Posted on 01/21/2007 9:49:11 PM PST by Mia T
HILLARY "I'm in" CLINTON'S 'CONVERSATION' WITH SELF
|
... While America appears not to be ready for a female president under any circumstances, the post-9/11 realities pose special problems for a female presidential candidate. Add to these the problems unique to missus clinton. The reviews make the mistake of focusing on the problems of the generic female presidential candidate running during ordinary times.
These are not ordinary times. America is waging the global War on Terror; the uncharted territory of asymmetric netherworlds is the battlefield; the enemy is brutal, subhuman; the threat of global conflagration is real.
Defeating the enemy isn't sufficient. For America to prevail, she must also defeat a retrograde, misogynous mindset. To successfully prosecute the War on Terror, it is essential that the collective patriarchal islamic culture perceives America as politically and militarily strong. Condi Rice excepted, this requirement presents an insurmountable hurdle for any female presidential candidate, and especially missus clinton, historically antimilitary--(an image, incidentally, that is only enhanced today by her clumsy, termagant parody of Thatcher), forever the pitiful victim, and, according to Dick Morris, "the biggest dove in the clinton administration."
It is ironic that had the clintons not failed utterly to fight terrorism... not failed to take bin Laden from Sudan... not failed repeatedly to decapitate a nascent, still stoppable al Qaeda... the generic female president as a construct would still be viable... missus clinton's obstacles would be limited largely to standard-issue clintonisms: corruption, abuse, malpractice, malfeasance, megalomania, rape and treason... and, in spite of Juanita Broaddrick, or perhaps because of her, Rod Lurie would be reduced to perversely hawking the "First Gentleman" instead of the "Commander-in-Chief." |
December 7, 1941+64
AN OPEN LETTER TO AMERICANS
RE: a not-so-modest proposal concerning hillary clinton
Hillary Clinton's revisionist tome notwithstanding, 'living history' begets a certain symmetry. It is in that light that I make this not-so-modest proposal on this day, exactly 64 years after the attack on Pearl Harbor.
The context of our concern today--regardless of political affiliation--is Iraq and The War on Terror, but the larger fear is that our democracy may not survive.
We have the requisite machines, power and know-how to defeat the enemy in Iraq and elsewhere, but do we have the will?
In particular, do we have the will to identify and defeat the enemy in our midst?
Answerable to no one, heir apparent in her own mind, self-serving in the extreme, Hillary Clinton incarnates this insidious new threat to our survival.
What we decide to do about Missus Clinton will tell us much about what awaits us in these perilous new times.
COMPLETE LETTER |
COPYRIGHT MIA T 2007
Hillary's announcement video is one of the most extraordinary pieces of political theatre I've ever seen. The production values were first-rate. Every word of her script was painstakingly crafted. The modulation of her voice, her head-nodding and her hand gestures were carefully controlled for effect. The swaying camera movement seems to be intricately synchronized with her script to evoke a sense of warmth, intimacy, sentimentality and sycophantic agreement in the viewer. This is a far more sophisticated piece of political propaganda than Harry Thomason ever produced.
Mia T, let me see if I have this right, you don't care a lot for Hillary, do you? I'd say you agree she is a monster. Pure and simple, a monster.
Everything about this woman is fake. Even her eye color. She has brown eyes, and wears blue contact enses to give her the appearance of having blue eyes.
Especially when he puts his slimy arm around her and looks smiling down into her adoring face (yuk barf) and the bubble above his head reads, "Maybe I'll get the chance to desecrate the Oval Office again. That would be such fun. I better work on finding the next "blue dress"."
bttt
yeah, like all that baggage under those eyes...
Exactly so!
I noticed how when W was trying to push Social Security reform to ensure its solvency the Democrats where saying it didn't need fixing. Now, with a new election coming, that old horse is brought back out of the barn.
There's not much doubt in my mind that Hillary could win but what kind of country will America be during her reign. As shrill as the Dems have been out of power and just how they've acted in their first couple of weeks back in power, if you thought the Clinton criminal enterprise was awe-inspiring in its breadth and depth in the 90's, just imagine what it'll be like with a second bite at White House apple!
BTTT
The SNL skit is right on the mark. Especially the profanity ladened outbursts towards the end.
Just WHEN did Hitliary TAPE this 'announcement'???
Notice behind her...ALL THE TREES and BUSHES ARE FULL OF LEAVES!!
Hat tip to FoxNews on Monday AM...they asked the question!
It's always springtime when Missus Clinton is present.
You cant make a silk purse out of a sows ear no matter how hard the MSM tries. There are better qualified people to lead the country than either Clinton or Obama I suspect this public quarrel between one empty pant suit and one empty suit is a smoke screen for an eventual partnership of president and vice president. Truly nightmarish no matter how you look at it.
Great work Mia T. Thanks.
Propagandists Production Inc. really put on a good double feature...Hillary and Saturday Night Live. Pre-meditated mindslaughter in the 1st degree.
One of those instances in which the literal truth in fact exceeds the imagery. ;)
BTW, it's not that the anti-clinton lefties understand she's a dud (or a 'sow,' if you will) and the rest of them do not.
Everyone knows hillary clinton is a dud... (a 'sow,' if you will)....
THE POLITICS OF DUMPING HILLARY
It precedes them: IRS audits (Where IS that unredacted Barrett Report already... and why was it REALLY redacted in the first place?), raw FBI files, trashed reputations, intimidation--both verbal and physical, and, oh yes, the deaths. It matters not one whit whether each and every item on this list is true. That it could be true is sufficient threat: Perception--reputation--IS reality. So it is not surprising that it took the better part of a year for the Left to summon the courage to dump hillary. Dumping hillary is not a reversible act, you see. Dump hillary and you're on her hit list. For life. Yours... which won't be long and happy if hillary retakes the White House and her repertoire of revenge is for real.... So dumping hillary is not your ordinary finger-in-the-air, go-with-the-flow tactical maneuver. It is a lifetime commitment. Chris Matthews, David Geffen, Mike McCurry and Leon Panetta were on the front lines making that commitment. They had the guts to dump hillary before dumping hillary was de rigueur. It is not that they understood hillary clinton is a dud and everyone else on the Left did not. Everyone knows hillary clinton is a dud. It is that they put loyalty to party above loyalty to the clintons, and had the courage to act on that loyalty.
|
by Mia T, 11.20.05
|
COPYRIGHT MIA T 2007
The scene/decorating/architecture looks more Chappaqua dutch colonial than DC georgian to me.
Check out the evergreen trees surrounding the Chappaqua house....
One thing this video does is set a precedent for not having to participate in, say, 'town hall' meetings. The bulk of her campaign will be conducted behind a camera, while pretending to take 'live questions' from her audience.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.