Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

SHAME ON BOY'S FOLKS AND OPRAH (Kidnapped boy Shawn Hornbeck on Oprah Winfrey Show)
nypost.com ^ | January 19, 2007 | LINDA STASI

Posted on 01/19/2007 9:24:31 AM PST by Free ThinkerNY

SHAME ON BOY'S FOLKS AND OPRAH

By LINDA STASI

January 19, 2007

YESTERDAY, the parents of Shawn Hornbeck did what any parent whose child had been held captive and suf fered hell on earth would do in this circumstance: They put him on TV to suffer further pain, shame and humiliation. On "Oprah" yet.

Yes, Pam and Craig Akers, Shawn's parents, who say they have not (yes, that's "not") asked him about his ordeal because it would be too painful right now, nonetheless had no problem dragging their traumatized child out before God and everyone to answer questions on national TV.

Well, let me rephrase that. They might have turned down a first interview with God if He'd asked, but who can say, "No," to Oprah?

This, mind you, occurred yesterday - less than a week after the boy's dramatic rescue.

At least Elizabeth Smart's smarmy parents waited a month and a half to drag her out to play the harp on "The John Walsh Show" like a little abused, emotionless Muppet.

Shawn, however, looked like he just wanted to die - maybe of shame, maybe of terror, or maybe just because after being held captive by a monster, a child knows when he's being exploited. And yesterday, he was - in the most legal, sanitized, huggy-feely, disgraceful way.

Hey, kid, get used to it - this is your 15 minutes and you better milk it for all it's worth. And if your folks are anything like the Smarmy Smarts, you, too, will be a TV movie before long. Now that's entertainment.

And while no one asked Shawn if he'd been sexually abused by The Monster, Oprah did, in fact, ask his parents, saying, "OK, I'm going to go there and ask you, what do you think happened?

(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial
KEYWORDS: shawnhornbeck
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 next last
To: timsbella

Gee , I Wonder what your thoughts are about the kidnapper Devlin who had kiddie porn on the computer ?

I'm sure you NEVER lost a leg searching for a missing child like Shawn's Dad DID !


61 posted on 01/19/2007 10:51:45 AM PST by DvdMom (Impeach Nifong -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: DvdMom
I am only about 100% sure the sicko did all the things you posted. And putting Shawn in front of Oprah and another camera for people to gawk at...is even more sick, if you ask me. The psychology of it all is almost too much to think about....

I remain to send all the love I can to both of the boys....

62 posted on 01/19/2007 10:53:54 AM PST by BossLady ("People will do anything, no matter how absurd, in order to avoid facing their own soul" - Carl Jung)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: DvdMom

Devlin deserves something of biblical proportion. (And I'm an old testament girl).

As I said, if the parents want to appear to discuss the situation, that's their choice. Bringing the child on stage under media scrutinty, that's just wrong. BTW - I do sympathize with their financial situation as I said in a much, much earlier post on this thread.


63 posted on 01/19/2007 10:55:36 AM PST by timsbella (Mark Steyn for Prime Minister of Canada! (Steve's won my vote in the meantime))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: twigs
Normally I would agree with you. I am always getting on to people who say "I wouldn't do that if I was them" because I don't think we always understand how others are feeling. Usually my objections are direct to those who criticize the behavior of people who's child has died. I lost a child and I understand better than someone who hasn't the emotions that you go through.

In this case the boy is obviously humiliated at watching his parents on Oprah while he is on TV. If the parents went on Oprah alone to give support to other parents who are missing children I would not object. But to drag the boy out in front of the camera, while they speculate about his homosexual rape, is cruel and inhuman.
64 posted on 01/19/2007 10:56:50 AM PST by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Ditter

Well said, thank you.


65 posted on 01/19/2007 10:57:33 AM PST by timsbella (Mark Steyn for Prime Minister of Canada! (Steve's won my vote in the meantime))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: timsbella
I won't speculate as to why or should. I wouldn't, but then, I didn't have to make the decision under the circumstances either.

I won't make any comments regarding the kids involved other than to say, the look in Shawn's eyes was identical to the look in Elizabeth Smart's eyes from where I was sitting looking at the t.v. I think that's all we need or have the right to know about the circumstances. Ben's eyes were not as similar to Shawn's or Elizabeth's, but I could see just the slightest resemblance. The only thing I want and demand to know is that the people who did this to these kids are given a fair trial and, if found guilty, are behind bars for a very, very long time or in a maximum security facility for the criminally insane for the rest of their lives. That's all "I" have a right or the need to know.
66 posted on 01/19/2007 10:58:25 AM PST by Constitutions Grandchild
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Constitutions Grandchild

You're assuming the man's insane. I suspect he is evil.


67 posted on 01/19/2007 11:00:33 AM PST by timsbella (Mark Steyn for Prime Minister of Canada! (Steve's won my vote in the meantime))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Ditter

Exactly.


68 posted on 01/19/2007 11:00:44 AM PST by L98Fiero (A fool who'll waste his life, God rest his guts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: timsbella

I might also add, that is the point where all the media (including Bill O'Reilly and his big mouth) should leave it -- crime, trial, punishment -- leave the kids out of it and cover the "what to do in the future to protect our kids" angle from a different perspective than knowing every intimate detail of the Elizabeth, Shawn and Ben's ordeal.


69 posted on 01/19/2007 11:05:46 AM PST by Constitutions Grandchild
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Ditter

I am VERY sorry for the loss of your child. It's one thing in life I never want to experience.

I personally don't understand what the parents are doing either, but I wouldn't say that publicly. However, I don't know all the circumstances and these parents have done nothing else that would lead me to make the accusations I've been reading on FR about them. They've been going public for years to get him back and I think this is probably a way to give encouragement to other parents who were experiencing what they were up to a week ago. I think a lot of people make decisions that in retrospect they would do differently and this could be one of them. I don't know. But I don't question their motives. I was haunted by the message Shawn left on their website about how long they were going to look for their son. This needs to be a time of healing and this young man must be hearing and reading all this criticism of his parents. I don't think it's good for them or more importantly, him.


70 posted on 01/19/2007 11:07:52 AM PST by twigs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: timsbella

Allow me to disabuse you of your misreading of my remark. "behind bars" is an allusion to P-R-I-S-0-N. Either, or, or both if required.

As to the condition of his soul, not my call, and I humbly suggest it's not yours either -- his acts may be evil -- but I won't make the call on his soul.


71 posted on 01/19/2007 11:09:13 AM PST by Constitutions Grandchild
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Constitutions Grandchild

Spot on! The children have suffered enough. I don't watch any of it for interest, information or entertainment. I can't imagine why people do. I makes me heartsick. I was thrilled the children were returned home and pray for them. My only interest is seeing their captors brought to justice.


72 posted on 01/19/2007 11:09:31 AM PST by timsbella (Mark Steyn for Prime Minister of Canada! (Steve's won my vote in the meantime))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Constitutions Grandchild

My evil remark was a comment on his sanity. There is a dangerous assumption than sane people don't kill. I do not share this opinion. Sane, evil people perpetrate much evil.


73 posted on 01/19/2007 11:13:37 AM PST by timsbella (Mark Steyn for Prime Minister of Canada! (Steve's won my vote in the meantime))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY; mhking

Shamefull.

Just damn material.


74 posted on 01/19/2007 11:15:03 AM PST by roaddog727 (BullS##t does not get bridges built)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

Oprah would take a bath in the kids blood if it would make her another dime. Anyone that watches that woman on TV is ten bricks short of a load. Next I'll tell you what I really think.


75 posted on 01/19/2007 11:16:02 AM PST by org.whodat (Never let the facts get in the way of a good assumption.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: timsbella

I agree. St. Paul was a SOB, wasn't he? I'm glad I didn't have to make the call before he was knocked off his ass. I won't make the call -- above my paygrade. I will say all sin is evil, even mine -- unforgiveness. I struggle with it daily, and if I don't win the battle, I'll be joining Devlin if he can't turn the ship around.


76 posted on 01/19/2007 11:17:14 AM PST by Constitutions Grandchild
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Eva
"He had all his teeth and was neatly groomed at the time, too."

My mom, judgemental as ever over appearances, commented on how 'tacky' Shawn's family looked. I said "Four years of a living hell will do things to a person."

Even she had to agree.

77 posted on 01/19/2007 11:19:00 AM PST by sweet_diane ("They hate us 'cause they ain't us.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

Poor kid.


78 posted on 01/19/2007 11:20:14 AM PST by RobbyS ( CHIRHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: twigs

The kid was not lucky in the parents he got.


79 posted on 01/19/2007 11:24:10 AM PST by RobbyS ( CHIRHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo
....but who can say, "No," to Oprah?

I'm one who did. She gave me her private phone number to call if I changed my mind. The subject of her fat checks never even came up, though I'm sure they were.
Sometimes you have to relive horrors, but when you have a choice, there are better ways to spend your time.

80 posted on 01/19/2007 11:24:33 AM PST by Graymatter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson