Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

I'm too shocked to comment.
1 posted on 01/03/2007 1:14:12 PM PST by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
To: Lorianne

More detail humanizes the hard call:

"But Ashley's parents say the move was a humane one, allowing her to receive more care, more interaction with her younger brother and sister, and more of the loving touch of parents and others who can carry her.

As a result, they say in a written account posted on the Web this week, "we will continue to delight in holding her in our arms and Ashley will be moved and taken on trips more frequently and will have more exposure to activities and social gatherings (for example, in the family room, backyard, swing, walks, bathtub, etc.) instead of lying down in her bed staring at TV (or the ceiling) all day long."


2 posted on 01/03/2007 1:16:50 PM PST by MeanWestTexan (Kol Hakavod Lezahal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lorianne

I don't know what to think. Prayers for her and her family.


3 posted on 01/03/2007 1:18:31 PM PST by pandoraou812 ( zero tolerance and dilligaf?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lorianne
To the extent that this girl can be at home and be cared for by her parents, she will have more dignity and more love in her life. If keeping her small facilitates that, then it is a good thing.

If she were to weigh 125 pounds, with aging parents, she'd be shipped off to an institution and cared for by nurses on rotating shifts. Why would that be a better life?

4 posted on 01/03/2007 1:19:37 PM PST by ClearCase_guy (Enoch Powell was right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lorianne
This is sick!

Keeping her "small" for the convenience of the family?

SICK!
8 posted on 01/03/2007 1:24:21 PM PST by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God) .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lorianne

I have a friend, divorced, with a disabled daughter - in a wheelchair, cannot walk. She is now 19, and weighs 185 lbs. No one person can pick her up - it requires at least 2 men - and it is a major problem on a daily basis. The mother (ex-wife) will not face reality and insists her daughter is not overweight, and does not restrict the daughters diet. Because of the excess weight, things a paraplegic can normally do are beyond this girl.

There are no easy choices in these cases. I applaud these parents for doing the best they can and wanting to care for their daughter themselves instead of institutionalizing her.


9 posted on 01/03/2007 1:24:46 PM PST by cinives (On some planets what I do is considered normal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lorianne

I think anyone who is not in their position has no right to pass judgment.


12 posted on 01/03/2007 1:31:59 PM PST by teenyelliott (Soylent green should be made outta liberals...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lorianne

Lord, please grant Your strength to this family.


16 posted on 01/03/2007 1:35:52 PM PST by outofsalt ("If History teaches us anything it's that history rarely teaches us anything")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lorianne
They obviously haven't met the right doctor

17 posted on 01/03/2007 1:35:55 PM PST by Lucky9teen (You can discover more about a person in an hour of play than in a year of conversation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lorianne
My 18 year old son is the mental age of a 10 month-old baby. He walks but with assistance, he has to be bathed, feed, wears diapers and does not speak. He weighs 98 lbs and is 4'11". I am very careful with the amount and kinds of foods that he eats. He loves potato chips, fried potatoes, his special cookies but he does not get all that he wants. That is because I always want to be able to care for him.

How about the parents that give their son growth hormones because they are afraid that he is too short or too skinny and they want him to be more "normal".

These parents are not starving their child, they are not neglecting her in anyway. They just never want to have to institutionalize her. Until you deal with it on a daily basis, don't be so quick to judge the situation.
19 posted on 01/03/2007 1:38:22 PM PST by georgiagirl_pam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lorianne

Wow. What an ethical swamp. I can't imagine what this thread will be like.


22 posted on 01/03/2007 1:44:43 PM PST by gcruse (http://garycruse.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lorianne

Very sad situation. But for the grace of God...


26 posted on 01/03/2007 1:50:09 PM PST by Ilky Hucktar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lorianne

It's a tough choice. But the parents clearly love their child and the girl will do far better growing up with loving parents than in a state nursing home of some sort.

I can't second guess them.


27 posted on 01/03/2007 1:52:04 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lorianne

Didn't we just see an episode of House where a woman was doing nearly the same thing to her daughter so she would be a "little person" like her husband and herself?


28 posted on 01/03/2007 1:52:59 PM PST by Old Professer (The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lorianne

Pet humans (sick). They should let her mature normally.

Aside: If people are going to mess with stuff like this, they ought to make ALL humans 1/2 their size to save on resources. Think about it: if people were pint-sized, they would eat less, you coulsd fit more of them on a plane, etc.

Of course, the scientists and rulers would find a reason to keep themselves normal sized. There's a modern Gulliver story there someplace.


51 posted on 01/03/2007 3:05:07 PM PST by Puddleglum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lorianne
Some say it's also a violation of the medical oath: First do no harm.

Unless you want to rip someone from the womb, limb by limb. Then all bets are off.

I have an aunt, 70 yrs old, who has cared for her severely disabled son all his life. He's now 35. Circumstances and time have finally converged to the point where she is living with another relative and getting help, but the sacrifice that woman has made for her son is immeasurable. The physical toll is unimaginable, much less the emotional one. I find it hard to fault these people.

55 posted on 01/03/2007 3:46:12 PM PST by workerbee (Democrats are a waste of tax money and good oxygen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lorianne

Wow. The decisions some families must face are enormously difficult and complex. I am in no position to judge and can understand the concerns from all directions. There is one thing that appears certain however...her family loves her and is doing what they believe will give her a good quality of life. And that is all I need to know.


58 posted on 01/03/2007 3:56:25 PM PST by pollyannaish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lorianne

God bless this family and their "pillow angel."


123 posted on 01/04/2007 11:01:12 AM PST by Antoninus ( Rudy McRomney as the GOP nominee = President Hillary. Why else do you think the media loves them?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

I too am very shocked at this story, but am riding the fence as I am a parent and have to believe I would always do what I believe is best for my children.
I just HOPE AND PRAY TO GOD that these parents do as they say they will and continue to care for this little girl for as long as they live in the way they are telling everyone they intend.
When people have children they must anticipate that they may not be "normal", healthy children.
I do not agree with the treatment this little girl is receiving as a whole and don't people think these surgeries are hard on this child as well? Does that outweigh the fact that the parents SAY they will always be there for their little girl and carrying her around all the time and from place to place? There are people who get by and continue to take care of their adult children, including carrying them around who are disabled and also do amazing, exceptional things - anyone hear of Dick Hoyt?
Anytime, EVERY TIME that Ashley goes into surgery she risks death. She was given a full hysterectomy, are giving her HUGE doses of hormone therapy, I am not even sure what anti-breast growth therapy/surgery/treatment is...
I don't know what I would do, I am not in their shoes but it just seems wrong and I do hope God takes care of this little Angel. At least we can agree on that.

- georgiagirl_pam - you can not compare this at all to anyone else and what they are going through. That is why there is a debate - it's experimental at best. Your asking if anyone else takes any medication is comparing apples to bananas and irrelevant to the topic.


140 posted on 01/04/2007 11:32:50 AM PST by KTD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lorianne
As far as I am personally concerned, in this particular case it seems like the decision to keep her small is the second questionable decision her parents made.
178 posted on 01/04/2007 12:27:11 PM PST by Psycho_Bunny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lorianne

I'm not going to second-guess the parents' decision on this.


195 posted on 01/04/2007 1:01:27 PM PST by Sloth (The GOP is to DemonRats in politics as Michael Jackson is to Jeffrey Dahmer in babysitting.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson