Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Great Illegal Immigration Myth of '06
Human Events ^ | 12/27/06 | John Hawkins

Posted on 12/28/2006 5:14:01 PM PST by WatchingInAmazement

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-117 next last

1 posted on 12/28/2006 5:14:04 PM PST by WatchingInAmazement
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: WatchingInAmazement

Bush could have led the tough on campaign but instead left us to assume he would veto it if it passed.

Bush was defeated last month, from now on it will be like watching a walking dead man.


2 posted on 12/28/2006 5:20:48 PM PST by Old Professer (The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WatchingInAmazement

Evidently the House Republicans think their position on immgration was detrimental. They removed Sensenbrenner from any position of authority.


3 posted on 12/28/2006 5:30:11 PM PST by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WatchingInAmazement



I agree, illegal immigration costing the Repubs the majority is a myth, and our losses are trying to be spun into "you had better support amnesty or yo will lose to" nonsense.


I wasn't aware that Kondracke or Barnes ran for office for instance.


4 posted on 12/28/2006 5:31:59 PM PST by padre35 (We are surrounded, that simplifies our problem Chesty Puller)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ben Ficklin
"Evidently the House Republicans think their position on immgration was detrimental."

Then why did they vote so overwhelmingly in favor of that position (HR 4437)?

5 posted on 12/28/2006 5:40:57 PM PST by Czar ( StillFedUptotheTeeth@Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Czar

Why? I guess they thought it would get them re-elected.


6 posted on 12/28/2006 5:51:32 PM PST by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Ben Ficklin
So, basically you're up to your usual pro-illegal alien/OBL flacking, spreading as much disinformation as possible.

Nice try but no tamale...

7 posted on 12/28/2006 5:56:08 PM PST by Czar ( StillFedUptotheTeeth@Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: WatchingInAmazement

If I am mistaken J.D. Hayworth voted against HR4437 ( the house immigration bill )


8 posted on 12/28/2006 6:07:27 PM PST by Sharks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sharks

If I am NOT mistaken J.D. Hayworth voted against HR4437 ( the house immigration bill )


9 posted on 12/28/2006 6:08:02 PM PST by Sharks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: WatchingInAmazement

I think Republicans were harmed because after six years in power, they had little to nothing to claim as immigration reform.

When you are given "power" by the voters, they expect it to be used wisely.

The voters want a better immigration system. They didn't get it. Hence, they throw out the bums that wasted six years, with plenty of earmarks, but no immigration reform.

(IOW many people aren't strongly "idealogical" about immigration. Yet they know it is broken, and they want a better system.)

And for the ones that ARE idealogical about immigration, the Republicans fail on that count; one house one way, the other house the other way.

All around, the Republicans were spanked for doing nothing.


10 posted on 12/28/2006 6:18:51 PM PST by truth_seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Czar
Do you think they removed Sensenbrenner because of his work on Net Neutrality or some other issue besides immigration?
11 posted on 12/28/2006 6:21:50 PM PST by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Czar

Give me a plausible reason why Sensenbrenner was removed.


12 posted on 12/28/2006 6:24:20 PM PST by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: WatchingInAmazement

Since you posted a Hawkins article from Human Events, you should read what he has to say about the Corsi and the NAU conspiracy nuts.


13 posted on 12/28/2006 6:36:44 PM PST by Rex Anderson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WatchingInAmazement

"Randy Graf, a tough on illegal immigration conservative, who was attempting to retain a seat held by Rep. Jim Kolbe, was torpedoed by the Republican Party."

Expect more of the same in '08. Look how it's already started here...Tancredo for instance...and next they will be attacking Duncan Hunter...the RNC with Martinez as the pointman, thanks to Bush, will be doing everything in its power to 'eliminate' candidates who want to secure our borders and enforce our current immigration laws.

Of course, if the OBL is successful in passing their CIR legislation anytime soon, promoting an anti-OBL candidate for '08, will be a mute point?


14 posted on 12/29/2006 2:16:13 AM PST by Kimberly GG (PATRIOTS MARCH TO "TAKE BACK AMERICA" (www.lframerica.com ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WatchingInAmazement
Bookmarked for future reference and use. And I suspect, a lot of 'use'.

:-)



15 posted on 12/29/2006 6:25:53 AM PST by Condor51 (Mayor Daley (D-Chi) For POTUS . Really, why not? He's more conservative than Rudy! /s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WatchingInAmazement
House Republican had ZERO credibility on illegal immigration with a Republican President pushing amnesty. That hurt.
16 posted on 12/29/2006 6:41:21 AM PST by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truth_seeker
IOW many people aren't strongly "idealogical" about immigration. Yet they know it is broken, and they want a better system.

Enforcing existing laws would be a start. Unfortunately, the Bush administration has a worse record on enforcement than even Clinton's.

17 posted on 12/29/2006 6:50:02 AM PST by lucysmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: 1_Inch_Group; 2sheep; 2Trievers; 3AngelaD; 3pools; 3rdcanyon; 4Freedom; 4ourprogeny; 7.62 x 51mm; ..

ping


18 posted on 12/29/2006 7:28:05 AM PST by gubamyster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Old Professer
I disagree that Bush was defeated last month. The way that I see it, Bush won last month. He finally has the Congress that he wants and that will allow him to achieve certain key goals that a conservative Republican Congress would not allow.

Just look at how quick and upbeat the administration response was -- that now they will get their immigration bill passed.
19 posted on 12/29/2006 7:45:40 AM PST by Iwo Jima ("Close the border. Then we'll talk.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jpsb
House Republican had ZERO credibility on illegal immigration with a Republican President pushing amnesty. That hurt.

And that my friend, is the bottom line!

20 posted on 12/29/2006 7:53:29 AM PST by WatchingInAmazement (President DUNCAN HUNTER 2008! http://www.house.gov/hunter/border1.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-117 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson