Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush expected to stress energy security (More ethanol?)
ap via yahoo ^ | 01/22/2007 | milwguy

Posted on 01/22/2007 7:53:26 AM PST by milwguy

For that, Bush told a renewable fuels conference last year in St. Louis, "we need to change how we power our automobiles. ... I like the idea of promoting a fuel that relies upon our farmers."

Bush has supported lawmakers' push to use more corn-based ethanol as a gasoline blend and he is expected to call for a sharp escalation of ethanol use in his speech.

It is a political sure bet as ethanol has widespread bipartisan support.

Among the first bills introduced in the new Democratic-run Senate calls for using 60 billion gallons of ethanol, 10 times current production capacity, by 2030.

Two 2008 presidential hopefuls, Democratic Sens. Barack Obama (news, bio, voting record) of Illinois and Joe Biden of Delaware, are its leading co-sponsors.

Ethanol is "riding a big wave" this year, says Mark McMinimy, a policy analyst at the Stanford Group. "The renewable fuels-ethanol juggernaut enjoys one of the most prized commodities in Washington — broad-based support, bipartisan political momentum


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government
KEYWORDS: bush; congree; ethanol; renewableenergy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 next last
To: milwguy
You can make corn flakes out of the waste product of ethanol?

Yes. It's not waste product, it's called 'co-products'.

WHAT'S IN A BUSHEL OF CORN?

Each bushel of corn can produce up to 2.5 gallons of ethanol fuel.  Only the 
starch from the corn is used to make ethanol.  Most of the substance of the 
corn kernel remains, leaving the protein and valuable co-products to be used
in the production of food for people, livestock feed, and various chemicals.  
For example, that same bushel of corn (56 lbs.) used in ethanol manufacturing 
can also produce the following: 

The wet-milling process:

 

The dry-milling process:

31.5 pounds of starch

 

10 one-lb. boxes of cereal

or

 

and

33 lbs. of sweetner

 

15 lbs. of brewer grits
 (enough for 1 gal. of beer)

or

 

and

2.5 gal. fuel ethanol

 

10 eight oz. packages
of Cheese Curls

and

 

and

12.4 lbs. of 21% protein feed

 

1 lb. of pancake mix

and

 

and

3.0 lbs. of 60% gluten meal

 

22 lbs. of hominy feed
for livestock

and

 

and

1.5 lbs. of corn oil

 

0.7 lbs. of corn oil

and

 

and

17 lbs. of carbon dioxide

 

17 lbs. of carbon dioxide

The corn oil is used in producing food for human consumption.  For example, 
1.5 lbs of corn oil from a bushel of corn is equivalent to 2 lbs of margarine.  
The 21% protein feed is used in making high protein livestock feed.  The 
carbon dioxide is used as a refrigerant, in carbonated beverages, to help 
vegetable crops to grow more rapidly in greenhouses, and to flush oil wells.  
Only the starch of the corn (carbon, hydrogen, and oxygen) is used to make ethanol.  

21 posted on 01/22/2007 8:26:00 AM PST by Keith in Iowa (Liberals: First to demand tolerance, last to practice it when conservatives disagree with them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Keith in Iowa

"In terms of renewable fuels, ethanol is the worst solution," Patzek says. "It has the highest energy cost with the least benefit."

Ethanol is produced by fermenting renewable crops like corn or sugarcane. It may sound green, Patzek says, but that's because many scientists are not looking at the whole picture. According to his research, more fossil energy is used to produce ethanol than the energy contained within it.


22 posted on 01/22/2007 8:30:23 AM PST by milwguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: taxed2death

>>>Does ethanol have to be produced from corn?

No.

Many other things can be used to make ethanol - even the left-overs from growing corn...Iowa State is working on equipment that catches & bundles what's left after the combine harvests the corn kernels to be used in producing ethanol.


23 posted on 01/22/2007 8:30:28 AM PST by Keith in Iowa (Liberals: First to demand tolerance, last to practice it when conservatives disagree with them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: milwguy

>>>Patzek says.

Please. He's a liberal, oil industry shill who's research and data used to reach his conclusions used decades old assumptions about farming that are no longer true.


24 posted on 01/22/2007 8:32:49 AM PST by Keith in Iowa (Liberals: First to demand tolerance, last to practice it when conservatives disagree with them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Keith in Iowa
What I DON'T like is the billions of dollars of subsidies ethanol has received....if it was viable, wouldn't private investors flock to it?

Every dollar that stays in this country rather than go to some islamo-fascist who wants to end our way of life because that dollar is spent on ethanol rather than oil is a good thing in my book.

So why not drill for oil or use clean coal technology here? I'm all for keeping energy dollars here.

25 posted on 01/22/2007 8:33:12 AM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist (Forgot your tagline? Click here)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Brad Cloven

What happens when we have a drought? Simple law of supply and demand dictates that price rises, some get richer, most get poorer. Ethanol is a booondoggle only the gov't could love. Rather than extract oil and gas from our maasive reserves in Alaska, off the west coast, off the coast of florida, we prefer to produce an inferior fuel, which will raise the price of food, is subject to the whims of the weather, and uses as much energy as it produces. France gets over 80% of their electricity from nuclear, China is building coal polluting electric plants left and right, and has plans for 50 nuclear plants, but we in the US fiddle with ethanol while our competition laughs at us and goes about their merry way digging up oil sands, producing dirty coal plants, or drilling everywhere they can.


26 posted on 01/22/2007 8:36:49 AM PST by milwguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: milwguy

I agree with you. They may as well call this the Farm Bill version 2.0, since this is nothing more than a sop to major agribusiness interests.


27 posted on 01/22/2007 8:37:06 AM PST by Alberta's Child (Can money pay for all the days I lived awake but half asleep?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Keith in Iowa

The basic premise of "energy independence" has been exposed here on FreeRepublic as a complete fraud. We are no more capable of being "energy independent" than we are of being "cheap Chinese import independent," "Mexican immigrant independent," etc.


28 posted on 01/22/2007 8:39:10 AM PST by Alberta's Child (Can money pay for all the days I lived awake but half asleep?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Keith in Iowa

High corn prices are wreaking havoc on Mexico's inflation rate and forcing shoppers to pay more for eggs, milk and tortillas


29 posted on 01/22/2007 8:41:22 AM PST by milwguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Keith in Iowa
Every dollar that stays in this country rather than go to some islamo-fascist who wants to end our way of life because that dollar is spent on ethanol rather than oil is a good thing in my book.

Oh, sure.

The U.S. hasn't imported any oil from Iran in several decades -- but that hasn't kept Iran from being the #4 producer of oil in the world.

30 posted on 01/22/2007 8:41:47 AM PST by Alberta's Child (Can money pay for all the days I lived awake but half asleep?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
"a sop to major agribusiness interests"

In addition, the local (Fargo, ND) corn farmers are buying Corvettes!

31 posted on 01/22/2007 8:42:27 AM PST by Uncle Miltie (McCain / Feingold - 2008 ... "Shut Up or Go To Prison")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Keith in Iowa

Yeah 5500 lbs of the leftover produces all of 180 gallons of ethanol. The tradeoff is more erosion of topsoil and reduced future yields.


32 posted on 01/22/2007 8:42:57 AM PST by milwguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: milwguy
We need a ban on NIMBYism for energy producing projects of all kinds. If we set up a uniform set of regulations for each type of energy producer, covering safety, siting, emissions, and other impacts. Anybody who could raise private capital to build an energy project that met the guidelines for its type could build it, with NIMBY groups having no standing to oppose it. Your HOA could not object to solar cells on the roof of your home, and Greenpeace would not be able to stop a nuclear reactor.
33 posted on 01/22/2007 9:02:23 AM PST by BlazingArizona (co)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: milwguy
For that, Bush told a renewable fuels conference last year in St. Louis, "we need to change how we power our automobiles. ... I like the idea of promoting a fuel that relies upon our farmers."

I like the idea of relying on American technology and innovation. W never has liked our technology sector.

34 posted on 01/22/2007 9:21:19 AM PST by Moonman62 (The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kinghorse

Yes, batteries are the key to using multiple sources of energy.


35 posted on 01/22/2007 9:22:10 AM PST by Moonman62 (The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62

Because they are renewable? Oil will be used to re-charge the main power plant, battery power. It's opposite today.


36 posted on 01/22/2007 9:34:36 AM PST by kinghorse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: kinghorse

by oil I mean refined gasoline. carbon based combustibles.


37 posted on 01/22/2007 9:35:15 AM PST by kinghorse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Keith in Iowa
The carbon dioxide is used as a refrigerant, in carbonated beverages, to help vegetable crops to grow more rapidly in greenhouses,

You're saying the ethanol producers bottle up their CO2 and sell it?

38 posted on 01/22/2007 10:24:42 AM PST by Uncledave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Uncledave
You're saying the ethanol producers bottle up their CO2 and sell it?

Yes, those producers with plants designed to do so are - one is Broin.

39 posted on 01/22/2007 11:21:02 AM PST by Keith in Iowa (Liberals: First to demand tolerance, last to practice it when conservatives disagree with them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

This reminds me of the tobbaco silliness. Preach to us about how we are not to use it, but don't ban it, just tax the hell out of it. Same deal with gas. We're told we're "addicted to it" ,yet our gubmint collects $41 billion a year in taxes on it. How much do they collect from
"big ethanol" in taxes??


40 posted on 01/23/2007 4:21:58 PM PST by Rakkasan1 ((Illegal immigrants are just undocumented friends you haven't met yet!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson