To: jmaroneps37
The only time I saw people warning of the dangers of Pelosi and company was at Free Republic.
Question to you, why did the RNC not make this a national issue? Instead the RNC did their normal "cookie cutter" and "safe" campaign ads (Pro-family, less taxes, working hard for you etc...).
How come the RNC never went on the offensive by pounding the airwaves associating "moderate" or "conservative" dems with Move-On and other extreme associations/politicians who would make up the dem leadership?
How come the RNC was taken to the woodshed by being associated with the names like Abramhoff and Foley?
The Republicans blew any chance with most of swing voters but you would rather blame a few posters that would have never made a difference anyway due to the way the RNC handled the 2006 election (Independents/swing voters killed us).
211 posted on
01/08/2007 12:47:58 PM PST by
rollo tomasi
(Working hard to pay for deadbeats and corrupt politicians.)
To: rollo tomasi
And the media had nothing to do with framing the issues. They insisted it was only republicans who were corrupt. Very little mention of the cold cash congressman, or Reid's land deals, Abrahamoff connections, etc.
223 posted on
01/08/2007 1:25:49 PM PST by
OldFriend
(THE PRESS IS AN EVIL FOR WHICH THERE IS NO REMEDY)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson