While nobody should deny King his legacy in regards to California during the Civil War (aka: "The War of Northern Aggression") it was Ronald Reagan's policies that freed hundreds of millions of Europeans from the jackboot of Soviet communism. The placement of Ronald Reagan's statue is entirely warranted and appropriate at the U.S. Capitol. The liberals and the left-wingers will never cease in their hatred of Ronald Reagan...
To: DogByte6RER
p.s. Liberal California critics from the Bay Area suck too!
2 posted on
01/02/2007 8:53:15 PM PST by
DogByte6RER
("Loose lips sink ships")
To: DogByte6RER
Yep. The Lefties back in California will never accept Ronald Reagan.
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus
4 posted on
01/02/2007 9:01:02 PM PST by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: DogByte6RER
While King kept California on the right side during the Civil War, Reagan was a ruthless governor and an actor posing as a statesman, Dodd said in a Sept. 6 posting on his weblog, Librarian in Tie-dye.
This guy Dodd sems to have issues with Ronald Reagan, too bad. Dodd sounds like a total idiot and history will prove him to be exactly that. In fact it already has.
5 posted on
01/02/2007 9:01:32 PM PST by
sgtbono2002
(Peace through strength.)
To: DogByte6RER
Unlike King, Dodd said, Reagan is not in danger of being forgotten. David Dodd accidently reveals his own personal concern - that he is a nobody who will be forgotten. Dodd is sad that he is a microbe among millions of librarians, destined for obscurity. He understands that Reagan was a giant among giants and if there was room he would be on that granite wall in South Dakota. Dodd is injecting himself into this fray to garner a footnote in history.
6 posted on
01/02/2007 9:01:41 PM PST by
Nomorjer Kinov
(If the opposite of "pro" is "con" , what is the opposite of progress?)
To: DogByte6RER
"The liberals and the left-wingers will never cease in their hatred of Ronald Reagan..."And this is exactly what this foolishness is all about!! Build and elevate that statue of The Honorable Ronald Reagan!!
7 posted on
01/02/2007 9:04:52 PM PST by
Nancee
((Nancee Lynn Cheney))
To: DogByte6RER
"While King kept California on the right side during the Civil War, Reagan was a ruthless governor and an actor posing as a statesman, Dodd said in a Sept. 6 posting on his weblog, Librarian in Tie-dye.
Methinks Mr. Dodd has a personal, read emotional, hatred of Reagan. He surely has no grasp of Reagan's history for a "librarian". Typical lefty. Immature, whining, child.
8 posted on
01/02/2007 9:15:42 PM PST by
headstamp
(Nothing lasts forever, Unless it does.)
To: DogByte6RER
Well, there they go again.
9 posted on
01/02/2007 9:19:35 PM PST by
TBP
To: DogByte6RER
Reagan, elected twice as California Gov.
elected twice as Pres. Broke up the Soviets and their strongholds, and that is for starters.
Dodd the librarian needs to get a real education.
the 60s are over, get over it.
10 posted on
01/02/2007 9:24:33 PM PST by
SoCalPol
(We Need A Border Fence Now)
To: DogByte6RER
11 posted on
01/02/2007 9:47:33 PM PST by
Cacique
(quos Deus vult perdere, prius dementat ( Islamia Delenda Est ))
To: DogByte6RER
I'm sixty, born in Hollywood, raised in Long Beach, lived here in Riverside for twenty years and never heard of King. I'd bet many more native Californian's haven't heard of him either. As two statues from each state are allowed there, Father Serra and Ronald Reagan being two of the most famous names associated with California seems appropriate.
It would seem logical that Mr. King's history and contributions to California would be more recognized thus appreciated in Sacramento.
13 posted on
01/02/2007 9:56:31 PM PST by
rockinqsranch
(Dems, Libs, Socialists...call 'em what you will...They ALL have fairies livin' in their trees.)
To: DogByte6RER
King had a major local impact, which is very important. Governor and later President Reagan had local impact, which is very important, and also had huge international impact, which is even more important. Nobody needs to slight Mr. King while saying that President Reagan deserves to be there instead. It's an easy case to make, aside from Reagan-haters still stuck in 1986.
To: DogByte6RER
Reagan exceptionally worthy of national commemoration,
Yes indeedy.
16 posted on
01/02/2007 10:41:53 PM PST by
garylmoore
(Faith is the assurance of things unseen.)
To: DogByte6RER
Others in the hall "likely to be forgotten" (sarcasm)
Samuel Adams, Massachusetts
William Jennings Bryan, Nebraska
John Burke, North Dakota
John C. Calhoun, South Carolina
Henry Clay, Kentucky
Jefferson Davis, Mississippi
Dwight D. Eisenhower, Kansas
James A. Garfield, Ohio
Sam Houston, Texas
Kamehameha I, Hawaii
Andrew Jackson, Tennessee
Robert E. Lee, Virginia
Huey Long, Louisiana
Will Rogers, Oklahoma
George Washington, Virginia
Daniel Webster, New Hampshire
John Winthrop, Massachusetts
Brigham Young, Utah
17 posted on
01/03/2007 12:23:35 AM PST by
newzjunkey
(What Saddam did to his people: http://www.9neesan.com/massgraves/)
To: DogByte6RER
Critics say the measure was passed hastily Aug. 31, without allowing the public a chance to weigh in.Oh, cry me a river. These "critics" are scumbag Democrats, and the Kalifornia legislature is overwhelmingly scumbag Democrat.
To: DogByte6RER
While nobody should deny King his legacy in regards to California during the Civil War (aka: "The War of Northern Aggression") Another Confederate-apologist.
22 posted on
01/03/2007 8:22:22 AM PST by
Smogger
(It's the WOT Stupid)
To: DogByte6RER
This just shows me that Unitarians are evil, hateful people.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson