To: WestTexasWend
pond scum to biodiesel
Is there ongoing research on liquifying democrats?
2 posted on
01/24/2007 12:20:50 PM PST by
samtheman
To: WestTexasWend
If they can create energy sources from pond scum, can you just imagine what we could power with Democrats?
3 posted on
01/24/2007 12:20:59 PM PST by
TommyDale
(If we don't put a stop to this global warming, we will all be dead in 10,000 years!)
To: WestTexasWend
"Pond Scum to Biodiesel"
I just knew some day there would be a use for liberals.
4 posted on
01/24/2007 12:21:05 PM PST by
Bigh4u2
(Denial is the first requirement to be a liberal)
To: WestTexasWend; RedStateRocker; Dementon; eraser2005; Calpernia; DTogo; Maelstrom; Yehuda; ...
Renewable Energy Ping Please Freep Mail me if you'd like on/off
6 posted on
01/24/2007 12:21:28 PM PST by
Uncledave
To: WestTexasWend
Algae [...] can produce 100 times more oil per acre than conventional soil-tilled crops that are now being grown for biofuel useSo these other crops have less than 1% photosynthesis efficieny? I thought they were better than that ... better than solar cells, even, at ~10% or so.
8 posted on
01/24/2007 12:23:18 PM PST by
coloradan
(Failing to protect the liberties of your enemies establishes precedents that will reach to yourself.)
To: WestTexasWend
This makes more sense to me than other slower growing, more labor intensive biomass materials if they can get the output high enough.
9 posted on
01/24/2007 12:23:45 PM PST by
kinoxi
To: WestTexasWend
I read about this a year or so ago. The paper I read said this algae could be grown in the effluent of wastewater treatment plants piped to shallow ponds in desert areas. The paper claimed an area the size of Rhode Island would produce enough bio-diesel to fuel the existing U.S. diesel vehicle fleet. May have been a bit hyped.
11 posted on
01/24/2007 12:28:24 PM PST by
Brad from Tennessee
(Anything a politician gives you he has first stolen from you)
To: Red Badger
Ping - Your off your mark today...
13 posted on
01/24/2007 12:30:21 PM PST by
Abathar
(Proudly catching hell for posting without reading the article since 2004)
To: WestTexasWend
Useless. Pond scum will quickly be put on the endangered species list.
16 posted on
01/24/2007 12:36:11 PM PST by
saganite
(Billions and billions and billions-------and that's just the NASA budget!)
To: WestTexasWend; Red Badger
17 posted on
01/24/2007 12:49:11 PM PST by
Jedi Master Pikachu
( WND, NewsMax, Townhall.com, Brietbart.com, and Drudge Report are not valid news sources.)
To: WestTexasWend
Interesting, but I have one big question: won't this cut into our supply of fertilizer? You have to put some biological waste back into the soil or else you deplete it of its nutrients. What happens if we burn all our waste in our cars? Doesn't seem very sustainable to me.
To: WestTexasWend
Congress generates a lot of hot air from pond scum, so if we could just harness that hot air....
35 posted on
01/24/2007 4:11:34 PM PST by
Kevmo
(Darn, if only I had signed up 4 days earlier, I'd have a 3-digit Freeper #)
To: WestTexasWend
Pond scum?
What you hear is the sound of a shark jumping. The fuel diversity fad has reached critical mass. Willie Nelson is tipping over.
37 posted on
01/24/2007 6:34:28 PM PST by
gcruse
(http://garycruse.blogspot.com/)
To: WestTexasWend
Saw a similar setup on TV last night--I think on the History Channel.
It was in Arizona. The algae is/are (?) in transparent tubes angled to receive sunlight.
It sounded quite interesting.
To: WestTexasWend
52 posted on
07/19/2007 11:50:47 AM PDT by
southland
(Fred will win in '08)
To: WestTexasWend
53 posted on
07/19/2007 11:50:55 AM PDT by
southland
(Fred will win in '08)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson