Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. missile defense maturing, latest test a success(thanks to NK, operational in a year)
Reuters ^ | 01/30/07 | Andrea Shalal-Esa

Posted on 01/29/2007 7:05:53 PM PST by TigerLikesRooster

U.S. missile defense maturing, latest test a success

By Andrea Shalal-Esa

1 hour, 46 minutes ago

Within a year, the U.S. missile defense system should be able to guard against enemy attacks, while testing new technologies, the deputy director of the U.S. Missile Defense Agency said on Monday.

The United States activated the ground-based system last summer when North Korea launched one long-range and six short-range missiles.

North Korea's intercontinental Taepodong 2 missile fell into the Sea of Japan shortly after launch but the short-range tests appeared successful, said Brig. Gen. Patrick O'Reilly, deputy director of the Pentagon's Missile Defense Agency.

O'Reilly said there would be no formal announcement that the system was operational. He predicted the capability to defend against enemy missiles and to continue testing and development work would be achieved within a year.

"It's just a matter of maturation," he told reporters after a speech hosted by the George C. Marshall Institute, a public policy group.

O'Reilly said work by North Korea and Iran on long-range ballistic missiles underscored the need for a viable U.S. missile defense system.

The war between Israel and Lebanon's Hezbollah militants last summer also highlighted the dangers of ballistic missiles and their use by non-state actors, he said. "We know we must be prepared for all contingencies."

O'Reilly said the missile defense system, which includes sea-based and ground-based interceptors, and powerful X-Band radar systems, achieved success in 14 of 15 flight tests.

Through the end of 2007, the program will focus on protecting the United States from threats from the Middle East and North Korea, expanding coverage to U.S. allies and boosting protection against shorter-range threats.

In 2008 and beyond, there would be increased focus on countering unconventional attacks and increasing the U.S. inventory of interceptors and sensors, O'Reilly said.

RUSSIA IS WARY

On Saturday, the Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD), built by Lockheed Martin Corp, intercepted a target shot from a barge. It was the first test of THAAD since its move to the Pacific Missile Range Facility in Hawaii.

Two more THAAD intercept tests are planned for 2007, along with three tests of the Aegis Standard Missile-3 interceptors against short- and medium-range targets, O'Reilly said.

The agency also plans two tests of long-range ground-based interceptors in late spring and early fall.

The United States has 14 interceptors in Alaska and two in California, primarily to counter North Korea. O'Reilly said the number in Alaska would grow to 21 within eight months.

By 2011, plans call for some 40 interceptors in Alaska and four at Vandenberg Air Force Base in California, he said.

He said negotiations were just beginning with Poland to host up to 10 ground-based interceptors and with the Czech Republic about fielding an advanced radar station.

Asked about the concerns of Russian officials, O'Reilly said the United States was talking with Moscow and hoped to convince it that placing U.S. missile defenses in eastern Europe could also enhance Russia's security as well.

He gave no timeline for completing negotiations with Poland and the Czechs, but said the United States was "always looking at all our options" if either country chose not to proceed.

"We'll have to see how it unfolds," O'Reilly said.


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: korea; missiledefense; progress
Missile defense foes were undercut by remaining Axis of Evil. Maybe MD foes should ask them to give up nukes, though that is unlikely.
1 posted on 01/29/2007 7:05:55 PM PST by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster; AmericanInTokyo; OahuBreeze; yonif; risk; Steel Wolf; nuconvert; MizSterious; ...

Ping!


2 posted on 01/29/2007 7:06:30 PM PST by TigerLikesRooster (kim jong-il, kae jong-il, chia head, pogri, midget sh*tbag)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster; Jet Jaguar; monkapotamus; txradioguy; All

COOL rack itt Tiger


3 posted on 01/29/2007 7:08:39 PM PST by SevenofNine ("We are Freepers, all your media belong to us, resistence is futile")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
Why doesn't hollywierd rejoice over NMD? It's an entirely peaceful weapon. They should love it!
4 posted on 01/29/2007 7:09:50 PM PST by sam_paine (X .................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
[The United States activated the ground-based system last summer when North Korea launched one long-range and six short-range missiles. ]

I'm thinking that the curious failure of their long-range missile represented a successful "test" for us.

5 posted on 01/29/2007 7:11:15 PM PST by Mad_Tom_Rackham (Well, it's 2007. Time to get ready for 2008.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

And thanks to Ronaldus Maximus, the far sighted leader.


6 posted on 01/29/2007 7:28:55 PM PST by sgtyork (Prove to us that you can enforce the borders first)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Only a couple of years ago Missile Defense was attacked by our "loyal opposition" as de-stabilizing and a waste of money.

They haven't had much to say about it lately. As has often been the case, Bush was right (as was Reagan), and they were loudly, sneeringly, wrong.

Its a never-ending source of amusement to me, that the DNC can be consistently wrong on every issue and still find a loyal voting block - the dim, the deviant, the disfunctional, and the nimrods who lead them.


7 posted on 01/29/2007 7:29:38 PM PST by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marron
Re #7

Too many unrepentant hippies and people they managed to brainwash.

Natalie Portman is the example of the latter. I watched the Star Wars Rerun last night.:-)

8 posted on 01/29/2007 7:33:15 PM PST by TigerLikesRooster (kim jong-il, kae jong-il, chia head, pogri, midget sh*tbag)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

I hope the once it is activated, there is always somebody awake at the controls. It is one of those things that you can't afterwards go, "Oh, we should have been more alert" like has happened to us a couple of times in the past after a dreadful attack.


9 posted on 01/29/2007 7:40:25 PM PST by KellyAdmirer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster; SevenofNine; nuconvert; Grampa Dave; potlatch; ntnychik; devolve; ...
Missile Defense Agency

Great news for America; bad news for Kim Jong Il and China, hence the Chinese antisatellite saber-rattling.

And predictably the Russians deem it more capitalist imperialism, a sentiment echoed by their fifth column in the Leahy-Kennedy wing of the rat party.

A toast to Ronaldus Magnus and the idea which shook the world, and gives our enemies the shakes today.

10 posted on 01/29/2007 8:28:25 PM PST by PhilDragoo (Hitlery: das Butch von Buchenvald)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mad_Tom_Rackham

Safe to say.


11 posted on 01/29/2007 8:49:43 PM PST by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

It's about damn time!


12 posted on 01/29/2007 11:15:40 PM PST by Luke Skyfreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sam_paine
You clearly don't understand their objective....

See this:

Unholy Alliance: Radical Islam and the American Left

13 posted on 01/30/2007 8:19:33 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach (The DemonicRATS believe ....that the best decisions are always made after the fact.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Do I have to put sarcasm tags on everything?


14 posted on 01/31/2007 6:11:13 AM PST by sam_paine (X .................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson