Posted on 01/30/2007 1:08:55 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach
Windows Vista is "dramatically more secure than any other operating system released", Microsoft founder Bill Gates has told BBC News. Mr Gates said the security features in the new operating system were reason enough to upgrade from Windows XP. Microsoft launched Vista in London, with more than 100m computers predicted to be using it within 12 months. Mr Gates also defended the pricing of Vista, which is twice as expensive in Europe compared to the US.
The technology leader called the launch a "big day" that would bring a new digital workstyle and lifestyle.
The new operating system (OS) boasts an improved interface and security tools. Mr Gates said security in Vista would mean it would be "much, much harder" for malicious hackers to attack computers running the operating system. "For anybody worried about safety, whether it is phishing or malware or parental control type issues, Vista brings that to a whole new level of capability," he added. Security analysts have praised the improved tools in Vista but many feel that holes in the operating system eventually will be exposed and that Microsoft will continue to need to update it through online patches.
Microsoft will come under fire if Vista proves to be the popular target of malicious hackers exploiting flaws, said David Mitchell, the software practice leader at analysts Ovum. "It's crucial for corporate reputation and revenue that Vista proves more secure and stable than XP," he said. Not all PCs will be able to run Vista - Microsoft recommends machines have at least 512Mb of RAM, a 800Mhz processor and 15Gb of hard disk space.
Microsoft has pledged to continue support for XP users until 2011. The company launched Vista for business users two months ago. Now Vista has been released to consumers, who can buy four home versions. There is also a stripped down version of the OS, Vista Starter, which is aimed at customers in developing countries. It will be available in 70 languages and will run on slower and older PCs.
But Microsoft could face a backlash from consumers over its pricing plans - with the cost of Vista versions in the US roughly half the price of equivalent versions in the UK. Prices for the OS in the UK range from about £100 for an upgrade version of the Basic package to £249 for a copy of the upgrade to the Ultimate version of Vista. In the US prices start from $100 (£52) for an upgrade of Vista Home basic to $249 (£127) for the equivalent Ultimate version. Mr Gates defended Microsoft's pricing plans: "We try to keep our prices largely in line from country to country... but with price you do generally get some things that get a bit out of alignment as currencies go up and down. "Our goal across our product line is to largely have a global way of looking at things." Mr Mitchell said there was pent up consumer demand for Vista.
"In the consumer space there has not been any new release of a Windows operating system for five years," he said.
Ovum predicts that 15% of XP machines will be running Vista by the end of 2007. "Part of the appetite is 'something new for something new's sake'," said Mr Mitchell. Mr Mitchell predicted that the new graphical interface, called Aero, improved desktop search tools and a promise of more robust security would appeal to many users. But he predicted some consumers could be confused by the minimum specifications for PCs to run Vista and by the different versions on sale. Users can visit the Microsoft website to check if their hardware will run Vista and some new machines are being labelled Vista Capable or Premier Vista Ready, for those PCs with higher specifications. "There's been an attempt to demystify what the minimum specifications are," said Mr Mitchell. "Undoubtedly some people - as in any industry - won't read the instructions." In his interview with the BBC Mr Gates also predicted that school children would be using tablet PCs rather than text books in 10 years time. "We will have an inexpensive tablet-like device that lets the teachers customise things.
We enjoy having them in the business
"Hopefully the cost of that isn't much more than textbooks have been so that's a big change." He also welcomed the arrival of Apple's iPhone into the market calling it "a great new entrant" "What we are seeing for all these products is that software is increasingly important. If you look at a phone of five years ago it was really about the hardware only.
"But now as you are browsing and managing your calendar and having lots of music or photos, the software is the thing that counts and there are very few companies to do great software." Microsoft produces software which runs on millions of mobile phones and portable devices. He added: "We enjoy having them [Apple] in the business."
|
That's my gripe with it. I don't like someone dictating what I can do with my PC. I also dislike it being a resource hog. I don't mind building a powerful box if I'm going to be doing resource intensive work, but having to have such hardware just to run the OS is just crazy.
Who protects us from people willing to make things up to smear Microsoft?
I don't care about the additional eye-candy in the operating system. So-called security protections are also messing up my applications in industrial controls. A colleague who does HMI work for me had to uninstall the automatically installed Internet Explorer 7, since it conflicts with applications that he works with (not home games/graphics/fun stuff - WORK!). One of my platforms I am still running Windows2000 because XP interferes with certain communications protocols. And now this Vista with the so-called security - what is it going to delete? If it was not for the industrial automation (as in programmable logic controllers) software that I use, I am approaching the point of telling Microsoft to go to hell, and go to Macintosh, since OS-X is essentially UNIX. Stable, bulletproof, and still preferred for math intensive real time process modelling. UNIX (X-windows) is still used in oilfield seismic logging.
If anyone here works for Rockwell Automation, and there is anything being considered on versions of RSLogix/Networks/Panelbuilder Plus software running in OS-X, freepmail me. I'm a business partner in a systems integration company.
Nah, WinME can run very nicely if tweaked right. 3 of our 4 boxes run it and BSODs are something we see a combined total of maybe 2, 3 times a year.
Only times WinME's ever given me real issues, it was always due to a hardware problem that later revealed itself...be it a failing hard drive, or a dying cpu fan causing minor overheating that got progressively worse, or iffy ram. Always worked right after the hardware issue was addressed, too.
"Robust" I always thought meant crash proof.
Linux is about as crash proof as you can get in an OS
I don't do presentations, just high end CAD (BRL-CAD, Vari-Cad) and 3-D rendering.
Exactly. For work, you need Linux. For play, it's OSX.
Robust as in Substance. Crash proof different... It is like the difference between an Accura and a BMW. The Accura will run for ever but the BMW feels thick.
Who let loose the Hordes of Mac junkies?
This isn't a thread about Mac.
Some of you Mac's need to move out of Mothers basement already.
/Sheesh
Sorry, wrong thread.
Smiling...yes, I did read it and forgot to go back.
Heh.
I've given presentations using both KPresenter and OpenOffice.org's Presenter. Unless you desperately need to make your presentation into a cartoon they both are at least as good as PowerPoint.
But if turning your presentation into a cartoon is what you really want, the GIMP works wonderfully. And both KPresenter and OO.o Presenter both support importing EPS files from the GIMP.
Now if you are serious about building a quality presentation...
MagicPoint rocks.
People who don't know anything about Linux software should refrain from commenting on it.
Who needs to make things up? Microsoft has done more than enough stupid and unethical things to warrant the abuse that gets heaped on them.
The current homepage of magicpoint (also includes some sample presentations here and here)
My link was from my bookmark for MagicPoint tricks which unfortunately has a bad link for the MagicPoint main site.
Another option is to simply use LaTeX and use the beamer class to output to pdf or dvi.
ping
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.