Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BUSH CANDOR: DECISIONS HAVE MADE IRAQ MORE UNSTABLE
Drudge Report ^ | January 13, 2007 | Matt Drudge

Posted on 01/13/2007 11:15:33 AM PST by West Coast Conservative

The president concedes that his decisions have led to more instability in Iraq. President Bush made the admission in an exclusive interview with Scott Pelley at Camp David yesterday (12), his first interview since addressing the nation about Iraq. It will be broadcast on 60 MINUTES Sunday, Jan. 14 (8:00-9:00 PM, ET/PT) on the CBS Television Network.

The president says the current sectarian violence in Iraq, is a destabilizing factor that "could lead to attacks here in America" and must be controlled. He defended his decision to invade Iraq in the same way, saying Saddam was competing with Iran to get a nuclear weapon and making the region unstable. But when pressed by Pelley, Bush concedes that conditions in Iraq are much worse now.

Pelley: But wasn't it your administration that created the instability in Iraq? Bush: "Our administration took care of a source of instability in Iraq. Envision a world in which Saddam Hussein was rushing for a nuclear weapon to compete against Iran... He was a significant source of instability. Pelley: It's much more unstable now, Mr. President. Bush: Well, no question, decisions have made things unstable.

"I think history is going to look back and see a lot of ways we could have done things better. No question about it," says Bush.

Toppling Saddam was not a mistake, however. "My decision to remove Saddam Hussein was the correct decision in my judgment. We didn't find the weapons we thought we would find or the weapons everybody thought he had. But he was a significant source of instability," Bush tells Pelley. "We liberated that country from a tyrant. I think the Iraqi people owe the American people a huge debt of gratitude and I believe most Iraqi's express that."

The execution of Saddam was mishandled, says the president, who saw only parts of it on the Internet because he didn't want to watch the dictator fall through the trap door. "I thought it was discouraging... It's important that that chapter of Iraqi history be closed. [But] They could have handled it a lot better."


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: bush; iraq; saddam
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 321-323 next last
To: The_Eaglet

More specifically, quote what I said and ask a question about it.


221 posted on 01/13/2007 1:13:21 PM PST by The_Eaglet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 218 | View Replies]

To: Peach

Peach, or anyone:

Is that video of the trucks leaving for Baathist Syria still around? Any of the articles on it?


222 posted on 01/13/2007 1:14:22 PM PST by combat_boots (The MSM: State run Democrat media masquerading as corporations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: defenderSD

Based on my read of it, it sounded like the President was trying to make the point that the present instability was due to the overal "state" of transition.


223 posted on 01/13/2007 1:15:26 PM PST by The_Eaglet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 219 | View Replies]

To: combat_boots

I sure don't have that video or the links to it; I had a computer crash and lost a lot of that stuff. Keep asking on pertinent thread (anything about Iraq) and maybe someone will have it.


224 posted on 01/13/2007 1:15:26 PM PST by Peach (The Clintons pardoned more terrorists than they captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 222 | View Replies]

To: The_Eaglet
"Freeper Peach - I do wish the president hadn't said this. He has NOTHING to apologize for."

You responded to her on Post #5 - "How about 3000 dead Americans and deficit spending?"

Once again, why should President Bush apologize for the 3000 troops that have died in Iraq fighting terrorists and insurgents? Why? You posted it, I am calling you on it.
225 posted on 01/13/2007 1:16:24 PM PST by jrooney ( Hold your cards close.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 218 | View Replies]

To: defenderSD
Another idea to keep in mind is that some of the best evidence for Saddam's WMD programs probably came from informants

Would any of these 'informants' be disenfranchised former Iraqis with an ax to grind against Hussein? Like Chalabi? Only cost us around $400,000 to get his 'information' didn't it? Guess that was some of my tax dollars going for a good cause (even though I can't seem to find the power to spend tax dollars like that in the Constitution)

We can't disclose publicly evidence from informants, because of course that would put their lives in danger and make it very difficult to recruit informants in other countries in the future. We also cannot disclose most of the information gathered by the NSA, because that would allow Saddam's regime to deduce some of the capabilities of the NSA, i.e., what kind of communications we are able to intercept

But yet they were able to disclose a rather specific list of information received from the 'informants' (types of supposed weapons, locations of supposed weapons, etc) to get buy in for the police action. Hmmm......

Oh I see!! It's okay to release information to get the buy in for the military action but when the military action doesn't find the information as it was told to us, it's not okay to release information. Makes so much sense now....

226 posted on 01/13/2007 1:16:25 PM PST by billbears (Those who do not remember the past are condemned to repeat it. --Santayana)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 212 | View Replies]

To: word_warrior_bob
"Bush has been reading the New York Times too much."

ROFL!! post of the day...
227 posted on 01/13/2007 1:16:54 PM PST by Liberty Valance (Keep a simple manner for a happy life)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: billbears

No I don't read WND and those are my own conclusions based on many sources and a lot of logical thinking about this subject. When you say things like "no sale" about trucks going to Syria, I don't know what you're talking about. The liberal media of course did not publicize that information, but conservatives at FR certainly accept that explanation for some materials leaving Iraq. Please keep in mind that the liberal news media is not the final judge of what is true or false in such a complex situation. The agenda of the news media is to attack the GOP and advance the power of the DemocRAT party.


228 posted on 01/13/2007 1:17:09 PM PST by defenderSD (Listens to Dvorak on headphones but tells the kids it's U2.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 217 | View Replies]

To: defenderSD

Good points; as I said, I think relatively good arguments can be made with regard to letting the left continue to spew about WMD. There aren't similar excuses for letting the left get away with lying about other key aspects of the war, however.


229 posted on 01/13/2007 1:17:53 PM PST by Peach (The Clintons pardoned more terrorists than they captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 212 | View Replies]

To: jrooney
That was question, not a statement.

He has responsibility for sending Americans to their death and implementing deficit spending.

230 posted on 01/13/2007 1:18:13 PM PST by The_Eaglet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 225 | View Replies]

To: defenderSD

Lt. General Delong also has commented on the trucks going to Syria and he was the Deputy Centcom commander I believe.


231 posted on 01/13/2007 1:19:32 PM PST by jrooney ( Hold your cards close.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 228 | View Replies]

To: billbears

Incorrect. We did not disclose the most convincing, most senstive intelligence before the war. We used less powerful, more publicly available information to persuade the public to back the war, in order to protect sources and methods.


232 posted on 01/13/2007 1:19:43 PM PST by defenderSD (Listens to Dvorak on headphones but tells the kids it's U2.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 226 | View Replies]

To: AliVeritas

That's a great blog; was there something in particular you wanted me to look at? I read a few of the mini articles about Iraq and the deficit.


233 posted on 01/13/2007 1:20:18 PM PST by Peach (The Clintons pardoned more terrorists than they captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 210 | View Replies]

To: Triggerhippie

That was more a military action than a war. We didn't occupy a country or depose a dictator.


234 posted on 01/13/2007 1:21:18 PM PST by Peach (The Clintons pardoned more terrorists than they captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]

To: The_Eaglet

You responded to Peach when she said he had nothing to apologize for and you commented what about the 3000 troops that have died in Iraq. You said it, do not be a coward now. I am asking you why he should apologize for it. You think he should, so I am asking you why?


235 posted on 01/13/2007 1:21:49 PM PST by jrooney ( Hold your cards close.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 230 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative
Unfortunately, it appears the President has given the Democrats and the media lots of new sound bites to beat him with. I expect this week will have never ending strings of them on parade in the news and from antiwar politicians (but, I repeat myself).

He should be exposing them mercilessly for their calculated calumny, not apologizing to them for his honest failings.

But, I do admit he has a problem. He can't even get his own intelligence agencies to cooperate in massive intelligence leaks which are hurting our war efforts, nor can he get his own DOJ to prosecute them.

Bush needs to start lopping off heads all over, not wearing a hair shirt and tugging on his forelock.

236 posted on 01/13/2007 1:22:35 PM PST by Gritty (Democrats like to talk tough, but you can never trap them into fighting - Ann Coulter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dick Vomer

Ditto eveything you just said.


237 posted on 01/13/2007 1:22:44 PM PST by Peach (The Clintons pardoned more terrorists than they captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: MovementConservative
>>>... now that the gloves are off as far as coddling Sadr <<<

Read on FR (see below) that it looks like the Kurdish Peshmerga is mobilizing to join in the fight in Baghdad. I hope the Peshmerga put a knife in Sadr's bellybutton.

FR Title: "Iraq - Kurd general says his brigade training intensively for urban combat in Baghdad""

238 posted on 01/13/2007 1:22:55 PM PST by HardStarboard (Give Pelosi and Reid Enough Rope to Hang Themselves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: jrooney

My answer is at #230.


239 posted on 01/13/2007 1:27:03 PM PST by The_Eaglet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 235 | View Replies]

To: The_Eaglet; Polybius

I thought that Polybius's response to you in #142 was an excellent response and that you've been unable (or unwilling) to answer.

Still dodging a few questions posed to you by freepers.

And your continued whining about the deficit as it relates to the war makes me all the more convinced I was right about you originally.

You seem unwilling to acknowledge that Wall Street analysts, people who actually know what they're talking about as opposed to some freeper I've never heard of before, are nearly universally unconcerned about the deficit, especially as it related to the GDP.

But keep whining. You're proving my point with each post.


240 posted on 01/13/2007 1:27:41 PM PST by Peach (The Clintons pardoned more terrorists than they captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 321-323 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson