Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CharlesWayneCT
However, they had to get all the devices, because it would be a clever thing to put up 38 devices, including a few in harder-to-find places with real explosives, hoping that once the police found a few and realised they were harmless they would let down their guard, and you could remote-detonate the real ones when you had enough police officers gawking over them.

Yep...like I said, better safe than sorry. It's a sick world we live in and unfortunately too many people simply do not want to see it.

205 posted on 02/01/2007 6:50:42 AM PST by blinachka (Vechnaya Pamyat Daddy... xoxo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies ]


To: blinachka
However, they had to get all the devices, because it would be a clever thing to put up 38 devices, including a few in harder-to-find places with real explosives, hoping that once the police found a few and realised they were harmless they would let down their guard, and you could remote-detonate the real ones when you had enough police officers gawking over them.

Yep...like I said, better safe than sorry. It's a sick world we live in and unfortunately too many people simply do not want to see it.

This is obviously a reply from dumb to dumber. To have a bomb you need to have room for the explosives, these had maybe enough space for a firecracker. I can assure you that if the assembler had spilt white powder in this then those goose stepers would have spent ten million looking for every last one, not as confident about a fire cracker but maybe then too. If you want an effective way to hide a real bomb, try parking a yellow truck in a parking garage.

212 posted on 02/01/2007 7:00:31 AM PST by ItsTheMediaStupid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 205 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson