Skip to comments.
This proposed smoking ban has some fuming
LA Times ^
| 1/30/07
| Maria L. La Ganga
Posted on 01/30/2007 6:39:54 AM PST by Technoman
BELMONT, CALIF. When the City Council of this San Francisco suburb voted to consider what could be the most stringent tobacco regulation in America, anti-smoking activists cheered. Banning smoking everywhere but single-family detached homes and their yards would be a big step forward, even in health-conscious California.
(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...
TOPICS: Government; US: California
KEYWORDS: allyourliberty; arebelong2govt; ban; police; smoking
If police begin breaking down doors to enforce this and the proposed draconian spanking law, those in law enforcement will seen with bitter contempt by those in the mainstream -- smokers, moms and dads trying to raise kids -- as law zealots brings more into their net.
1
posted on
01/30/2007 6:39:55 AM PST
by
Technoman
To: Technoman
the most stringent tobacco regulation in America, anti-smoking activists wackos cheered. Fixed it.
2
posted on
01/30/2007 6:45:33 AM PST
by
Michael.SF.
(It's time our lawmakers paid more attention to their responsibilities, and less to their privileges.)
To: Technoman
Marijuana and cocaine were once legal, too; and now even some alleged 'conservatives' cheer when jack-booted thugs break down the doors of otherwise law abiding citizens to arrest and/or shoot those in possession of those substances.
3
posted on
01/30/2007 7:02:15 AM PST
by
RedStateRocker
(Nuke Mecca, Deport all illegals, abolish the IRS, ATF and DEA)
To: RedStateRocker
Hope you've got your asbestos handy! LOL.
4
posted on
01/30/2007 7:16:55 AM PST
by
saganite
(Billions and billions and billions-------and that's just the NASA budget!)
To: RedStateRocker
some alleged 'conservatives' cheer when jack-booted thugs break down the doors of otherwise law abiding citizens to arrest and/or shoot those in possession of [Marijuana and cocaine]. Really? Do you have an example or two in mind?
ML/NJ
5
posted on
01/30/2007 7:19:16 AM PST
by
ml/nj
To: Technoman
To: Technoman
"We have a right to breathe clean air. I think it's a great ordinance
I'm sure I'm in the minority."
I guess California intends to ban all cars, trucks, motorcycles, aircraft and manufacturing next?
Isn't it odd that so many people have all these "rights," but others don't?
7
posted on
01/30/2007 7:27:26 AM PST
by
DakotaRed
To: Technoman
How does a smoking ban reconcile with legal marijuana smoking?
To: Technoman
Let me be the one to say it: It's fine to be in the country illegally, but if you live in an apartment and smoke a cigarette you'll be in trouble with the law. If you give your child a smack on the behind to keep him away from the hot stove, ditto, you can go to jail.
I'm glad I don't live in this crazy state.
9
posted on
01/30/2007 7:50:42 AM PST
by
joylyn
To: ml/nj
10
posted on
01/30/2007 7:57:58 AM PST
by
RedStateRocker
(Nuke Mecca, Deport all illegals, abolish the IRS, ATF and DEA)
To: Technoman
"I'm a nonsmoker, and I'm all for it; I have asthma," said Alice Larson, 51, who was meeting a friend at a Mexican restaurant. "We have a right to breathe clean air."
Oh, how I'd love for Ms. Larson to SHOW ME where that right is. Is it right next to where liberals think every child has the RIGHT to a college education?
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson