Skip to comments.
(Ron) Paul for President? (Reason interview)
Reason ^
| 1/22/07
| Brian Doherty
Posted on 01/23/2007 9:23:18 AM PST by traviskicks
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-67 next last
To: traviskicks; Abram; albertp; AlexandriaDuke; Alexander Rubin; Allosaurs_r_us; Americanwolf; ...
Libertarian ping! To be added or removed from my ping list freepmail me or post a message here.
2
posted on
01/23/2007 9:24:19 AM PST
by
traviskicks
(http://www.neoperspectives.com/Ron_Paul_2008.htm)
To: traviskicks
To contribute to Ron Paul's Presidential Exploration Committee visit: http://www.ronpaul.org/
Please send a contribution by personal check to:
Ron Paul 2008 PEC
837 W. Plantation Drive
Clute, TX 77531
3
posted on
01/23/2007 9:25:04 AM PST
by
traviskicks
(http://www.neoperspectives.com/Ron_Paul_2008.htm)
To: traviskicks
I am suppoting Duncan Hunter, but if not him then Rep Paul would be my number 2.
4
posted on
01/23/2007 9:26:08 AM PST
by
Hydroshock
( (Proverbs 22:7). The rich ruleth over the poor, and the borrower is servant to the lender.)
To: Hydroshock
What Mullah is he going to pick as his running mate?
5
posted on
01/23/2007 9:28:39 AM PST
by
Patrick1
To: traviskicks
He'll have to run as a third party candiate. There's no way in hell the liberal GOP will nominate him.
To: traviskicks
Wrong on the issues:
Opposes capital punishment
Voted against the Patriot Act
An isolationist like Pat Buchanan
Thinks the Iraq war was to curtain civil liberties
No thanks.
7
posted on
01/23/2007 9:29:23 AM PST
by
Peach
(The Clintons pardoned more terrorists than they captured or killed.)
To: traviskicks
I'm glad that Ron Paul has been able to get and keep himself elected.
But most of the LP is absolutely looney tunes.
8
posted on
01/23/2007 9:32:52 AM PST
by
angkor
To: traviskicks
If you really want to lose, nominate Paul. Do it for Paul! Do it for Paul!!
9
posted on
01/23/2007 9:34:23 AM PST
by
dc-zoo
Comment #10 Removed by Moderator
To: traviskicks
What is Ron Paul's plan for Social Security and Medicare?
11
posted on
01/23/2007 9:38:16 AM PST
by
bluebeak
To: dc-zoo
I'd rather lose with Ron Paul than "win" with McCain, Gulliani, or Romney.
12
posted on
01/23/2007 9:38:39 AM PST
by
shempy
(EABOF)
To: Hydroshock
I'm hoping Duncan Hunter will consider Ron Paul as a running mate.
13
posted on
01/23/2007 9:39:17 AM PST
by
Calpernia
(Breederville.com)
To: traviskicks
Ron Paul for President. Accept no substitutes.
14
posted on
01/23/2007 9:39:59 AM PST
by
mysterio
To: traviskicks
If he ends up not running, I'm writing him in.
15
posted on
01/23/2007 9:41:02 AM PST
by
mysterio
To: traviskicks
This article incorrectly lables Congressman Walter Jones as a Democrat. He is a Republican.
Anyhow, Paul is the only candidate other then Hagel for whom I'll vote for a D instead. If we are going to cut-and-run in the WOT, I'd rather do it when a D is President so they will get blamed for the inevitable.
To: Calpernia
The sooner the better, it would give both more traction to get their message out.
17
posted on
01/23/2007 9:44:51 AM PST
by
Hydroshock
( (Proverbs 22:7). The rich ruleth over the poor, and the borrower is servant to the lender.)
To: Spirochete
He'll have to run as a third party candidate. There's no way in hell the liberal GOP will nominate him.
So be it.
The gop did so well by ramming it's big government, waste, fraud, and corruption platform down the throats of the voting public last time, that it is a certainty that they can be just as successful this time around.
18
posted on
01/23/2007 9:47:46 AM PST
by
WhiteGuy
(GOP Congress - 16,000 earmarks costing US $50 billion in 2006 - PAUL2008)
To: traviskicks
I can't get onboard with someone who believes that we should wait to be nuked before offering a "proportional" response. Battles can't be won by playing tit for tat against an enemy with no borders.
19
posted on
01/23/2007 9:49:14 AM PST
by
jess35
To: Peach
Speak for yourself. Those all look like correct stances to me.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-67 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson