Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: quidnunc
When you buy songs at the iTunes Music Store, you can play them on one — and only one — line of portable player, the iPod. And when you buy an iPod, you can play copy-protected songs bought from one — and only one — online music store, the iTunes Music Store.

Well that sucks.

6 posted on 01/14/2007 11:29:47 AM PST by CAWats (I don't care about apathy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: CAWats
When you buy songs at the iTunes Music Store, you can play them on one — and only one — line of portable player, the iPod.

Not true. I use an iAudio, a little mp3 out of Korea, I think. I can get FM and record as well. I use iTunes and can burn the music to a CD and can then upload them to my device. Is it a 1 shot deal, no, but I'm not spending hundreds of dollars to do what I'm doing now - playing music on the mp3 player of my choice.

12 posted on 01/14/2007 11:53:23 AM PST by radiohead (They call me DOCTOR radiohead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: CAWats; quidnunc; radiohead
>> ... when you buy an iPod, you can play copy-protected songs bought from one — and only one — online music store, the iTunes Music Store.

> Well that sucks.

Only if you insist on supporting DRM-laden songs. There are good download outlets that don't have DRM.

On the one hand, I have a pretty good CD collection, and a lot of old LPs, and they all convert to MP3 format, which my iPod plays perfectly well.

On the other hand, my iPod also plays all the songs I download from eMusic.com

My feeling is that the best deal is to buy a CD if you want the "hard-copy", and rip MP3s from that; or support the LEGAL non-DRM download sites like eMusic.com, if all you want is the digital track.

I refuse to buy DRM-laden songs, and if enough people did the same, DRM would lose enough market share that the market would take care of disposing of it, just like most other bad ideas that can't compete on their own merits.

32 posted on 01/14/2007 12:24:33 PM PST by dayglored (Listen, strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: CAWats
Well that sucks.

It's the same as the Zune. Microsoft, various player manufacturers and various music stores tried the multi-device, multi-store approach, but it wasn't very successful. People may complain about lock-in, but it seems that's what the market wants.

39 posted on 01/14/2007 12:34:54 PM PST by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: CAWats
When you buy songs at the iTunes Music Store, you can play them on one — and only one — line of portable player, the iPod. And when you buy an iPod, you can play copy-protected songs bought from one — and only one — online music store, the iTunes Music Store.

Just like the Macintosh computer.

122 posted on 01/14/2007 2:53:46 PM PST by Mr. Brightside
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: CAWats

I giggle at apple fans. Surely they realize that Apple would be just as mean and unfair as Microsoft if they were in the same dominant position.

In fact, in the small segment that they DO rule the market, they behave exactly the same.

Not that there's anything wrong with that. :p


140 posted on 01/14/2007 5:29:45 PM PST by Constantine XIII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson