Posted on 01/08/2007 8:42:14 AM PST by jmaroneps37
I can sum it up for you real quick. The (cut and run, traitor, raise taxes) Dims would not be in charge of the House and Senate.
some good points but more crabby cranky disenchanted ex-voters out there posturing as principled didn't help!! And the "independents' seem split between the superficial fools you describe and fairly intelligent loners and Libertarians. The latter even vote Republican sometimes, as you know. I guess it boils down to the power of the MSM and when oh when are some deep-pocketed Conservatives going to stoop to TV and buy a network???
I watched Breyer and Scalia. Was Souter on as well?
It makes no difference. Democrats want to be your Mommy and Republicans want to be your Daddy. In either case government gets bigger and you become less free.
If you think it makes no difference - you have your head in the sand. It makes a HUGE difference and unfortunately we will soon all see that difference when the dems really get going.
Many conservatives are making the mistake of thinking that because the GOP didn't solve all our problems in the past 12 years, that there is no difference between them and the dems.
They will soon find out just how wrong they were.
If I remember correctly Republican voters elect precinct and ward committeemen. Committeemen elect county chairmen. County chairmen elect district representatives. District representatives elect State Chairmen. State Chairmen have a say in who represents us within the National Republican Party except when the President is a Republican and he normally picks the National Republican Chairman.
As you can see, it all starts at a local precinct level. True Republican voters vote in the Primaries where the local committeeman are elected. So, vote for one who represents your ideas or run for the office yourself. The Republican Party is not some obscure object. We, the voters, are the Republican Party. Stop blaming the Party for the the choice of candidates you have. Get involved. Stop letting others make the choice for you and then complain.
Admittedly McCain, Guilliani and Romney are not my choice either. We must convince someone else to run that is a better candidate. Can we do it? I don't know but we can try.
If either McCain, Guilliani or Romney happens to be the candidate for President in 2008 then that is the choice we have as Republicans or we can vote for Hillary. I for one will not like the choices and be reluctant to vote for the Republican candidate. However, I will have no reluctance to vote against Hillary Clinton. So, who ever the Republican candidate is that runs against Hillary that candidate will get my vote. And, I will vote. I don't like McCain or Guilliani but I despise Hillary. Not a hard choice for me to vote for the Republican candidate.
Let me guess, Queen Elizabeth, Henry Kissenger and the rest of the Trilateral Commision. Right?
Excellent analysis.
Haven't notice my liberties being curtailed in the past 6 years. However, that may change in the next 2 years with the Dims in charge.
*************
Good grief. What are they teaching in schools these days?
1. Islamists are a very real menace to this fragile world, even if you don't believe that, they are.
2. The Iraq war is a part of a longer, bigger fight against the Islamists, and is in no stretch of the imagination the current front of that war. The Islamists themselves say that, and I believe them, not you.
3. Even though I have no love for the faith of Islam, for now I continue to divide between those radical Islamists who we fight and the majority of Islamic peoples who are waiting to see which of the two "strong horses" will they will follow.
You can put on your blinders wherever you live, but blinders they are.
I'm getting quite angry at the Republicans for a variety of reasons. I'm not mad at Dems. They can't help being what they are and doing what they do. They just can't be trusted with power and money. The Republicans should know better and seem not to.
No, you're right, it was David Bryer... my observation, though is correct -- Bryer just doesn't get it and Scalia is truly funny, but I wish he'd lose some weight so we have him around a lot longer.
It would serve Levin, Limbaugh, Ingraham, and all the other idiots who contributed to this debacle--which I am convinced they did solely to boost their ratings and advertising revenue--if the Democrats win the Presidency in 2008 and manage to push the Fairness Doctrine back into place, killing off talk radio.
same here.
Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid will show you soon enough. Here's some predictions:
Tax increases
Expansion of the Medicare Drug Coverage
Cutting off funds for the War.
I'm sure the Left has even more surprises in store for us.
Breyer seemed to think one line zingers took the place of intellectual discussion. He's a lightweight, dyed in the wool socialist who is only now admitting he made an error in a decision. Didn't get to hear it all, so not sure which decision he was regretting.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.