Moneyman Soros Dumps Her for Obama (Dumps Hillary for Obama)

NY Daily News ^ | 1/22/07

[sgtbono2002]

I always thought Hillary was American enemy Number one. Now I have to rethink things.\

If Soros is for Obama then Obama is even worse than I thought.

[windchime]

Is the NY Daily News Clinton friendly? Perhaps this report is Clinton generated and intended to distance her from Soros in the voters' eyes.

The Clinton/Soros alliance has existed for many years. I find it hard to believe Soros would abandon a mutually beneficial alliance in support of a candidate who, on the surface, has little to offer.

[cricket]

Whatever. . .when push comes to shove he'll come back to 'shove'. . .

[conservatism_IS_compassion]

her historic presidential announcement

"Historic?"

Shouldn't she at least win the Democratic nomination before her presidential announcement is "historic?"

Unless you want to say that she is the person with the most questionable ethics ever to announce for the presidency . . .

[cricket]

Soros' money won't change Obama's Islamic heritage.

If he had wanted to be President; he should have changed his name for starters. . .but yes; there are some things you cannot change here.

But hey; the 'time is young'; a few more Keith Ellison's and then who knows. . .

[areafiftyone]

That's gotta be a typo - I think they meant HYSTERIC! LOL!

[nw_arizona_granny]

Is the NY Daily News Clinton friendly? Perhaps this report is Clinton generated and intended to distance her from Soros in the voters' eyes. <<<

You read my mind.

[nw_arizona_granny]

Ping.

[Calpernia]

Soros didn't dump Obama or Hillary. This is just adding drama to hollywoodize the political show.

He actually has 3 funded RINO republicans, Obama and Hillary for the 2008 race.

[Sword_Svalbardt]

Don't believe it for an instant.

[Vigilanteman]

Soros already owns a number of Senators and Congressmen including Jason Altmeyer and Jon Tester. The next logical purchase is the presidency. While the Clintons and Soros have a number of issues in common, the Clinton's loyalty is ultimately to the Clintons.

While Obama will be an obedient lapdog for Soros, the Clintons will be cagey cats.

[windchime]

Some of us just know which rocks to look under. ;)

[windchime]

Can you say which RINOS he's funding?

[Calpernia]

ping to me for later

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1771625/posts?page=53#53

[SmithL]

Soros must figure that he's got too much money to commit Arkancide.

[Fawn]

Oh brother. Who in their right mind would put a muslim in the Presidency of the USA?
Oh crap.
I guess these people would:

Photo taken with a cell phone cam of TV coverage on MLK day from Corpus

[Thunder90]

Soros is backing the nutroots and Obama for a reason. The majority of the Dim party sees Hillary as a "DINO", being pro-war, and being too close to Bush.

[rickdylan]

Of the plausible demmy candidates, Hillary is the only one with the organization, infrastructure, and experience to simply kill people who get in her way. That makes up for a lot of deficiencies in other areas, and nobody should believe that adding Soros' name to the list along with Obama's would bother her much.

[Thunder90]

Probably. It has to do with Hillary's precieved suppport for the Iraq war and being not far left enough that has Soros and Moveon.org angry with her.

[AmishDude]

My theory is that the Clintons are enabling the Oboomlet. This allows Hillary to edge out any real competition and shields her from criticism while the media focuses on Obama.