Is the New World Order a Good Idea?

There are people in the world who believe that all inhabitants of the earth should be governed by one government. They want to establish this government which is called the New World Order. This government will replace the sovereignty of nations; because borders will cease to exist. The establishment of the European Union is an example of moving the world toward this idea of a New World Order.

The first is what is referred to as multiculturalism. This idea is multilateralist in nature; in that it requires a multi-nation approach under the United Nations and the New Word Court (already established under the European Union). The idea is that when you bring all things to all people, and they have everything in common, then they will be happy. The government gives gifts to the populace and the people are grateful to the government. Not surprisingly, this is the choice of implementation chosen by members of the Democrat party in the U.S..

The second idea for implementation of the New World Order is called Globalism. The movement is unilateralist in nature. The idea is that the United States of America has the right to spread democracy around the world; and, the USA has the right to preemptively strike to protect this right. Eventually the whole world will be made up of democracies so that national sovereignty is not needed and borders can be erased. This idea is not overwhelmingly accepted by the US Republican party; instead the party tends to promote the “sovereignty of th United States.” Those who endorse this approach to the New World Order are commonly called Neoconservative; although they are not conservative in ideology.

Both of these groups want the same thing: the establishment of the New World Order and the loss of U.S. Sovereignty. Each group is willing to use force to establish the New World Order. President Clinton was able to use Human Interventionist (multicultural) ideology in both Bosnia and Kosovo to move this idea forward. Mr. Clinton was constantly waiting for permission from the United Nations to move forward. Ironically, Mr. Clinton used the religion of Islam with its warlike ideology as a catalyst of war and at the same time choosing to support the Islamic side in the conflict.

Historically, the multiculturalists have had it easy as the European Union has grown out of their ideas; and this has kept this group happy, thinking that their plan would continue to fruition.

The Globalists have had a harder time until George W. Bush became president of the United States. Iraq, Islam and terrorism has been used by Mr. Bush to move “preemption” and the “establishment of Democracy in the Middle East” forward. The Democrats are furious that under the Bush Doctrine Globalism has taken hold. Indeed, the hatred of the other camps ideas take priority over such concerns as national security; hence the hatred of George W. Bush and his war by the Democrats.

As history will attest, both groups are willing to use war and competing ideologies against each other to establish the New World Order. Indeed, both sides feel that they can use the Arabs because both sides believe they can control the Arabs.

The multiculturalists believe that once the Arabs have their own lands and identities along with the ending of poverty and the establishment of the Caliphate, the Arabs will settle in and be good citizens of the New World Order.

The Globalists feel that Arabs would settle in and be good New World Order citizens once they are “free” in their own democracies; and enjoying all that democracies can provide.

Both ideas are preposterous and horribly flawed. Islam of itself is the only world religion to accept violence as a tool for spreading that religion. The adherents of Islam are doctrinally charged with bringing the whole world into subjection to Sharia. Islam will not be manipulated or controlled; nor will it comply with the wishes of either New World Order group.

Hence these three hegemonic ideologies (Multiculturalists, Globalists, and Islam) are headed for conflict. Each is seeking world domination. Each looks for the destruction of the sovereignty of the United States.

For my part I say that we should stick with protecting and defending the Constitution of the United States and the people who believe in ideas like “all men are created equal” and are “endowed by their Creator with inalienable rights,” an idea that is diametrically opposed to all three of the above stated ideologies.

Homeworld by Harry Harrison

"Harrison has written a fast-moving political thriller, set in a believable future."

SYNOPSIS
First volume of the To The Stars trilogy. In this story of post-Twentieth Century Earth, Man has recovered from the disaster wrought by the Wasters who used up the planet's reserves of fossil fuels and overpopulated the planet. The all-powerful oligarchical governments which guided the people through the bad times have retained their powerful positions. The population of Britain is divided into two classes, the executive class and the proles. Unemployment runs at 90% among the proles, while the upper-class lives comfortably.

Jan Kulozik is an engineer from the upper class. Rescued from a boating accident by an Israeli spy-sub, he learns of Israel, the only remaining democratic state, where all men are equal. He begins to question his own role as a 'slave master', and becomes involved with the Israeli underground back in England.

Homeworld is a bleak future vision, a post-microchip version of Orwell's 1984, where the all powerful security forces watch every move and plot lives as though they are pawns in a chess game.

'To The Stars' comes from a line in the final, optimistic, speech at the end of the H.G. Wells film The Shape of Things To Come.

Everywhere we look there are attacks on the US sovergnity.

Some in government promote open borders and amnesty. Others detest illegal immigration and want the laws enforced. Who seems to be winning in this battle of maintaining control of borders and what/who crosses them?

NAFTA and the Trans MexAmeriCan highway establishing free movement from top to bottom of the continent are another example.

Some say we need to combine the UN with our military and with a unified front under a world banner, we can police the world. zOur money and troops, some lurch named kofi or kim gets to play general.

Key government officials get a free pass over corruption charges, while others are torn apart by fabricated criminal charges get all the attention.

Cities regulating whereand how high and how long an American Flag can fly, while allowing other national flags to wave proudly.

Free trade treaties, which usually give up some sovergnity in exchange for cheaper flow of goods.

Environmental laws restricting industrialized nations, but allowing industry to move to impoverished nations along with the jobs.

The UN cry for global disarmament of civilians.

The merging of many nations into a free trade zone, with common currency.

there are many many things that sound and look good, but when merged into the grand scheme of things over the long haul, spell big problems for our nation. of course, people with that vision are attacked by those in power as the lunatic fringe with tin foil hats.

There is a lot of misinformation and double speak within our government. Try getting a direct and straight answer from a politician and see if that is possible any more. When government shrouds is't actions and policys in secrecy, there is certainly a reason to be alarmed and concerned.

Here is your new world order. And I could care less what every devil, anti-christ, false prophet, politician, religious leader, scientist, Art Bell, etc. thinks. They ain't God, and they got nothing.

Understand also what the iron and the clay symbolize, modern industrial world, and old world culture, clashing as you describe.

Daniel 2

28 But there is a God in heaven that revealeth secrets, and maketh known to the king Nebuchadnezzar what shall be in the latter days. Thy dream, and the visions of thy head upon thy bed, are these;

29 As for thee, O king, thy thoughts came into thy mind upon thy bed, what should come to pass hereafter: and he that revealeth secrets maketh known to thee what shall come to pass.

30 But as for me, this secret is not revealed to me for any wisdom that I have more than any living, but for their sakes that shall make known the interpretation to the king, and that thou mightest know the thoughts of thy heart.

31 Thou, O king, sawest, and behold a great image. This great image, whose brightness was excellent, stood before thee; and the form thereof was terrible.

32 This image's head was of fine gold, his breast and his arms of silver, his belly and his thighs of brass,

33 His legs of iron, his feet part of iron and part of clay.

34 Thou sawest till that a stone was cut out without hands, which smote the image upon his feet that were of iron and clay, and brake them to pieces. (that small stone is the super empowered remnant of God that will be taking orders from General Jesus alone, and be totally impervious to anything man can throw at them, including, the biggest baddest nuclear bomb they could build. In other words, these people could skate on the Sun, like its an ice skating rink).

35 Then was the iron, the clay, the brass, the silver, and the gold, broken to pieces together, and became like the chaff of the summer threshingfloors; and the wind carried them away, that no place was found for them: and the stone that smote the image became a great mountain, and filled the whole earth. (the Kingdom of God filling the Earth)

36 This is the dream; and we will tell the interpretation thereof before the king.

37 Thou, O king, art a king of kings: for the God of heaven hath given thee a kingdom, power, and strength, and glory.

38 And wheresoever the children of men dwell, the beasts of the field and the fowls of the heaven hath he given into thine hand, and hath made thee ruler over them all. Thou art this head of gold.

39 And after thee shall arise another kingdom inferior to thee, and another third kingdom of brass, which shall bear rule over all the earth.

40 And the fourth kingdom shall be strong as iron: forasmuch as iron breaketh in pieces and subdueth all things: and as iron that breaketh all these, shall it break in pieces and bruise.

41 And whereas thou sawest the feet and toes, part of potters' clay, and part of iron, the kingdom shall be divided; but there shall be in it of the strength of the iron, forasmuch as thou sawest the iron mixed with miry clay.

42 And as the toes of the feet were part of iron, and part of clay, so the kingdom shall be partly strong, and partly broken.

43 And whereas thou sawest iron mixed with miry clay, they shall mingle themselves with the seed of men: but they shall not cleave one to another, even as iron is not mixed with clay.

44 And in the days of these kings shall the God of heaven set up a kingdom, which shall never be destroyed: and the kingdom shall not be left to other people, but it shall break in pieces and consume all these kingdoms, and it shall stand for ever.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.