, better safe than sorry. It's a sick world we live in and unfortunately too many people simply do not want to see it.

This is obviously a reply from dumb to dumber. To have a bomb you need to have room for the explosives, these had maybe enough space for a firecracker. I can assure you that if the assembler had spilt white powder in this then those goose stepers would have spent ten million looking for every last one, not as confident about a fire cracker but maybe then too. If you want an effective way to hide a real bomb, try parking a yellow truck in a parking garage.

212 posted on 02/01/2007 7:00:31 AM PST by ItsTheMediaStupid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 205 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT

It's easier and less likely to be detected if you simply drop the bomb in trash can on the street.

Your lap top is a threat to an enclosed airplane - not the outside of a bridge or a building.


213 posted on 02/01/2007 7:00:34 AM PST by DB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT
Sadly, it worked for them, everybody knows about the Aqua Teen Hunger Force now.

Now if I could only figure out a way for everybody to bring me candy...

214 posted on 02/01/2007 7:00:41 AM PST by jmc813 (Please check out www.marrow.org and consider becoming a donor. You may save a life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: maryz
In other words, you should check with a local lawyer before you start.

I suspect they did.

215 posted on 02/01/2007 7:01:53 AM PST by ItsTheMediaStupid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 208 | View Replies]

To: ItsTheMediaStupid

In that case, they have grounds for a legal malpractice suit.


216 posted on 02/01/2007 7:04:30 AM PST by maryz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 215 | View Replies]

To: ItsTheMediaStupid

In that case, they have grounds for a legal malpractice suit.


217 posted on 02/01/2007 7:04:30 AM PST by maryz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 215 | View Replies]

To: bondjamesbond

I didn't say it wasn't a "good" place. I said it was illegal. You know, just as occasionally some nut notices that it would be much faster to drive on the sidewalk, the street being so cluttered with cars.


218 posted on 02/01/2007 7:08:14 AM PST by maryz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 207 | View Replies]

To: maryz

And if idiots clutter up your bridge supports and public infrastructure with a lot of stick on electronic krep, it makes it a lot easier to hide a bomb.


219 posted on 02/01/2007 7:12:45 AM PST by bondjamesbond (Have you ever noticed that whatever the problem, the government's solution is always "more taxes"?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 218 | View Replies]

To: ItsTheMediaStupid
I am shocked that San Francisco didn't think they were mean't as an insult to guy's. Maybe they thought it was Sponge Bob flipping it to the straight guys.

LOL. Not surprised it wasn’t noticed in SF. They probably saw it, though it was “art”, and didn’t remove it for fear of being sued.

220 posted on 02/01/2007 7:24:00 AM PST by Lurking in Kansas (Nothing witty here... move on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 421-426 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson