Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Peach
You really are ignorant, aren't you? You're showing it in every post.

This from someone who can't even get her own damn facts straight.

What I'm showing, by talking about Reagan's record, which was far from perfect, is that in today's climate, you purists would be hysterical over Reagan's ascendancy in the party.

Bullcrap. Folks nowadays would be thrilled to see someone like Reagan in the race. You, however, seek to make your guy look bigger by making Reagan look smaller. All it does is show your own political mendacity.

258 posted on 01/28/2007 2:08:21 PM PST by dirtboy (Duncan Hunter 08 - rationalization not required, he IS a conservative already)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies ]


To: dirtboy
Folks nowadays would be thrilled to see someone like Reagan in the race.

Sure. Using some of the purist's own reasoning, here are reasons why Reagan couldn't get re-elected today: divorced, married Nancy while she was pregnant, 4 tax hikes, amnesty, ran from Lebanon, etc. It's a relatively long list. Reagan was great, but he wasn't perfect and you whiners want perfect. Good luck with that.

297 posted on 01/28/2007 2:51:58 PM PST by Peach (The Clintons pardoned more terrorists than they captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 258 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson