On the other hand, what is the different gushing about Hillary Clinton or Jame Webb. Gushing is gushing you know. Even we in flyover country understand that.
The TIMES is embarrassing itself. But, then, maybe it's reached a point where it's beyond embarrassment.
Of course John Bolton was not fit because of those same characteristics.
Cut-and-run geldings...
The New York Times endorsed the reelection of Republican Governor Jodi Rell in Connecticut.
--yep--he is best described as the representative of the present version of the Capone mob--
I could take them up in an airplane and have both of them crying for their mommy in 30 seconds.
The Times has no experience with manhood.
9.5
I didn't know that.
Invasion of the Village People, more like.
and to think all this time i thought that nancy and hillary were female.
Nancy Pollution, Hillary Klan-ton, Barney Frank ... these are the women who are leading the Democratic Party. To their credit, they have more in the way of a "package" than John Kerry or Al Gore. But then so does a harem eunuch ...
This reminds me of the islamofascist boobs blowing themselves up, looking for a fight against tanks using rocks
Folkes, we cannot contradict God, and if liberals are impatient, they should note that the fight will come to them soon enough for their sins, and this idiocy of "alpha-ing" themselves to the "frontlines", while hidding "big oil" driving SUVs is going to bite them in the arse about who is really boss.
Let us face it, Dems are only "good" at making fake fights with potemkin superficial people like Pelosi, in essence disorganizing whatever organization there is out there under the flag of false organizing and starting fights they really don't mean to fight in earnest, suicide or behaving in the end being their only options.
Lately they have intensified and oriented themselves toward presuicidal behaviors, indicating, with their recent delusion inducing "victory" in "Congress" and "bipartisanship", that they are moving from orneriness to plain full blown mental illness...
A crook and a drunk! Role models worth emulating in the Democrat world. All you need now is a couple of wife-beaters (Ted Kennedy, call your service) and misogynists (Bill Clinton can still be VICE president ...) and you'll have a complete collection:
Liars, women-haters, man-haters, homosexuals, muslims, thieves, con men, cowards, lawyers, bigots, and God knows, traitors and fools in abundance.
These types of articles are bizarre from start to finish. Once a man accepts the values of the Democratic Party, he cannot be an alpha Male or a manly man. He can be an aggressive man, or an obnoxious man, but not a manly man. Democratic values today are the values of the churlish, the selfish, the lewd, the uncivil, the crass, and whatever the grievance industry decides will enhance its position in the world. To allow one's self to be pulled around by the nose by these shifting schemes of demagogues, is not the sign of a man.
The liberal culture teaches men to act like women to show their sensitivity, and women to act like men to show their independence. It's no wonder these people are wearing each others clothes and having their bodies mutilated to change their sex.
No question,when I see Rahm Emanuel or Chuckie Schumer on tv thoughts of John Wayne, Dick Butkus or Rocky Marciano immediately come to mind, ahhh ha ha ha ha ha !!!
Being obnoxious and pushy is not being macho. Chuck Schumer's high-pitched, whiny voice, and annoying smrik are all desperately metrosexual. A masculine man can be manly just standing still and glaring. And what's so masculine about Jim Webb, a novelist, for goodness sake. He's more like a pit bull than a man.
Newsflash: gun-grabbing is just about the most unmanly political activity imaginable, and both Emanuel and Schumer (especially the later) are among the most prominent gun-grabbers in Congress.
The author appears to be confusing manliness with obnoxiousness.