Skip to comments.
Impeachment: The Case in Favor
The Nation (Clue: it's not America.) ^
| January 25, 2007
| Elizabeth Holtzman
Posted on 01/26/2007 1:15:25 PM PST by Checkers
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-59 next last
Suck on that crack pipe, baby!
1
posted on
01/26/2007 1:15:27 PM PST
by
Checkers
To: Checkers
I though she meant Impeach Reggie Bush.
2
posted on
01/26/2007 1:18:07 PM PST
by
Perdogg
(Happy 2007)
To: Checkers
Damn these whining lefties are sore losers. First of all GW "stole" not one but two elections and now they want to impeach him when he hasn't broken the law. I am surprised they haven't tried to impeach the Diebold voting machines that keep not counting Dem. votes.
3
posted on
01/26/2007 1:19:01 PM PST
by
Rodney Kings Brain
("veritas odium parit" - "truth begets hatred")
To: Checkers
Failure to impeach Bush would condone his actions. I condone, I condone!!
4
posted on
01/26/2007 1:19:17 PM PST
by
marvlus
To: Checkers
Could this be a case of Obsessive/Compulsive behavior?
5
posted on
01/26/2007 1:20:39 PM PST
by
darkwing104
(Let's get dangerous)
To: Checkers
Hard to believe someone as twisted and warped as this one can get space in a publication. A deviational curse upon her and the horse she rode in on.
6
posted on
01/26/2007 1:20:50 PM PST
by
twonie
(Just because there are fewer of us don't mean we are wrong.)
To: Checkers
His impeachable offenses include using lies and deceptions to drive the country into war in Iraq, Guess we need to remove from office all the Democrats who also said intel showed Saddam had WMDs, except for the fact that none of them were lying - so neither was Bush.
deliberately and repeatedly violating the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) on wiretapping in the United States,
Except that Bush didn't.
and facilitating the mistreatment of US detainees in violation of the Geneva Conventions and the War Crimes Act of 1996.
Except that the Geneva Conventions don't apply to the thugs held at Gitmo - those are for uniformed combatants from signatory nations.
Three strikes and you're out, Liz. Ya gotta bring a better game than that.
7
posted on
01/26/2007 1:21:48 PM PST
by
dirtboy
(Duncan Hunter 08 - rationalization not required, he IS a conservative already)
To: twonie
Liberalism is a progressive (no pun intended) disease.
8
posted on
01/26/2007 1:29:18 PM PST
by
unkus
To: Checkers
9
posted on
01/26/2007 1:29:42 PM PST
by
HOTTIEBOY
(Campers laugh at clowns behind closed doors.)
To: Checkers
Don't. drink. the. blong. water. Elizabeth.
10
posted on
01/26/2007 1:30:30 PM PST
by
grandpa jones
(Responding To The Epic Threat)
To: Checkers
The Case in Favor? Two words:
Dick Cheney.
11
posted on
01/26/2007 1:30:58 PM PST
by
Steel Wolf
(As Ibn Warraq said, "There are moderate Muslims but there is no moderate Islam.")
To: Checkers
The ONLY issue I am upset about with Bush is the one on Illegal Immigration.
To: grandpa jones
13
posted on
01/26/2007 1:31:23 PM PST
by
grandpa jones
(Responding To The Epic Threat)
To: dirtboy
I called for a list of American citizens that Bush has spied on.
I am still waiting......
14
posted on
01/26/2007 1:36:30 PM PST
by
HOTTIEBOY
(Campers laugh at clowns behind closed doors.)
To: Checkers
President's failure to discharge his constitutional duty to help the people of New Orleans.
I must have missed that part?
Is this a new amendment that slipped through?
To: GrandEagle
President's failure to discharge his constitutional duty to help the people of New Orleans.
I must have missed that part?
Is this a new amendment that slipped through? Ah guess them there 14 billion dollars of federal money that were (unconstitutionally!) sent directly to New Orleans (what - are Mississippi and Alabama and upstate LA legally ignored?) don't count as helping New Orleans.
16
posted on
01/26/2007 1:42:55 PM PST
by
Robert A Cook PE
(I can only donate monthly, but Hillary's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
To: Checkers
The Supreme Court ruled that the Geneva Conventions apply to the treatment of detainees, 1) Even though it explicitly states that it doesn't; and
2) Even though the jurisdiction for the case was specifically removed from them, which they acknowledged and ruled anyways.
and a federal judge ruled that the President could not legally ignore FISA.
...And the FISA court ruled that he wasn't doing so.
17
posted on
01/26/2007 1:45:30 PM PST
by
lepton
("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
To: Checkers
Lizzie baby,
You are dilusional, Bush is not Nixon, and it's not 1974.
Madame, you are nothing but a common criminal. Your dealings with Fleet bank have resulted accusations about unethical behavior and special treatment for loans that you recieved from them.
Good luck with that impeachment thing. You're going to need it.
18
posted on
01/26/2007 1:50:33 PM PST
by
Ouderkirk
(Don't you think it's interesting how death and destruction seems to happen wherever Muslims gather.)
To: Checkers
Holtzmann is having flashbacks. Old radiclib Dems in Fantasyland.
19
posted on
01/26/2007 1:51:48 PM PST
by
popdonnelly
(Our first obligation is to keep the power of the Presidency out of the hands of the Clintons.)
To: Checkers
I heard Rosie O'Donnell saying the same the day after the SOTU address. Absolute garbage. These people are building their case of falsehood against President Bush with false statements. Rubbish!
I'm not a fan of GWB, but I'm impartial enough to recognize nothing has been put forth that would be grounds for impeachment proceedings. The advocates of impeachment intend to bring the entire government, not just the president, to its knees.
Since the Nixon years, impeachment has become all too often floated as a viable political tool in partisan politics. Forget it. Impeachment should only be considered when the high crime or misdemeanor is committed against the nation. I've seen no such acts committed by President Bush.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-59 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson