Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/23/2007 9:23:19 AM PST by traviskicks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: traviskicks; Abram; albertp; AlexandriaDuke; Alexander Rubin; Allosaurs_r_us; Americanwolf; ...
Libertarian ping! To be added or removed from my ping list freepmail me or post a message here.
2 posted on 01/23/2007 9:24:19 AM PST by traviskicks (http://www.neoperspectives.com/Ron_Paul_2008.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: traviskicks

He'll have to run as a third party candiate. There's no way in hell the liberal GOP will nominate him.


6 posted on 01/23/2007 9:29:02 AM PST by Spirochete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: traviskicks

Wrong on the issues:

Opposes capital punishment

Voted against the Patriot Act

An isolationist like Pat Buchanan

Thinks the Iraq war was to curtain civil liberties

No thanks.


7 posted on 01/23/2007 9:29:23 AM PST by Peach (The Clintons pardoned more terrorists than they captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: traviskicks

I'm glad that Ron Paul has been able to get and keep himself elected.

But most of the LP is absolutely looney tunes.


8 posted on 01/23/2007 9:32:52 AM PST by angkor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: traviskicks

If you really want to lose, nominate Paul. Do it for Paul! Do it for Paul!!


9 posted on 01/23/2007 9:34:23 AM PST by dc-zoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: traviskicks

What is Ron Paul's plan for Social Security and Medicare?


11 posted on 01/23/2007 9:38:16 AM PST by bluebeak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: traviskicks

Ron Paul for President. Accept no substitutes.


14 posted on 01/23/2007 9:39:59 AM PST by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: traviskicks

If he ends up not running, I'm writing him in.


15 posted on 01/23/2007 9:41:02 AM PST by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: traviskicks

I can't get onboard with someone who believes that we should wait to be nuked before offering a "proportional" response. Battles can't be won by playing tit for tat against an enemy with no borders.


19 posted on 01/23/2007 9:49:14 AM PST by jess35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: traviskicks

why doesn't Ron run as a Republican? he runs as a republican for his house seat!


21 posted on 01/23/2007 10:01:18 AM PST by Thomas Jefferson II (If we could harness the energy from our fore-fathers spinning in their graves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: traviskicks

Reckon ol' Paul will honor his term limit pledge from years past?...... I doubt it since he came back to the gov't tit.


22 posted on 01/23/2007 10:01:47 AM PST by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: traviskicks

Libertarians suffer at the polls because they overstate their case. They need to learn that those who demand everything up front seldom get what they want, and those who use gradualism to achieve their ends usually get a lot of what they want.

So Libertarians should pick a top 10 list of relatively small changes that are tremendously popular with the public.

It worked very well with the Contract with America, for the reason that it succinctly said, "This is what we will do." People understood it, it made sense.

No hedging, no waffling, just easy to understand straight talk.

Make it clear that even if Libertarians win, they will still by far be the minority. So they don't take issues to Washington that they *demand*, or will try to *force*. Instead take issues that Libertarians can *persuade* the other political parties to pass.

For example, right now, many of the security efforts that were implemented at the start of 911 are becoming unpopular.

The Libertarians could latch on to this and say "Elect us and we will try to convince the democrats and republicans to discard lots of these unnecessary and oppressive laws."

Be loud and clear that the Libertarians, if not centrists, can effectively be the in the center between the two major parties: to become the SWING vote. And that is a position of real power.

With as few as 15-20 seats in the House of Representatives, and 3-4 Senators, the Libertarians could completely reshape the direction of the country.

They could bargain with both parties for over-representation in committees, in exchange for their votes, and even start to take presidential cabinet posts.

It would break up the political bi-opoly that has dominated our landscape for too long.

Convey this to the people. Let them know that if they elect a Libertarian candidate, their State could become far more powerful than it is, with minor democrat and republican representatives.

Finally, since there are always weak office holders, the Libertarians should develop a pool of strong candidates to run against the major parties weak ones. Then the national party should invest much of its resources on these small wins.

Remember, they only need a small number of seats to really matter, so this is the way to go. Don't start by running a strong presidential candidate, start by electing dog catchers.


35 posted on 01/23/2007 10:57:01 AM PST by Popocatapetl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson