p.s. Liberal California critics from the Bay Area suck too!
Posted on 01/02/2007 8:51:56 PM PST by DogByte6RER
p.s. Liberal California critics from the Bay Area suck too!
For the record they can't do anything about it we have new law here in Cali that you need least two recongiable state citizen in state capitol so that other guy is for 1800s Ronnie is for this generation
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus
While King “kept California on the right side during the Civil War,” Reagan was a “ruthless governor” and an “actor posing as a statesman,” Dodd said in a Sept. 6 posting on his weblog, “Librarian in Tie-dye.”
This guy Dodd sems to have issues with Ronald Reagan, too bad. Dodd sounds like a total idiot and history will prove him to be exactly that. In fact it already has.
David Dodd accidently reveals his own personal concern - that he is a nobody who will be forgotten. Dodd is sad that he is a microbe among millions of librarians, destined for obscurity. He understands that Reagan was a giant among giants and if there was room he would be on that granite wall in South Dakota. Dodd is injecting himself into this fray to garner a footnote in history.
And this is exactly what this foolishness is all about!! Build and elevate that statue of The Honorable Ronald Reagan!!
Well, there they go again.
Reagan, elected twice as California Gov.
elected twice as Pres. Broke up the Soviets and their strongholds, and that is for starters.
Dodd the librarian needs to get a real education.
the 60s are over, get over it.
btt
That's a law? Lol- do the statues have to wear helmets too? Ya know, incase they fall over and bump their noggins? Yous guys got some wierd laws I must say.
I'm sixty, born in Hollywood, raised in Long Beach, lived here in Riverside for twenty years and never heard of King. I'd bet many more native Californian's haven't heard of him either. As two statues from each state are allowed there, Father Serra and Ronald Reagan being two of the most famous names associated with California seems appropriate.
It would seem logical that Mr. King's history and contributions to California would be more recognized thus appreciated in Sacramento.
Amen!
King had a major local impact, which is very important. Governor and later President Reagan had local impact, which is very important, and also had huge international impact, which is even more important. Nobody needs to slight Mr. King while saying that President Reagan deserves to be there instead. It's an easy case to make, aside from Reagan-haters still stuck in 1986.
Reagan “exceptionally worthy of national commemoration,”
Yes indeedy.
Samuel Adams, Massachusetts William Jennings Bryan, Nebraska John Burke, North Dakota John C. Calhoun, South Carolina Henry Clay, Kentucky Jefferson Davis, Mississippi Dwight D. Eisenhower, Kansas James A. Garfield, Ohio Sam Houston, Texas Kamehameha I, Hawaii Andrew Jackson, Tennessee Robert E. Lee, Virginia Huey Long, Louisiana Will Rogers, Oklahoma George Washington, Virginia Daniel Webster, New Hampshire John Winthrop, Massachusetts Brigham Young, Utah
Oh, cry me a river. These "critics" are scumbag Democrats, and the Kalifornia legislature is overwhelmingly scumbag Democrat.
What???? No Mickey Mouse??
I drove right past Daniel Webster's birthplace yesterday.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.