Avery and Singer do not deny the greenhouse effect but state that it is small. They state, "What we're suggesting is that both history and the recent pattern of things, particularly the warming before 1940, would indicate that the CO2 impact is a good deal smaller than the climate models which are telling us to be frightened." The left wants us to be frightened so that they can destroy capitalism and freedom.
1 posted on
12/26/2006 10:36:28 AM PST by
wagglebee
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-52 next last
To: wagglebee
2 posted on
12/26/2006 10:38:38 AM PST by
Fiddlstix
(Warning! This Is A Subliminal Tagline! Read it at your own risk!(Presented by TagLines R US))
To: wagglebee
3 posted on
12/26/2006 10:41:14 AM PST by
lesser_satan
(EKTHELTHIOR!!!)
To: wagglebee
Avery and Singer are obviously right wing traitors in collaboration with evil corporations against our mother earth!!!!!!!
4 posted on
12/26/2006 10:41:37 AM PST by
Dreagon
To: wagglebee
And promote the dictatorships of the elite.
5 posted on
12/26/2006 10:41:54 AM PST by
cinives
(On some planets what I do is considered normal.)
To: wagglebee
It shows how crucial Kyoto is....
:-P
6 posted on
12/26/2006 10:43:11 AM PST by
Irish_Thatcherite
(A vote for Bertie Ahern is a vote for Gerry Adams!|What if I lecture Americans about America?)
To: wagglebee
I'm sure Al Gore and his ilk will sweep this under the rug.
To: wagglebee
Somebody needs to slap Al Gore up side the head. Tell chicken little that the sky is not falling.
To: wagglebee
Good. Now that it's settled will someone kindly tell Al Gore to STFU!!!!
9 posted on
12/26/2006 10:45:56 AM PST by
Grizzled Bear
("Does not play well with others.")
To: wagglebee
The general warming of global temperatures in recent decades appears to mostly be the result of a regular, sunspot induced climate cycle that has been occurring roughly every 1500 years for at least the past one million years.Michael Crichton Is Right!
10 posted on
12/26/2006 10:46:25 AM PST by
A. Pole
(Gore:We are the most powerful force of nature.We are changing the relationship between Earth and Sun)
To: wagglebee
"Additionally, scientific analysis of ice cores from Greenland and the Antarctic found that there is a clear record of a moderate, abrupt 1500-year climate change cycle running all the way through all the major warmings and all the ice ages. Cores taken from the seabed of six oceans, including the Atlantic, the Pacific and the Arabian Sea have also revealed the same unmistakable 1500-year cycle."
Evolutionist and extreme liberal scientist Bill Nye the Science Guy had this on one of his programs, but made sure the kids knew it was going to be horribly worse this time because of their parent's cars.
12 posted on
12/26/2006 10:48:10 AM PST by
huldah1776
(Worthy is the Lamb.)
To: wagglebee
Paging Doctor Al Gore! Paging Doctor Al Gore!
13 posted on
12/26/2006 10:48:54 AM PST by
2ndDivisionVet
(Hailey Barbour/John Bolton 2008)
To: wagglebee
CLIMATE CHANGE DENIERS!!!
14 posted on
12/26/2006 10:49:22 AM PST by
poobear
(Political Left, continually accusing their foes of what THEY themselves do every day.)
To: wagglebee
To quote little Alex from A Clockwork Orange, "Welly welly welly welly well!"
16 posted on
12/26/2006 10:56:00 AM PST by
domenad
(In all things, in all ways, at all times, let honor guide me.)
To: wagglebee
The article doesn't even mention the work of Svensmark that provides experimental confirmation of the mechanism: it's not a cycle in the amount of heat the sun produces, but in solar magnetism, which shields the earth from cosmic rays. Cosmic rays, as confirmed by Svensmark's experiments, are a key component in cloud formation, a cooling process. His calculations show that 85% of global warming observed in the past 70 years can be attributed to this effect. I'm not sure whether that's directly, or including the amplification by the release of CO_2 from the oceans as they warm. If it's the direct effect only, between that an agricultural methane, surely we've got the whole thing explained w/o any appeal to industrual emissions.
17 posted on
12/26/2006 10:56:53 AM PST by
The_Reader_David
(And when they behead your own people in the wars which are to come, then you will know. . .)
To: zot
18 posted on
12/26/2006 10:58:33 AM PST by
GreyFriar
( (3rd Armored Division - Spearhead))
To: wagglebee
Sens Rockefeller and Snowe deeply saddened.
20 posted on
12/26/2006 11:05:25 AM PST by
rocksblues
(Do unto others as they do unto you!)
To: wagglebee
Meanwhile over in the eco-wackos' camp...
21 posted on
12/26/2006 11:07:34 AM PST by
BenLurkin
("The entire remedy is with the people." - W. H. Harrison)
To: wagglebee
22 posted on
12/26/2006 11:09:20 AM PST by
Old Professer
(The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
To: wagglebee
I'm willing to believe the sun is responsible for global warming, however the dates refered to in the article lead to a 900-1000 year cycle and not a 1500 year cycle.
To: wagglebee
Fred Singer also did some important debunking of anti-nuclear hysteria.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-52 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson