Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Anti-smoking milestone reached in U.S.
KPIC 4 - Oregon ^ | 1/20/07 | The Associated Press.

Posted on 01/21/2007 5:56:10 AM PST by NJRighty

RENO, Nev. (AP) - Thirty years after it began as just another quirky movement in Berkeley, Calif., the push to ban smoking in restaurants, bars and other public places has reached a national milestone.

For the first time in the nation's history, more than half of Americans live in a city or state with laws mandating that workplaces, restaurants or bars be smoke-free, according to Americans for Nonsmokers' Rights.

''The movement for smoke-free air has gone from being a California oddity to the nationwide norm,'' said Bronson Frick, the group's associate director. ''We think 100 percent of Americans will live in smoke-free jurisdictions within a few years.''

Seven states and 116 communities enacted tough smoke-free laws last year, bringing the total number to 22 states and 577 municipalities, according to the group. Nevada's ban, which went into effect Dec. 8, increased the total U.S. population covered by any type of smokefree law to 50.2 percent.

It was the most successful year for anti-smoking advocates in the U.S., said Frick, and advocates are now working with local and state officials from across the nation on how to bring the other half of the country around.

In a sign of the changing climate, new U.S. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi banned smoking in the ornate Speaker's Lobby just off the House floor this month, and the District of Columbia recently barred it in public areas. Arizona, Colorado, Hawaii, Louisiana and New Jersey also passed sweeping anti-smoking measures last year.

(Excerpt) Read more at kpic.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: antismoking; healthcare; smokingban
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 221-231 next last
To: philman_36

No, it isn't. You're appealing to an authority over two hundred years in the past and stating it as evidence that your opinion is correct.


101 posted on 01/21/2007 5:32:14 PM PST by flintsilver7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin

I agree with that statement.


102 posted on 01/21/2007 5:33:10 PM PST by flintsilver7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz
However, I do not rent to smokers.
But...but...isn't that discrimination? /irony
103 posted on 01/21/2007 5:36:44 PM PST by philman_36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: philman_36

No.

Smoking in my houses increases the fire risks and damages the walls that I will have to paint when a smoker moves out.


Until, smokers become a 'protected' class under the ADA I can choose not to rent to smokers.


104 posted on 01/21/2007 5:40:39 PM PST by trumandogz (Rudy G 2008: The "G" Stands For Gun Grabbing & Gay Lovin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: flintsilver7
The fact is that smokers are a minority and the majority wants not to be bothered by it.

"That the desires of the majority of the people are often for injustice and inhumanity against the minority, is demonstrated by every page of the history of the whole world" John Adams

Precisely what is that supposed to prove?
I'm assuming that yours is a rhetorical question.
No, it isn't.
Very well then, it isn't meant to "prove" anything.
You're appealing to an authority over two hundred years in the past and stating it as evidence that your opinion is correct.
I'm not "appealing" to some dead white guy. I'm giving you the thoughts of a learned man on the faults of majority/minority concepts to contemplate upon.

105 posted on 01/21/2007 5:43:00 PM PST by philman_36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: philman_36

You're absolutely correct that there are faults of the majority/minority concept. The statement "democracy is two foxes and a hen deciding on what to have for lunch" is a prime example of this. My point is that it isn't true in all cases.


106 posted on 01/21/2007 5:45:34 PM PST by flintsilver7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz

Do your rental contracts, if you have them, specifically prohibit smoking?


107 posted on 01/21/2007 5:46:26 PM PST by philman_36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: philman_36

Yes they do.


108 posted on 01/21/2007 5:47:34 PM PST by trumandogz (Rudy G 2008: The "G" Stands For Gun Grabbing & Gay Lovin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: flintsilver7
My point is that it isn't true in all cases.
Yours is a very telling statement.
109 posted on 01/21/2007 5:49:25 PM PST by philman_36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz
So you see no conflict in that you're allowed certain liberties, refusing to rent to smokers, on your personal property while others are restricted in the use of their personal property by the hand of government?
Afterthought...How do you know that your renters aren't smoking when you're not present? Do you sniff test? (LOL)
110 posted on 01/21/2007 5:54:35 PM PST by philman_36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz
There are few if any property rights left in this nation.

How true.

So let's just shrug and give up.

After all, that's the spirit that made this country great.

111 posted on 01/21/2007 5:57:58 PM PST by Madame Dufarge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: philman_36
I am opposed to smoking bans. However, I understand that the government has the duty to protect citizens against threats both real or perceived.

When a tenant moves out, I will determine if the painted walls have damages by smoke. If no, I do not return the deposit and use the money to paint the walls.
112 posted on 01/21/2007 5:59:00 PM PST by trumandogz (Rudy G 2008: The "G" Stands For Gun Grabbing & Gay Lovin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin

Ain't it the truth....;-)


113 posted on 01/21/2007 5:59:46 PM PST by Madame Dufarge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin; flintsilver7
I'm crushed.

I so wanted to continue to "engage"...

114 posted on 01/21/2007 6:01:31 PM PST by Madame Dufarge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: flintsilver7
Yes, I already acknowledged that you joined forces with the flighty "Madame" in insulting me.

Only the cowardly, such as yourself, refer to another poster without pinging her.

No surprises here, though.

115 posted on 01/21/2007 6:07:36 PM PST by Madame Dufarge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: Ditter
your smoking in public places

Please define public places.

116 posted on 01/21/2007 6:09:43 PM PST by elkfersupper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: elkfersupper

Places of public accommodation and places owned by the state.


117 posted on 01/21/2007 6:11:58 PM PST by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz
All that you mention are fairly recent developments and are intrusions on your fellow citizens' rights.

Glad to see you are happy about that.

118 posted on 01/21/2007 6:16:57 PM PST by elkfersupper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: flintsilver7
Maybe you're ignorant and you really don't understand the concept, or maybe I'm wrong and you're in the extremely narrow minority of property owners that are exempt from the Fair Housing Act.

It's nice to know we have lots of new government-worshipers on Free Republic.

119 posted on 01/21/2007 6:24:22 PM PST by elkfersupper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: flintsilver7
secondhand smoke is harmful.

Not nearly as harmful as first-or second-hand tyranny.

120 posted on 01/21/2007 6:26:49 PM PST by elkfersupper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 221-231 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson