Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/23/2007 8:52:27 PM PST by John W
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last
To: John W

I'd like to develop space factories which land on asteroids and process them into something useful. With a long enough lead time, why just move things around?


2 posted on 01/23/2007 8:56:18 PM PST by Vince Ferrer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John W
A tractor spacecraft would be a good idea.

You would need space docking and refueling. What would the propulsion system be? It would need to catch asteroids early enough that small changes in their orbits would translate to clean misses of earth. You can't do that in low earth orbit!

But just think of what it would mean to have a craft that could flit around the inner solar system with enough power to nudge asteroids! Just that technology alone could open up space travel!

3 posted on 01/23/2007 8:58:59 PM PST by Coyoteman (Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John W

Gravitational pull is determined by mass and distance. Distanc eisn't much of a problem but you're going to have to have a lot of mass to get the asteroid moved in time unless we can get far away from Earth to alter it's pass before it gets close.

Seems unrealistic but a novel idea anyways.


4 posted on 01/23/2007 8:59:58 PM PST by Bogey78O (Nifong's final appeal before St. Peter should get tossed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John W

A tractor of that magnitude would have to have a LOT of mass to make enough of a difference. Ping for later research


5 posted on 01/23/2007 9:03:20 PM PST by Danae (Anail nathrach, orth' bhais's bethad, do chel denmha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John W
For our great grandchildren bumping asteroids might be something you do on a dull Saturday afternoon.


6 posted on 01/23/2007 9:06:24 PM PST by capt. norm (Liberalism = cowardice disguised as tolerance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John W

7 posted on 01/23/2007 9:06:52 PM PST by fieldmarshaldj (Cheney X -- Destroying the Liberal Democrat Traitors By Any Means Necessary -- Ya Dig ? Sho 'Nuff.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John W

Comes with previous crash experience.

8 posted on 01/23/2007 9:07:35 PM PST by Mad_Tom_Rackham (Well, it's 2007. Time to get ready for 2008.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John W; Coyoteman; Bogey78O; Danae
A spacecraft of sufficient mass is sent to rendezvous with the asteroid and placed in a hover position to tow the asteroid with no physical attachment using just the micro-gravity attraction of the spacecraft mass as the towline. The gravity tractor, powered by nuclear-electric propulsion, would employ thrusters angled away from the asteroid to maintain hover distance and direction of tow.

The gravity tractor method is feasible if the threatening asteroid is detected early enough and at a sufficient distance from Earth. Based on calculations, it’s theorized that a 20 ton spacecraft could sufficiently deflect a typical 200 meter in diameter asteroid if given a lead time of 20 years. Deflecting a larger asteroid would require a spacecraft of greater mass or more lead time.

Whatever methods are employed to divert the trajectory of asteroids, early detection and better understanding of the objects are critical. That’s why there is great interest in funding increased efforts to explore known Near-Earth Orbit objects and search for presently undetected NEO objects.

9 posted on 01/23/2007 9:11:47 PM PST by Unmarked Package (Amazing surprises await us under cover of a humble exterior.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John W
space tractor

Space barge!

10 posted on 01/23/2007 9:16:21 PM PST by donna
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John W
If you can bump them away, you can bump them in too.

This makes nuclear war look like a schoolyard fight.

Who would be in control of the technology?
12 posted on 01/23/2007 9:19:31 PM PST by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John W; All

http://www.space.com/news/051103_asteroid_apophis.html

More info.....

Asteroid 99942 Apophis – first labeled as 2004 MN4 -- is estimated to be roughly 1,000 feet (320 meters) in diameter. Were it to strike Earth, it would not set off global havoc but would generate significant local or regional damage, experts say.

However

The ruin stemming from asteroid Apophis colliding with Earth would potentially be very great.

Indeed, the consequences, Schweickart suggested, would dwarf those seen as a result of the Indian Ocean tsunami in December 2004, hurricanes Katrina and Rita in September of this year, and the Pakistan earthquake last month.


13 posted on 01/23/2007 9:20:12 PM PST by perfect stranger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: b_sharp; neutrality; anguish; SeaLion; Fractal Trader; grjr21; bitt; KevinDavis; Momaw Nadon; ...
And for a bit further down the line: Recipe for Saving Earth - Move It.

FutureTechPing!
An emergent technologies list covering biomedical
research, fusion power, nanotech, AI robotics, and
other related fields. FReepmail to join or drop.

17 posted on 01/23/2007 9:37:52 PM PST by AntiGuv ("..I do things for political expediency.." - Sen. John McCain on FOX News)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

cant we just build a really cool laser? it would be more fun.


20 posted on 01/23/2007 9:40:38 PM PST by isom35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John W
Because the devastation would be great, the risk to a person of perishing in a major asteroid collision is about 1 in 10,000 or 20,000 over a 100-year lifetime - the same dying in a plane crash, Jedicke said.

I suspect that some very dubious and imprecise assumptions underlie the numbers in this probability calculation. How many asteroids? How big is each asteroid? Which year does each asteroid hit? How many people are in the area? Etc. Never mind that they're working from exactly zero previous similar events.

21 posted on 01/23/2007 9:44:17 PM PST by jiggyboy (Ten per cent of poll respondents are either lying or insane)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John W

But nuking them would be so-o-o-o much more cool!


23 posted on 01/23/2007 9:47:01 PM PST by lesser_satan (EKTHELTHIOR!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John W

Why not just blow it to flinders?


25 posted on 01/23/2007 9:49:56 PM PST by MistrX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John W
The idea I heard is to paint it. I believe if you paint it black, it slows down, white, it speeds up.

You have to admit, it's low maintenance compared to other methods, once the job is done. Then it's up to the Sun to do its thing.

29 posted on 01/23/2007 10:24:23 PM PST by Calvin Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John W

Mine it out so there won't even be a question of coming around to hit the planet.


41 posted on 01/24/2007 10:06:39 AM PST by RightWhale (Repeal the law of the excluded middle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John W

Bump for later reading


46 posted on 01/24/2007 11:38:53 AM PST by Kevmo (Darn, if only I had signed up 4 days earlier, I'd have a 3-digit Freeper #)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John W
The technology has been around since the '70s....


48 posted on 01/24/2007 1:22:40 PM PST by Joe 6-pack (Voted Free Republic's Most Eligible Bachelor: 2006. Love them Diebold machines.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson