1 posted on
01/30/2007 1:23:03 PM PST by
SmithL
To: SmithL
I'm fine with sticking this guy in Guantanamo, giving him a military tribunal, followed by a quick execution. But that's just me.
2 posted on
01/30/2007 1:36:40 PM PST by
SmithL
(si vis pacem, para bellum)
To: SmithL
Padilla claims he was tortured in custody, and his lawyers say he is suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder that raises questions about his competence for trial. Cry me a river
To: SmithL
Padilla ain't even Padilla.
He's Abdullah Al Muhajir.
Keep that in mind, and you really don't need to keep much else in mind.
5 posted on
01/30/2007 2:05:58 PM PST by
xzins
(Retired Army Chaplain and proud of it! Supporting our troops means praying for them to WIN!)
To: SmithL; Admin Moderator
"ACTIVISTJUDGE" made it up in the Keywords, put there by ____? ... so, it's an "activist" judge who would REINSTATE a terrorism charge against an Al Qaeda member? Weird!
7 posted on
01/30/2007 2:18:37 PM PST by
cgk
(I don't see myself as a conservative. I see myself as a religious, right-wing, wacko extremist.)
To: SmithL
"the three charges in the indictment contained nearly identical elements and could subject the defendants to extra punishment for the same act"
I'm confused. The judges reject charges that might cause additional punishment for the same crime, but enhancing punishment for a crime because it is also a "Hate Crime" is ok? \sarc
10 posted on
01/30/2007 3:58:58 PM PST by
fowb
To: SmithL; All
14 posted on
02/28/2007 2:34:45 PM PST by
mdittmar
(May God watch over those who serve,and have served, to keep us free.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson