Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

An Ear for Snipers
Popular Science ^ | January 2007 | Gregory Mone

Posted on 01/29/2007 12:09:44 AM PST by LibWhacker

A new robotic head can pinpoint the location of enemy shooters and call in the cavalry

The RedOwl is a robotic head that looks more like a PowerPoint projector than a sharpshooter’s worst enemy. But don’t let its Circuit City appearance fool you: Controlled by a laptop-wielding soldier, the RedOwl’s superior senses can read a nametag from across a football field and identify the make and model of a rifle fired a mile away simply by analyzing the sound of the distant blast. And soon it could be putting its powers to use in Iraq.

RedOwl’s developer, Glenn Thoren, now a director at Insight Technology in Londonderry, New Hampshire, says several prototypes have finished an intensive 10-week field test at Fort Benning in Georgia. Given the defense department’s budget approval early this year, he hopes the $150,000 sniper-finders will be in Iraq by this spring.

The robot’s mechanical ears were originally designed to improve hearing aides. But Thoren, then with Boston University’s Photonics Center, which heads the RedOwl project, thought up a new application after learning of a spike in sniper activity surrounding Iraqi hotspots like Abu Ghraib prison. He combined the original listening system—which processes sound received by four microphones to determine the direction and elevation of a noise—with a suite of sensors, spotlights and a laser rangefinder. When the RedOwl hears gunfire, it swivels its head toward the source of the noise. A thermal imager can pick out the sniper while an infrared spotlight illuminates him for night-vision-equipped troops.

Attached to a PackBot, a miniature robot tank built by iRobot in Burlington, Massachusetts, and steered by a modified Xbox videogame controller, the RedOwl can also enter dangerous buildings in advance of soldiers. “We’re hoping to put the robot in situations where it would be less safe for a soldier,” Thoren says.

HOW IT WORKS

1. EARS When a shot is fired, the incoming sound waves pass over four microphones, and a processor parses the data to pinpoint the source of the sound, all in a few milliseconds. The system can recognize weapons by their report, and thus ignore friendly fire.

2. EYES A central camera allows the remote operator to see where the RedOwl is going, and a powerful zoom cam enables the operator to study potential snipers without getting too close. RedOwl’s lasers can illuminate a target up to a mile away. Because the laser is infrared, the sniper won’t be aware he’s in the spotlight, but soldiers with night-vision goggles will see him perfectly.

3. MATH SKILLS A laser rangefinder bounces a beam off the target, and RedOwl calculates the intervening distance. Factoring in its own GPS position and using a magnetic compass to determine the direction in which it’s looking, RedOwl can figure out the location of a target 3,000 feet away, allowing troops to call in a precision air strike.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: antisniper; redowl; robot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

1 posted on 01/29/2007 12:09:45 AM PST by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Don't we have a similar system for locating enemy mortar teams? Hopefully, this one will work better.


2 posted on 01/29/2007 12:12:10 AM PST by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

That is cool!

The amount of new stuff we are fielding each year in Iraq is amazing.

Does anyone watch futureweapons on Discovery channel?

Great show and they are going to feature the F-22 on the new episode showing tonight.


3 posted on 01/29/2007 12:12:52 AM PST by volunbeer (Dear heaven.... we really need President Reagan again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

I have one of these in my platoon and it works really well....
Oh sorry, that's in a sci-fi game...
It's really great to see some of this stuff turning up in real life!


4 posted on 01/29/2007 12:13:36 AM PST by Uriah_lost (We've got enough youth, how about a "fountain of smart")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: volunbeer

I love that show! Recorded the one tonight. Going to watch it later.


5 posted on 01/29/2007 12:16:23 AM PST by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
We have gunshot detection cameras on top of light poles in Chicago...
6 posted on 01/29/2007 12:16:35 AM PST by endthematrix (Both poverty and riches are the offspring of thought.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: volunbeer
I love Futureweapons too!
This season looks to be off to a great start but the host seems to be getting a bit carried away with the melodramatic narrative....
I still love all the cool stuff and Tivo every episode for reference and ideas for my stories.(amateur sci-fi writer here)
7 posted on 01/29/2007 12:17:40 AM PST by Uriah_lost (We've got enough youth, how about a "fountain of smart")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
The "Owl" looks just like the "Cobra" in this Future Combat Systems Video. I also see iRobot's logo in the closing credits. (Warning: Long video requiring activeX, but well worth the effort to watch.)
8 posted on 01/29/2007 12:20:55 AM PST by DocRock (Nuke 'em till they glow, then shoot 'em in the dark)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DocRock
IRobot has a $51 million (was $32 mil) Future Combat Systems Contract .
9 posted on 01/29/2007 12:26:12 AM PST by endthematrix (Both poverty and riches are the offspring of thought.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Not sure how much they will actually feature the F-22 but I hope it's a good segment and a good look.

This story is another example of a little guy making great things for the military. If we were not in a war this stuff would never make it to the field because it was'nt made by a congressmans corporate friend.

Sad but true statement IMO.

I hope history remembers how much we benefitted in this conflict from letting the little guy and company put his ideas up against those of the established defense industry.


10 posted on 01/29/2007 12:31:45 AM PST by volunbeer (Dear heaven.... we really need President Reagan again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Uriah_lost

I agree that Mack seems to be getting a little carried away but it's obvious he is a technogeek and I don't think he is really acting!

What a cool show and some of the stuff they have shown seems like it came right out of a good sci-fi book.

I emailed them and asked them to do a segment on the Osprey. I realize it's an old platform that has had some problems but it sounds like they are finally working the kinks out.


11 posted on 01/29/2007 12:35:22 AM PST by volunbeer (Dear heaven.... we really need President Reagan again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: volunbeer
I watch Future Weapons too. I was watching the Discovery Science channel one night about the latest Mars surveillance satellite probe that was launched Jan. '06. Aboard that marvel of science is a radar that can look for water 1/2 mile below the surface. I am hoping they will employ this technology to detect underground booby traps, weapons bunkers, and hidden WMDs. The feature device in this post was also described by the Popular Science December (or November) issue.
12 posted on 01/29/2007 12:41:04 AM PST by jonrick46
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jonrick46

Why do I suspect something like that is already flying?

It is likely that something replaced the SR-71. My guess has been a UAV with stealth and considering we are worried about N. Korea, Iran, and we were worried about WMD in Iraq I am guessing if this thing really works it has probably been flying for awhile.

That's my guess but it sounds pretty cool. Hopefully we will share the coordinates with the Israelis since it appears we don't have the cajones to deal with Iran.


13 posted on 01/29/2007 12:47:28 AM PST by volunbeer (Dear heaven.... we really need President Reagan again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

I remember last year reading right here on FR about a company that was working on this - don't think it was the same one, though. Well, perhaps there are several. Actually after reading the article it doesn't sound all that challenging. I guess that is common with many great ideas.


14 posted on 01/29/2007 2:01:01 AM PST by Northern Alliance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
Red Owl's superior senses can identify the make and model of a rifle fired a mile away simply by analyzing the sound of the distant blast.

Huh? Cartridge maybe but make and model?

15 posted on 01/29/2007 3:07:04 AM PST by 03A3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 03A3
Well maybe barrel length, thickness, and receiver type. All those are part of the noise. the one thing it won't be able to tell however is the difference between one of our throw away Savage .308's and one of their "protect this glorious new technology with you life" Savage .308's.
16 posted on 01/29/2007 3:33:42 AM PST by tcostell (MOLON LABE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
I think the British developed a very early version of this system in the First World War to locate German guns... it was the 1910's Manhattan Project.
17 posted on 01/29/2007 3:43:44 AM PST by GAB-1955 (being dragged, kicking and screaming, into the Kingdom of Heaven....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
Factoring in its own GPS position and using a magnetic compass to determine the direction in which it’s looking...

The margin of error is too great for magnetic compasses, regardless of calibration. And *forget* about inclinometers for pitch and roll.

Wake me up when they have an onboard gyro - preferably a fibre optic ring gyro. :)

18 posted on 01/29/2007 3:56:56 AM PST by The Duke (I have met the enemy, and he is named 'Apathy'!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Anyone want to bet on how long it will take for the anti-gun mayor's to get some for their cities?


19 posted on 01/29/2007 5:18:19 AM PST by jim_trent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

GRRRREAT!


20 posted on 01/29/2007 5:35:48 AM PST by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson