Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Future power : pond scum to biodiesel; renewable fuels from algae
http://www.thecherrycreeknews.com/content/view/997/2/ ^ | Tuesday, 23 January 2007

Posted on 01/24/2007 12:18:48 PM PST by WestTexasWend

Pond scum may be an important component of the world's energy future.

Solix Biofuels Inc., a startup company based in Boulder, is working with Colorado State University engineers to commercialize technology that can cheaply mass produce oil derived from algae and turn it into biodiesel - an environmentally friendly solution to high gas prices, greenhouse gas emissions and volatile global energy markets.

Solix officials plan to commercialize the technology over the next two years. After ramping up to widespread production, the company expects to eventually compete commercially with the wholesale price of crude petroleum.

“We’re facing two global challenges: depletion of our petroleum reserves and a buildup of greenhouse gases,” said Bryan Willson, director of Colorado State's Engines and Energy Conversion Laboratory, which is helping Colorado State achieve its goal to lead the nation in developing and commercializing environmentally sustainable solutions to global problems. “This process harnesses photosynthesis to turn carbon dioxide and energy captured from the sun into an economical petroleum substitute.”

“Algae are the fastest growing organisms on the planet, and can produce 100 times more oil per acre than conventional soil-tilled crops that are now being grown for biofuel use,” said Solix founder Jim Sears.

Solix officials estimate that widespread construction of its photo-bioreactor system could meet the demand for the U.S. consumption of diesel fuel - about 4 million barrels a day - by growing algae on less than 0.5 percent of the U.S. land area, which is otherwise unused land adjacent to power plants and ethanol plants. The plants produce excess carbon dioxide, which is necessary to turn algae into oil. In addition to producing biodiesel, the process would prevent a large portion of the greenhouse gases produced by coal-burning power plants from being expelled directly into the atmosphere.

“Algae to biofuel technologies are still being developed, yet a strong case can be made for global domestication of algae as an energy crop,” said Doug Henston, chief executive officer of Solix. “We want to manage this technology to create a business that will serve current and future energy stakeholders.”

Colorado State and Solix officials are collaborating with New Belgium Brewing Co. to use excess carbon dioxide from the brewery’s plant to test the algae-based biodiesel process.

Solix is one of many companies doing business in northern Colorado because of its leadership in attracting clean and renewable energy companies and technology.

This spring, Colorado State and Solix participated in the creation of the Northern Colorado Clean Energy Cluster, a clearinghouse that connects entrepreneurs and major power users with researchers and government officials, encouraging innovation, new job creation and investment in the region. The Clean Energy Cluster has already produced several technology transfer opportunities including a new collaboration between Colorado State University's Engines and Energy Conversion Laboratory in the College of Engineering and Spirae Inc., a privately held company based in Fort Collins.

A majority of Colorado State’s eight colleges host faculty who are researching clean and renewable energy alternatives including Willson, who is a mechanical engineering professor in the College of Engineering. Also reinforcing the major role of Colorado State in the clean-energy arena is the recent formation of the Clean Energy Collaboratory between the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Colorado State, Colorado School of Mines and the University of Colorado.

"Commercialization partners such as Solix are critical to the successful transfer of laboratory innovations to the marketplace, and with the tremendous entrepreneurial interest in the Northern Colorado region, we expect to see Colorado State participating in many more startups,” said Mark Wdowik, vice president for Technology Transfer at Colorado State University Research Foundation - a private, non-profit foundation that aids the university in its research and educational efforts including the responsibility to protect and manage the intellectual property resulting from that research.

“We have already seen evidence of earlier commercialization successes from the engines lab, including Envirofit, a not-for-profit corporation created to commercialize reduced emissions technologies created by Dr. Willson and his colleagues, and we expect more to come,” Wdowik said.

The Solix collaboration is one example of Colorado State's emphasis, as stated in the university's Strategic Plan, to develop closer ties to the community and foster economic development via expeditious technology transfer and commercialization.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; US: Colorado
KEYWORDS: apoliticalpondscum; biodiesel; energy; renewableenergy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 last
To: TKDietz

It was my understanding that tilled crops turn something like 10% of incident solar energy into useable chemical energy, in which case, algae couldn't possibly be 100 times more efficient. You point out that algae can be grown year-round, as opposed to during one season, and now that you say it, I doubt that that factor was included in the 10% number that I recall. It might also be that tilled crops convert 10% of *absorbed* light into useful chemical energy, which is an additional inefficiency compared to *incident* light, and the algae could score another win there simply by being darker (which they often are).


41 posted on 01/25/2007 6:36:22 AM PST by coloradan (Failing to protect the liberties of your enemies establishes precedents that will reach to yourself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: WestTexasWend

Saw a similar setup on TV last night--I think on the History Channel.

It was in Arizona. The algae is/are (?) in transparent tubes angled to receive sunlight.

It sounded quite interesting.


42 posted on 01/25/2007 11:02:20 AM PST by TxGrandMom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WestTexasWend
there's not much demand for manure as fertilizer in the US anymore. It brings in too many weed seeds,

I thought they just baked the manure to kill off the seeds. Does that add too much to the cost?

43 posted on 01/25/2007 12:34:39 PM PST by Dumb_Ox (http://kevinjjones.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Dumb_Ox

Composting manure can kill some seeds, but baking won't work...if it gets too hot, it burns, and, in fact, if piled too deeply it will heat up on its own and spontaneously combust. Feedlots have to keep spreading it to keep this from happening...so, even after composting-in-place or mixing with other organics, weed seeds survive. The bigger knock against it is that chemical fertilizers are so much easier to apply, give more uniform distribution and usually require no tilling in, which saves on fuel/labor. Also, unlike manure, they don't stink for days or draw flies.


44 posted on 01/25/2007 1:37:04 PM PST by WestTexasWend (NO OIL FOR APPEASERS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: WestTexasWend
but there's not much demand for manure as fertilizer in the US anymore. It brings in too many weed seeds, and chemical fertilizers are easier to put down and provide more uniform in coverage.

Okay, so what are these chemical fertilizers made of, and how much energy does it take to produce them? Are those energy costs factored into the cost-benefit analysis?

45 posted on 01/26/2007 8:34:12 AM PST by curiosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: samtheman; Bigh4u2; TommyDale

Did anyone else read "pond scum" then AlGore instead of Algae?


46 posted on 01/26/2007 8:37:15 AM PST by CedarDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: curiosity

Chemical (inorganic) fertilizers are made up of components you'd find in organic fertilizer, minus organic matter. (That's why they can burn plants if there's not enough organic matter in the soil.) It's sort of like the difference between vitamins in pill form as opposed to vitamins present in food. (Here's a decent overview: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fertilizer)

Whatever money and energy is spent producing chemical fertilizers is easily recouped by being easier to store, transport, and market. Chemicals also let you control and customize the NPK ratio (among other things) for your specific crop. You can't be certain of the chemical makeup of organics, even from one truckload to the next.

Organics have great benefits, certainly, but just aren't clean, convenient or consistent enough for most modern growers.


47 posted on 01/26/2007 9:09:53 AM PST by WestTexasWend (NO OIL FOR APPEASERS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: WestTexasWend
Chemical (inorganic) fertilizers are made up of components you'd find in organic fertilizer, minus organic matter.

Okay, but where do you get those components? Don't they need the organic matter in order to chemically extract the nutrients? If not, where do they get them?

48 posted on 01/26/2007 5:23:58 PM PST by curiosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: jdsteel

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1116843/posts

Similar topic, pig manure and turkey guts.

Gensets being run off of offgas methane from digester ponds.


49 posted on 01/26/2007 5:41:36 PM PST by Fred Hayek (Liberalism is a mental disorder)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Frohickey

As far as energy production, I would count Democrats about the same as singularities. Beyond the end of the road.


50 posted on 01/26/2007 5:44:02 PM PST by Fred Hayek (Liberalism is a mental disorder)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: curiosity

No, you don't have to start with organic fertilizer to get fertilizer. Many components are mined from soil (sodium nitrate, mined "rock phosphate" and limestone...a calcium source, but mostly used to reduce soil acidity), while others are manufactured (some as by-products) or chemically-synthesized inorganic fertilizers. Those would include ammonium nitrate, potassium sulfate, and superphosphate, or triple superphosphate by-products.


.


51 posted on 01/26/2007 7:48:03 PM PST by WestTexasWend (NO OIL FOR APPEASERS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: WestTexasWend

bttt


52 posted on 07/19/2007 11:50:47 AM PDT by southland (Fred will win in '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WestTexasWend

bttt


53 posted on 07/19/2007 11:50:55 AM PDT by southland (Fred will win in '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson