That did it for me too ... next prospective pubby.
Matters of conscience should be respected, and I agree with John that killing fetuses that would be viable outside the womb is some form of serious moral murder (welll maybe John does not quite agree with that, and is more "liberal" than I on this one, since he mentions just PBA, which I find a distraction as a locus of any import in and of itself; the line into grave "sin" in my mind is viability), unless the fetus threatens the mother with severe and demonstrable and court found physical harm (absent an emergency). (As an aside, the former sentence blows as prose big time, but I hope it makes some sense. It would NEVER make one of my legal briefs. :) )
But does it really matters what POTUS thinks on this issue? Does not what really matters is just whom the POTUS nominates for SCOTUS? Isn't THAT where the focus of attention should lie?