Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Edwards's Theme: U.S. Poverty
Wall Street Journal Online ^ | December 28, 2006 | JACKIE CALMES

Posted on 12/28/2006 10:51:11 AM PST by kingattax

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last
To: kingattax

Yesterday's NYT editorial written by Paul Dufus Krugman also focused on "Poverty" and how England is doing so much better than the USA in that regard. Was Dregs Krugman setting the table for his buddy Edwards? It's an interesting coincidence, otherwise. I hope more Dims jump on that band wagon 'cause I think the poverty issue is headed towards the cliff. I just love it when the enemy is so completely out of touch with the electorate.


21 posted on 12/28/2006 11:17:31 AM PST by downtownconservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BunnySlippers
Miliions, and millions, and millions and millions of Americans go hungry every day! /sarc


22 posted on 12/28/2006 11:17:35 AM PST by kingattax (99 % of liberals give the rest a bad name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: kingattax
Edwards's Theme: U.S. Poverty

Yes, the ol' wealth-redistribution mantra...the poverty he's talkin' about will be those of us who will have our incomes appropriated "for the common good".

Using the simpleton method, one can look at the issue as since 10% of the population holds 90% of the wealth, then 90% don't and with their votes for giving the money to them, I can get elected!

23 posted on 12/28/2006 11:18:21 AM PST by traditional1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: darkwing104
Edwards leaves no doubt about it that radical redistribution of wealth is what he would do as President. He is hoping to hook the black vote with promises of wealth equality and blaming Republicans for Katrina and all the injustices of what he would probably call "life's lottery".

Edwards hasn't said how he would fund all this unearned prosperity, but the math says that anyone doing well in this country should be very afraid.

24 posted on 12/28/2006 11:18:29 AM PST by Sender ("How do you know what the fish think? You're not a fish." -Hui Zi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: kingattax
Real easy response: compare the "poor" in the US to the "rich" in other countries.

Once you realize that our "poor" are basically on a par with all but the super rich elsewhere the debate is over.

Then compare our "poor" to the "average" in the rest of the world.

Then compare the "super rich" in the rest of the world to trial lawyers, like Edwards.

Game, set, match and there will be lots of folks to contribute the rope to lynch Edwards.
25 posted on 12/28/2006 11:19:16 AM PST by Phsstpok (Often wrong, but never in doubt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio
The War on Poverty is a 33 year old quagmire we need to find a way out of.

Try 40.

26 posted on 12/28/2006 11:19:18 AM PST by BeHoldAPaleHorse (Dyslexics of the world, UNTIE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

"has there ever been a bigger execise in futility ?"

This crap just never stops! It's the same thing every time the Dems think they're in power. Poverty/Racism/Guns/The environment.......


27 posted on 12/28/2006 11:19:49 AM PST by dljordan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: samtheman
The edwards battle cry , Onward into the past !!!
28 posted on 12/28/2006 11:20:50 AM PST by fantom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: BunnySlippers
Miliions, and millions, and millions and millions of Americans go hungry every day! /sarc

I'm hungry now. It's lunch time and I left my wallet at home :(

29 posted on 12/28/2006 11:21:30 AM PST by Domandred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

Today's "poor" are middle-class by the standards of my youth. Almost all of them have color TV, most have a microwave oven, a majority have a car and air-conditioning, and many own their own homes.

Democrats are obsessed with the "gap" between the so-called poor and the so-called rich. It's the wrong question. The real question is how many people in America lack the necessities of life. Edwards doesn't want to face that answer.



30 posted on 12/28/2006 11:21:30 AM PST by freespirited (Honk for disbarment of Mike Nifong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fantom

Onward Shyster Soldiers, Marching Off to Sue!


31 posted on 12/28/2006 11:21:37 AM PST by samtheman (The Democrats are the DhimmiGods of the New Religion of PC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

Most of those in "poverty" as the Breck Girl defines it have more TVs, more cell phones/blackberries, nicer tennis shoes and more bling than I'll ever have.


32 posted on 12/28/2006 11:22:16 AM PST by peggybac (Tolerance is the virtue of believing in nothing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Peach
How can Edwards claim this poverty theme with a straight face?

SOCIALISTS believe all is lost UNTIL every person in the nation has equal assets, with only people in POWER [him] deciding what level of equality is correct for all!!

He is the nation's new poverty pimp!!

33 posted on 12/28/2006 11:25:32 AM PST by PISANO
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

The worst part is that lots of Americans will fall for this line of crap


34 posted on 12/28/2006 11:25:39 AM PST by StoneColdTaxHater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

Perhaps Rosie O'Donnelll trying to get into a size 6 of any fashion?

The Great Society has turned America into a Great Quagmire.

Black folk have a 50% drop our rate from school; fatherhood has become a varsity sport and abortion on demand kills, and the District of Columbia has an HIV positive rate among adult citizens that is higher than 24 sub-Saharan countries.

Yup. What we need are more poverty programs to keep folks poor.

Mr. Edwards is a raging megalomaniac with no ideas about anything but how to pander to poor people - who don't vote.

God, he's stupid.


35 posted on 12/28/2006 11:26:13 AM PST by RexBeach (In war there is no substitute for victory. - Douglas MacArthur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PISANO

Oh, that's what we should call Edwards! A poverty pimp. I like it.


36 posted on 12/28/2006 11:28:21 AM PST by Peach (The Clintons pardoned more terrorists than they captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Peach
How can Edwards claim this poverty theme with a straight face? Americans have never been wealthier and more people own their own homes than ever before in our nation's history.

One of the most popular gifts this year were large screen HDTV's. As someone once said in India: "I want to live in America where even the poor are fat."

Absolutely. Recently, Rush Limbaugh cited a study by a scholar from AEI (Nicholas Eberstadt) who demonstrated that today's "poverty" standards are equivalent to US middle class living standards of the 1960s.

Transfer payments aren't included in calculating "poverty income," etc....

AEI Poverty Study

37 posted on 12/28/2006 11:30:16 AM PST by CDB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: CDB

Hey - thanks for that link. I've saved it in a file.


38 posted on 12/28/2006 11:32:26 AM PST by Peach (The Clintons pardoned more terrorists than they captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: BeHoldAPaleHorse
2007 (well, almost) - 1964 = 33.

War against subtraction going on for 39 - 4 = 15 posts. :-).

39 posted on 12/28/2006 11:33:26 AM PST by KarlInOhio (Baker's Iraq Surrender Group - warming up the last helicopter out of Baghdad.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

Of course a rich, ambulance-chasing trial lawyer knows EVERYTHING about poverty, doesn't he?


40 posted on 12/28/2006 11:34:06 AM PST by RockinRight (To compare Congress to drunken sailors is an insult to drunken sailors. - Ronald W. Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson