Everytime someone mentions Free Republic, they always have such nice things to say...
Medved, is a big amnesty supporter. It doesn't surprise me that this would draw his wrath.
Ping to Round 3 of Corsi vs. Medved
Our southern boarder is being torn down regardless of what he says.
If only he could help here at cuckoo land, Free Republic.
It came in on little cat's paws........and is here for good. Or more likely, for bad.
Leni
Thanks for posting. Interesting exchanges between Medved and Corsi.
Invite Jerry Corsi on your show. Let's see what you got!
Yes, and George W. Bush denies that his Temporary Guest Worker Program is really just amnesty for Mexican illegal aliens.
But, just as we know that the TGWP is amnesty, we also know that the SPP is working toward a NAU.
ping
When the facts are on Medved's side, he argues facts. When he switches to ad hominum attacks it's a sure sign he has nothing. Congress and the Bush adminstration are planning to give illegals Social Security, which will bankrupt the system even faster than it would otherwise. Yet he prefers to talk about old FR posts. Oh well, illegals won't be competing for his job.
Medved and Farah are both into non-reality land with their attacks on evolution.
bttt
ping!
(03/04/2004)
H'mmm. Isn't it interesting that Michael Medved, of rather dubious conservative pedigree himself, goes out of his way to buy into the John Kerry "resume" which has proven over and over again to be of less than convincing merit. JFKerry's catholicism may have been bally-hooed by that candidate in his shameless self-promotion...but it's practice is less-than-manifest in his life, and political positions. All real conservatives...indeed, all U.S. citizens... are entitled to a healthy skepticism and concern on Kerry. Not for his religion, but for the actual motivational core principles that would guide Mr. Kerry as a Senator...or still more alarmingly...as President of the United States. It has been surmised that he has no core beliefs and has only ambition itself as his real creed. I believe that was what Corsi was saying.
It makes no difference whether he is Catholic, Jewish, Protestant, or perhaps Suffi Muslim...or atheist. He does, however, seem to need to make up his mind. His flip-flopping tendancy was a core campaign issue, that the Bush campaign also picked up on. Somehow, though, Medved doesn't here...instead he focusses on his own fevered, fetid accusations.
... doesn’t Corsi’s snide little comment about Kerry’s “reverting” to the faith from which his paternal grandparents converted, give off unmistakable, fetid whiffs of anti-Semitic obsession?
Huh? Sounds to me that Michael Medved is hyper-sensitive on this issue.
It really doesn't sound like that at all, let alone "unmistakeable" or "fetid" or "obsession." Corsi was zeroing in on the PERSONALITY DEFECT in Kerry, not his religion. We have a candidate who has established a pattern of trying to say and be all things to all interest groups. Shamelessly seeking with falsehoods to "identify" with them...
Corsi's was an interesting question. Rather than having the questioner cavalierly dumped on for bigotry, perhaps Mr. Medved should have instead investigated the answer to the question and the ultimate issues, rather than squander his time apparently looking for ad hominem dirt on Corsi.
And the rest of Medved's ranting diatribe is worse than the fever swamp which he condemns. Medved's imbroglio rhetorical approach is simply "fetid" and his evasion of the myriads of substantive evidences of the SPP "game-plan" following in the shoes of the EU "game-plan" ...recently admitted as a covert one and published by its architects...puts the "deniars" such as Medved on the defensive.
And the question has to be asked...why now? Why is Medved suddenly desperate to weigh into this issue trying to deny it, and cause as much damage to conservatives as he can, except that certain incontrovertible embarassing facts have now come to light. I.e., the recent FOIA disclosure that Illegal Aliens would qualify for Social Security under Totalization...a fact also previously carefully DENIED and concealed by the Administration in its 2004 agreement with Mexico.
They...and their waterboy Medved have some 'splainin' to do.
Medved is one of those who believes the best defense is a good offense. Make no mistake, although superficially attacking via ad hominems, Medved is very much on the defense substantively.
Of the SNR pundits, it would appear Medved is the most-egregious water boy for this administration (right or wrong), and his role in this skull-duggery will be remembered. Bennett, Ingraham, Prager, and at times, Hewitt have shown some independence. Unlike them however, Medved's noticeably weaker record in this regard is rather embarassing.
And for him to lead this charge of anti-semitism...reminds one of Shakespeare's Macbeth and like the Lady he doth protest too much...
It suggests that the Administration is finally feeling the heat for its covert globalist agenda. And, it knows that its lease on political life is shorter still than the end of the term of office. It knows that the prextext authority for the SPP negotiations...fast track authority...lapses in July of this year...and the Congress has shown no inclination of renewing it...
Other examples of the heat being turned up by the Administration itself, are the sudden editorial action by the Wall Street Journal's full-court press trying to pimp for the FTAA, 'free trade agreement of the Americas'.
...does it really make any sense—any sense at all – to frighten the public into believing that there is a current, powerful mass movement on behalf of such plans?
If there was in fact no substance, it seems to me that transparency in the negotiations, and opening up these SPP talks to the Public would be a rather easy solution or at least a good start...
And if there is substance, then perhaps they should be frightened, at the very least, by the corruption in our "representatives" implied by that.
WWYBS? (What would Yogi Berra Say?)