Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Nifong a Topic at State Bar Council (and Feds Decline to Act for Now)
Eyewitness News 11 ^ | 1/16/07

Posted on 01/16/2007 10:03:31 AM PST by freespirited

This week Durham District Attorney Mike Nifong could be slapped with more charges related to his handling of the Duke Lacrosse case.

This week the State Bar Council will be holding its quarterly meetings in Raleigh. During this time, the agency could add ethics charges against the Durham district attorney.

Nifong recused himself from the Duke Lacrosse case shortly after the state bar filed an ethics complaint against him last month. He's accused of misconduct for statements he made to the media last spring.

In a letter obtained by Eyewitness News, defense attorney, Joe Cheshire requested to meet with Nifong in March about the statements.

"I do not understand why you will reportedly speak to the media in such certain, condemning terms before all the evidence is in, but you will not have the courtesy to meet or even speak with a representative of someone you have publicly condemned," Cheshire stated in the letter.

Nifong could also face additional charges for withholding DNA evidence that was favorable to the accused players. Evidence that is now in the hands of the state's Attorney General.

"We accept these cases with our eyes wide open to the evidence, but with blinders on for all other distractions," Roy Cooper said.

The State Bar Council meets today.

The council will decide this spring if his public comments about the case were a violation of the professional rules of conduct. Nifong's ethics meeting is scheduled for May.

No Federal Probe

The U.S. Attorney General's office has responded to Congressman Walter Jones' request for a federal probe of the Duke Lacrosse Case.

In a letter delivered Thursday, Alberto Gonzales' office wrote that it would be, "Premature to initiate a federal investigation pending a criminal trial."

This means the Attorney General will not be getting involved in the case at this time.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: dnaevidence; dukelax; nifong
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 541-546 next last
To: freespirited

Based on the 60 minutes interview, Durham District Attorney Mike Nifong is going to be slapped monetarily. Duke University Trustees should be worried about the endowmwnt. Probably the president and the 88 signatories should be taking steps to hide assets as well.


61 posted on 01/16/2007 12:43:46 PM PST by Jimmy Valentine's brother (For DemocRATs, being an American is all about rights, not duties.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freespirited

I question the timing. The feds stand down one day before Nifong recuses? Hmmmm..........


62 posted on 01/16/2007 1:01:56 PM PST by Jezebelle (Our tax dollars are paying the ACLU to sue the Christ out of us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CondorFlight
Regardless of past practice (and abuses) in North Carolina, the trial date has been set to be within a year of the charges being brought which is "reasonable" time line according to practices in other states. Regardless of how much it sucks in this particular case, it is not a violation of the 4th amendment guarantee of a speedy trial.
63 posted on 01/16/2007 1:02:54 PM PST by Ditto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: TommyDale
The very fact that the state refused to do anything about the corruption within Durham County, when they were aware of all those violations should have been enough for the Federal Justice Department to step in.

Is there a violation of Federal law involved or do you expect big daddy Fed to right every wrong, even if it's not on their turf? Maybe we could create a new Federal agency to investigate every fixed traffic ticket.

I'm not a states rights fanatic but having the Feds jump in this case now seems way premature and would be wrong. North Carolina has problems they need to fix on their own.

64 posted on 01/16/2007 1:17:57 PM PST by Ditto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Ditto

There have been more than enough violations of Federal, state and local laws to convict every politician in the state. Finding anyone with backbone to enforce the law is another story. That'w what NC gets when it elects the DemocRATS.


65 posted on 01/16/2007 1:22:40 PM PST by TommyDale (If we don't put a stop to this global warming, we will all be dead in 10,000 years!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory; F.J. Mitchell; Ditto; CondorFlight; Howlin; TommyDale
Dear Ditto: As I pointed out, if this were a case where some cops beat a minority, it would not matter if there was a conviction or if the matter was pre-trial. They have absolutely opened investigations into these types of incidences in the past regardless of the status of the case. (Please, don't lamely ask if the players were beaten by the cops, they weren't and we all KNOW THAT!!!) But, read below, and then give me an unequivocal opinion - yes or no - as to whether or not the civil rights of the Duke players have been violated under the color of law. Don't weasel around either. Yes or No, and defend your reasoning.

FBI Linky Linky

"That’s why it’s a federal crime for anyone acting under “color of law” willfully to deprive or conspire to deprive a person of a right protected by the Constitution or U.S. law. “Color of law” simply means that the person is using authority given to him or her by a local, state, or federal government agency.

The FBI is the lead federal agency for investigating color of law abuses, which include acts carried out by government officials operating both within and beyond the limits of their lawful authority. Off-duty conduct may be covered if the perpetrator asserted his or her official status in some way.

