Posted on 01/10/2007 2:30:20 PM PST by STARWISE
Unswayed by anti-war passions, President Bush will send 21,500 additional U.S. troops to Iraq and build the American presence there toward its highest level to quell worsening bloodshed. The move puts Bush on a collision course with the new Democratic Congress and runs counter to advice from some senior generals.
Set to announce his decisions in a prime-time speech Wednesday night, Bush was to acknowledge making major mistakes in Iraq, primarily failing to deploy enough U.S. soldiers and demand more Iraqi troops and cooperation to confront the country's near-anarchy.
In advance of Bush's address, White House counselor Dan Bartlett said U.S. military operations have been "handcuffed by political interference by Iraqi leadership" but now will proceed under rules allowing troops to confront Shiite militias as well as Sunni insurgents.
(snip)
The new Democratic leaders of Congress met with Bush and complained afterward that their opposition to a buildup had been ignored. "This is the third time we are going down this path. Two times this has not worked," said House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif. "Why are they doing this now? That question remains."
Senate and House Democrats are arranging votes urging the president not to send more troops. While lacking the force of law, the measures would compel Republicans to go on record as either bucking the president or supporting an escalation.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Carried live online by: C-span
(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...
People like marajade don't want to know the truth. When truth doesn't fit their agenda, they ignore it. I know what you mean, txradioguy. Our son served in Iraq and he would be the first to tell "marajade" that's he/she/it is full of crapola.
Prayers up for your wonderful grandson, his nation thanks him.
I heard today that "escalation" is another hot button word from the Vietnam War Era...and that is why the dems are using that word instead of "surge"...
Because supposedly Nixon or Ford used the word escalation when they infused a lot of troops to try to win the war...before the dem Congress pulled the rug right out from under them.
Therefore the ESCALATION word is very on purpose.
Wow. 100%? Impressive.
Thanks for that, I never mention it but I was surprised that he's not going sooner.
Thank yous' on the way. He's a real Marine, always loved guns and he can kick a$$. However he ate like a horse when he was back and really porked up.
He'll do fine over there. Of course my prayers are always up and he'll come home a hero.
That is why us GUYS always need control of the Remote Control....keeps the crap out of the House!
I just LITERALLY shuddered, thinking of Harry Reid and the cold fish handshake ACK ACK ACK
The draw down will be complete by November, so figure the Iran issue will be settled by then.
One way or another, the Iranian issue will be addressed this year.
Did't Shebag use that word too?
If it was about the war, how did this great American Patriot/Dim get reelected?????:
Thanks for the obit. I put it in Bookmarks so I could read completely later. God Bless her and you!
Hey, if people want to call this an occupation, I'm all for occupation. We succeeded in Germany and Japan, and failed disastrously in Vietnam and Somalia.
He reminds me of the guy from Poltergeist
Why don't you just STFU
You make every thread about you. Do you need a blue pill or is it PMS, get help.
Thanks. Great homepage you have, by the way.
v/r
TADSLOS
LOL. True, except for that last part: procreate - they have a hard time with that one because they can't even define it for the most part, let alone, let it commence naturally.
I'm sorry?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.