Posted on 01/09/2007 9:09:53 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
In a way, he's right........This is the reality of a true democracy.........
Chavez is a communist, too bad we didn't take him out while we still had a chance.
The only upside that I see here is that given socialism and the Venezuelan incompetence at operating anything, the production cost of Venezuelan crude oil will be well above the world price---
Nationalizing industries worked so well everywhere else, I'm sure it'll work for Chavez, too. (\sarc)
War is peace, love is hate, and ignorance is strength.
Long live Big Brother.
>> Chavez asked the National Assembly, which his allies control, to give him powers to carry out many of his proposals by executive decree.
History repeats itself. Adolf Hitler and his National Socialist (Nazi) party essentially did the same thing in the Reichstag with the Enabling Act in 1933.
Chilling.
Okay liberals, here's your chance. Pay close attention to what happens in Venezuela. It'll seem great at first because there's still some money left. But that will soon dry up and everything will get (and stay) far worse than before.
Somewhere along the lines the media has to be controlled with an iron fist (can't let the disaster become apparent). And the real fun - the killing - begins. Anyone that disagrees, tries to leave, disobeys, etc.
"The only upside that I see here is that given socialism and the Venezuelan incompetence at operating anything, the production cost of Venezuelan crude oil will be well above the world price---"
And we are the biggest consumer of it.
coming to a town near you soon.
Venezuelan crude will still sell at the world price and the loss will be absorbed by the Venezuelans who put him in office--
The Venezuelans invited them in because they needed the investment capital, and the technology, to develop this area. The Orinoco Basin has enormous reserves, but its extra-heavy stuff, its not the good stuff everyone is used to dealing with. Chavez himself has re-assured them several times in order to get them to stay and increase their investments. Now he will pocket the fruit of their labor.
With $17 billion invested, they are hostage to their investment, and Chavez knows it.
The US government isn't going to intervene to help a private company, and Chavez knows that too.
In another era, companies in a similar situation would be talking quietly, behind the scenes, to anyone they could find who would be sympathetic to their plight, military officers, spooks, young firebrands on the make, and with that kind of money on the line, who could blame them? If some jerk was going to steal $17 billion from you, what would you be prepared to do to protect it?
Lemme see if I understand the cycle:
Capitalists produce wealth. Demogogue comes in and nationalizes the wealth. Wealth disappears. Country spirals into poverty. Demogogue overthrown. IMF comes in to bail out country. Demands privatization of public companies. Capitalists come back and produce wealth. Demogogue comes in...
Etc. Etc.
I have to disagree.
It's true that pure democracy can lead to socialism--- that's why Aristotle referred to "vulgar democracy" as "rule of the poor".
But that's not what's happening in Venezuela, where the necessary conditions for democracy have been stripped away by Chavez, who, is not a democrat, pure or otherwise. That's why for as long as he could, he fought the legality of the referendum on him before winning it through dubious means.
Contrary to those on FR who continually repeat that the United States is a republic and not a democracy, it's in point of fact both and always has been (as most of them actually know), and with the expansion of the franchise to men regardless of the status of their holdings, blacks, women, has only become more democratic--- which is a good thing, considering the harm the expansion of the power of our least democratic branch, the United States Supreme Court, has done in the last one hundred years alone.
What Chavez is doing is FAR from "true democracy".
So how much longer until Venezuela's agriculture gets ruined by bad weather? From what I read in the papers, bad weather only affects socialist countries.
If they weren't divorced from reality, they wouldn't be liberals. That is other than those who simply see liberalism as a facade used to gain power.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.