During Fiscal Year 2005, the FBI investigated more than 1,100 color of law cases. Most of these crimes fall into five broad areas:
• excessive force;
• sexual assaults;
false arrest and fabrication of evidence;
deprivation of property; and
• failure to keep from harm."

66 posted on 01/16/2007 1:23:19 PM PST by Enterprise (Drop pork bombs on the Islamofascist wankers. Praise the Lord and pass the hammunition.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Dante3

Oh, you mean UNlike all those cases where prosecutors were charged with misconduct by federal authorities? Now what were those again?


67 posted on 01/16/2007 1:25:43 PM PST by justshutupandtakeit (If you believe ANYTHING in the Treason Media you are a fool.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Jimmy Valentine's brother
Probably the president and the 88 signatories should be taking steps to hide assets as well.

So what can they do at this point? Move their assets to some exotic place offshore?

68 posted on 01/16/2007 1:28:05 PM PST by freespirited (Honk for disbarment of Mike Nifong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: BnBlFlag

Surely a local would be smart enough to keep a scalawag or carpet bagger from this office. Those were Republicans anyway.


69 posted on 01/16/2007 1:28:06 PM PST by justshutupandtakeit (If you believe ANYTHING in the Treason Media you are a fool.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Enterprise

Ditto is so into defending the treatment of the Duke players, I have to wonder if he/she is actively involved in the case on the side of the prosecution.


70 posted on 01/16/2007 1:29:58 PM PST by TommyDale (If we don't put a stop to this global warming, we will all be dead in 10,000 years!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Ditto

You are hearing the voices of those who FEEL something should be done by the feds. Laws don't matter to those FEELING this way. Precedent has no value to those FEELING this way. Federalist is just another concept of no use to those FEELING something must be done.


71 posted on 01/16/2007 1:32:43 PM PST by justshutupandtakeit (If you believe ANYTHING in the Treason Media you are a fool.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: TommyDale

It would be a bone wearying task to go over the whole case with Ditto at this time and try to point out that Nifong should be investigated for wrongful acts committed within and beyond his authority.


72 posted on 01/16/2007 1:34:41 PM PST by Enterprise (Drop pork bombs on the Islamofascist wankers. Praise the Lord and pass the hammunition.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: CondorFlight

Such issues are generally handled through STATE laws before the feds get involved.

Much of your post is just ranting with no connection to anything relevent to this case.


73 posted on 01/16/2007 1:35:18 PM PST by justshutupandtakeit (If you believe ANYTHING in the Treason Media you are a fool.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: justshutupandtakeit

See post Number 66 regarding my "Feelings."


74 posted on 01/16/2007 1:35:49 PM PST by Enterprise (Drop pork bombs on the Islamofascist wankers. Praise the Lord and pass the hammunition.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: maggief

Sounds like a diet to me. Classically, a female call to arms. "Let's seize this opportunity to motivate us to take off a few pounds"... (From article: "To fight the way we know how" (huge grin).


75 posted on 01/16/2007 1:38:59 PM PST by Alia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: CondorFlight

So there is a federal law against having Too Many Strange People and Things Happening in Durham? What does ANY of that farrago have to do with the Duke boys?


76 posted on 01/16/2007 1:39:27 PM PST by justshutupandtakeit (If you believe ANYTHING in the Treason Media you are a fool.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Tallguy

Do you think it is "possible" that state law takes precedence in this matter? I do.. It's got to grind through the state.


77 posted on 01/16/2007 1:41:21 PM PST by Alia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Dante3

Before throwing shots at Federal Gonzalez, why not point your little target in NC D-Easley's direction.


78 posted on 01/16/2007 1:42:32 PM PST by Alia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: justshutupandtakeit
Yeah right. Everyone will just sit back and wait until the State is through with their cases. You can stop posting nonsense now, thank you.

The FBI has been asked to investigate the beating of a jail inmate, allegedly at the hands of guards.

Lake County Sheriff Roy Dominguez said six officers, who were not identified, have been suspended with pay.

Inmate Tommy Ford (pictured) was hospitalized following the Dec. 26 attack at the county jail in Crown Point. The sheriff declined to describe the extent of Ford's injuries.

link

79 posted on 01/16/2007 1:42:33 PM PST by Enterprise (Drop pork bombs on the Islamofascist wankers. Praise the Lord and pass the hammunition.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Sprite518

For starters, how about learning about laws concerning feds and state? In some cases, the Feds can intervene; in other laws, the States have more power.


80 posted on 01/16/2007 1:43:37 PM PST by Alia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 541-546 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson