As long as they don't declare Martian Law. We'll have to hire Sir Phobos to defend us!
Posted on 01/08/2007 4:56:29 AM PST by alienken
Democrats Declare Martial Law Here's one major difference between the 1994 election and the one in 2006 and the aftermath from each. In 1994, Republicans told voters, before and after the election, precisely what they would do. Speaker Newt Gingrich did not promise fealty with Democrats nor did he promise to practice a political Golden Rule. Voters disgusted with Democrats had given Republicans a mandate, and they would ram through their "Contract with America." - Cal Thomas, “Promises, promises”, Thursday, January 4, 2007
Cal Thomas’ summation of the Republican rise to power in the House back in 1994 is an accurate one – we were honest in our intention, uncompromising in our agenda and true to our principles. We felt no need to Trojan Horse our plans from the American people or our Democrat opponents. Indeed, unlike the Ancient Greeks, we planned to storm the city head-on, armed with the strength of our ideas.
Nancy Pelosi and the Democrats however, had a different approach. As was referenced by one of our earlier posts in a quote from Pelosi herself,
Democrats pledge to conduct our work with civility and bipartisanship, and to act in partnership - not partisanship - with the president and Republicans in Congress.
But let’s leave this point for later.
Once we assumed power we made every effort to follow House procedure and allow for open debate. My critics reading this may think differently, and even use the Medicare vote as an example, so let’s go ahead and compare. With the Medicare vote being open for 3 hours, members had every opportunity to cast a vote and allow for proper representation of their constituents and their ideological interests. No one, Republican or Democrat, was denied the opportunity to debate or properly represent their constituents. If their biggest gripe is that we left the vote open for too long so we could further deliberate and negotiate, then we were doing our job. The U.S. House of Representatives is a representative body, and every caution, even if it’s ceding punctuality, must be taken to ensure that it stays that way.
Nancy Pelosi and her fellow Democrats, however, are busy betraying this fundamental truth during their ‘First 100 hours’ by using House Rules in order to disallow Republicans from entering the debate or offering any amendments on the pile of liberal bills they are attempting to railroad through. Consider this – the Democrats are passing rules on bills that have not even been introduced or gone through committee yet! In effect, Pelosi and the Democrats have declared martial law in the House and their ‘First 100 Hours’ is nothing more then a Democrat blitzkrieg during which no debate, or suggested alteration, will be allowed lest it slow down their unscrupulous assault on parliamentary procedure.
This from the same people who talked about civility, bipartisanship, a ‘Minority Bill of Rights’ and ‘open and honest debate’ being the hallmarks of their tenure in power – a true Trojan Horse if ever there was one.
Unquestionably, this is one of the worst abuses of power I have ever witnessed – greater even than 1988 when Speaker Wright tried rolling two legislative days into one. At least that wasn’t 100 hours long.
I have never been one to object to principled partisanship – in fact, I think there is no better way to govern. But I have always objected to masquerading politicians cloaking themselves in the guise of compromise and cooperation while their true intentions could not be further from the façade they project. Certainly over the course of my experience, I have come to expect nothing less from Pelosi and her cohorts, but the American people have a right to expect something more. The House of Representatives as an institution means more than the newly elected leadership’s first 100 hours, and now is the time for House Republicans to fight for it.
He ran for re-election in the primary, and when he won he quit. Then, when it became clear he had ruined the chance for any other republican to be on the ballot, he refused to come back and run for the seat (which he could have done, and then resigned after the election).
He should have quit before the primary, so that ALL the republicans in his district had a fair opportunity to vote for the person they wanted as their republican representative.
By running in the primary, and then dropping out, he ensured that no republican could be on the ballot, and that whoever the "republican" was would be picked NOT by the people of the district, but by the committees in the backrooms.
And that committee picked a loser of a candidate (not literally, she would have won easily if she had been on the ballot -- she won the special election), but a loser I say based on her actions during the 5 weeks she WAS the representative of the district.
Further, by dropping out after the primary, and then moving and resigning in June, he took away a critical republican vote from the house during the last 5 months of the year.
I like that........do you mind if i borrow it for my tagline
be my guest
That looks like Race Banyon.
Doesn't it? It's Captain Murphy from "Sealab 2021." Hilarious show.
That's rich. Obviously the voters that elected to vote and voted for Republican candidates that lost are no better than those that elected to vote for a 3rd party...both are losers, but the Republicans are the ones most bitter. I guess those Republican voters that voted for non-winning Republican candidates are morons also.
So, when does the "100 Hour" clock start. And is it a contiuous run or is it based on a typical"working" day on the Hill? Or is it just another BS empty pledge by NaPo and the dimoCRACKS? Just how is the clock going to run?
Oh yes, I remember that Tom.
What ever happened to term limits?
Bailed out on running again...did it too late so his name stayed on the ballot. He should have either stayed in the race or bailed earlier.
Tried to have his cake and eat it too...ended up burning the party in the process.
The dimocrats never had any intention of keeping any of the propaganda statements they made. They NEVER made promises. They puked up their propaganda and Amerikans sucked it down with a straw!!!
My kind of poetry. But very wishful thinking, I'm afraid.
Naaah. You get the logic. The third partiers and nonvoters aren't morons for being third partiers and nonvoters. They are third partiers and nonvoters because they are morons.
I'm just having fun. Take it easy.
Follow the link up to where I was answering.
However the old spinster, NaPo says it will run. Don't you remember those trips to grandma's? What's that they say, "WHEN I SAY IT'S TIME!!!"
Three words for W...veto veto veto.
If the above is true than could you explain to me how William Jefferson (D-La) who is (was) under a cloud for bribery ($90,000.00 in freezer) is not only still in the House, was reelected AND is in line for a committee chair?
Tom DeLay is a phony. His actions prove it.
If Tom DeLay was such an upstanding Representative, why did he fail to have the Barrett Report released to the American people?
It's not Martian Law we have to worry about. It's all the dopplegangers! Save it for Queen Dopplepopolis!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.