Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

(Ron) Paul for President? (Reason interview)
Reason ^ | 1/22/07 | Brian Doherty

Posted on 01/23/2007 9:23:18 AM PST by traviskicks

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last

1 posted on 01/23/2007 9:23:19 AM PST by traviskicks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: traviskicks; Abram; albertp; AlexandriaDuke; Alexander Rubin; Allosaurs_r_us; Americanwolf; ...
Libertarian ping! To be added or removed from my ping list freepmail me or post a message here.
2 posted on 01/23/2007 9:24:19 AM PST by traviskicks (http://www.neoperspectives.com/Ron_Paul_2008.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: traviskicks

To contribute to Ron Paul's Presidential Exploration Committee visit: http://www.ronpaul.org/

Please send a contribution by personal check to:

Ron Paul 2008 PEC
837 W. Plantation Drive
Clute, TX 77531


3 posted on 01/23/2007 9:25:04 AM PST by traviskicks (http://www.neoperspectives.com/Ron_Paul_2008.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: traviskicks

I am suppoting Duncan Hunter, but if not him then Rep Paul would be my number 2.


4 posted on 01/23/2007 9:26:08 AM PST by Hydroshock ( (Proverbs 22:7). The rich ruleth over the poor, and the borrower is servant to the lender.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Hydroshock

What Mullah is he going to pick as his running mate?


5 posted on 01/23/2007 9:28:39 AM PST by Patrick1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: traviskicks

He'll have to run as a third party candiate. There's no way in hell the liberal GOP will nominate him.


6 posted on 01/23/2007 9:29:02 AM PST by Spirochete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: traviskicks

Wrong on the issues:

Opposes capital punishment

Voted against the Patriot Act

An isolationist like Pat Buchanan

Thinks the Iraq war was to curtain civil liberties

No thanks.


7 posted on 01/23/2007 9:29:23 AM PST by Peach (The Clintons pardoned more terrorists than they captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: traviskicks

I'm glad that Ron Paul has been able to get and keep himself elected.

But most of the LP is absolutely looney tunes.


8 posted on 01/23/2007 9:32:52 AM PST by angkor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: traviskicks

If you really want to lose, nominate Paul. Do it for Paul! Do it for Paul!!


9 posted on 01/23/2007 9:34:23 AM PST by dc-zoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #10 Removed by Moderator

To: traviskicks

What is Ron Paul's plan for Social Security and Medicare?


11 posted on 01/23/2007 9:38:16 AM PST by bluebeak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dc-zoo

I'd rather lose with Ron Paul than "win" with McCain, Gulliani, or Romney.


12 posted on 01/23/2007 9:38:39 AM PST by shempy (EABOF)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Hydroshock

I'm hoping Duncan Hunter will consider Ron Paul as a running mate.


13 posted on 01/23/2007 9:39:17 AM PST by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: traviskicks

Ron Paul for President. Accept no substitutes.


14 posted on 01/23/2007 9:39:59 AM PST by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: traviskicks

If he ends up not running, I'm writing him in.


15 posted on 01/23/2007 9:41:02 AM PST by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: traviskicks

This article incorrectly lables Congressman Walter Jones as a Democrat. He is a Republican.

Anyhow, Paul is the only candidate other then Hagel for whom I'll vote for a D instead. If we are going to cut-and-run in the WOT, I'd rather do it when a D is President so they will get blamed for the inevitable.


16 posted on 01/23/2007 9:41:16 AM PST by zbigreddogz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia

The sooner the better, it would give both more traction to get their message out.


17 posted on 01/23/2007 9:44:51 AM PST by Hydroshock ( (Proverbs 22:7). The rich ruleth over the poor, and the borrower is servant to the lender.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Spirochete
He'll have to run as a third party candidate. There's no way in hell the liberal GOP will nominate him.

So be it.

The gop did so well by ramming it's big government, waste, fraud, and corruption platform down the throats of the voting public last time, that it is a certainty that they can be just as successful this time around.
18 posted on 01/23/2007 9:47:46 AM PST by WhiteGuy (GOP Congress - 16,000 earmarks costing US $50 billion in 2006 - PAUL2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: traviskicks

I can't get onboard with someone who believes that we should wait to be nuked before offering a "proportional" response. Battles can't be won by playing tit for tat against an enemy with no borders.


19 posted on 01/23/2007 9:49:14 AM PST by jess35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Peach

Speak for yourself. Those all look like correct stances to me.


20 posted on 01/23/2007 10:01:09 AM PST by MinnesotaLibertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson