Skip to comments.
Probe of Islamic ties 'obstructed' by feds
WorldNetDaily ^
| December 23, 2006
| Art Moore
Posted on 12/23/2006 8:06:54 AM PST by kc8ukw
Federal officials were "outrageously obstructive" during a congressional probe examining possible Islamic terrorist and foreign ties to the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing, according to a congressman who disclosed to WND some of the highlights of a subcommittee report scheduled for release next week.
(Excerpt) Read more at worldnetdaily.com ...
TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: enemywithin; fellowtravelers; gramsci; islam; okc; taqiya; wnd; worldnetdaily
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-52 next last
To: truthaboveall; doug from upland
Heads up, folks! Jayna is back in the news!
21
posted on
12/23/2006 8:51:52 AM PST
by
TXnMA
("Allah": Satan's current alias...)
To: 3AngelaD
"But I am trying to think through why our government would not want us to know that Islam was involved in the Oklahoma City bombing."
The Clinton administration was under heavy pressure that they blamed on the 'vast right wing conspiracy'. Every where they looked they found evidence of this 'vast right wing conspiracy'. Even if it wasn't there. Other things that were there were discounted or overlooked since these things did not fit the template. IOW, if you're looking for a Timothy McVey, you'll find one. If you're not looking for an Islamic terrorist, you keep looking until you find a McVey.
22
posted on
12/23/2006 8:53:38 AM PST
by
DugwayDuke
(Conservative have so many principles that they won't even vote for themselves.)
To: kc8ukw
23
posted on
12/23/2006 8:53:52 AM PST
by
Gritty
(A 'criminal' approach gives terrorists all the rights of criminals - Mark Steyn)
To: kc8ukw
Thanks for posting this!
I wonder what the FIBbers told Rohrabacher they did with all the surveillance camera tapes they have refused to release?
24
posted on
12/23/2006 8:56:25 AM PST
by
TXnMA
("Allah": Satan's current alias...)
To: DugwayDuke
Okay, I buy that, but why then has the Bush admistration gone along for the ride since taking over? Who benefits?
25
posted on
12/23/2006 9:00:56 AM PST
by
3AngelaD
(ic.)
To: All
Definately something that makes you say hmmm.
I'm not big for conspiracy theories but I think this needs to be seriously investigated.
To: kc8ukw
I dunno, beyond a talking point, what purpose does all this serve? Truth? We're a long way from there. All we have are questions. Even if the worst was true, what difference would it make?
After 9/11, we know what we need to know about the Islamists. We only lack the will to really do anything about it.
As far as Neo-Nazi groups go, which is not very far, it's hard for me to see how extreme ideologues like Islamists and Nazis could get beyond the hatred of the other long enough to mount an "operation" together.
I still buy the official version here, that Oklahoma City was a local "operation". And even if it wasn't, we already have more than enough reason to resist Islamic influence and fight Islamist violence.
27
posted on
12/23/2006 9:01:31 AM PST
by
outdriving
(Diversity is a nice place to visit, but I wouldn't want to live there.)
To: outdriving
I still buy the official version here, that Oklahoma City was a local "operation". You obviously weren't around here (FR) for the hundreds of posts re OKC. The FBI's case is bogus -- and built on demonstrable lies.
28
posted on
12/23/2006 9:07:33 AM PST
by
TXnMA
("Allah": Satan's current alias...)
To: outdriving
BTW, It should also not be forgotten that the Clinton justice department did unjustly slaughter 80 some innocent people in the pursuit of several criminals in Waco, Texas.
29
posted on
12/23/2006 9:20:08 AM PST
by
outdriving
(Diversity is a nice place to visit, but I wouldn't want to live there.)
To: TXnMA
You missed my point.
It was: "so what?".
We are still fighting the Crusades all over again. The "truth" about Oklahoma City won't change anything.
30
posted on
12/23/2006 9:23:54 AM PST
by
outdriving
(Diversity is a nice place to visit, but I wouldn't want to live there.)
To: outdriving
"BTW, It should also not be forgotten that the Clinton justice department did unjustly slaughter 80 some innocent people in the pursuit of several criminals in Waco, Texas." More accurately, that should read, "...in the pursuit of a few (according to BATF) "illegal" gun parts in Waco, Texas."
~~~~~~~~~~
" The "truth" about Oklahoma City won't change anything."
~~~~~~~~~~
"...It should also not be forgotten..."
versus
"so what?" "truth...won't change anything."
Contradictory back-to-back posts, newbie... Your disdain for the truth would do Freeh/Reno's "Justice" Department proud.
31
posted on
12/23/2006 9:50:32 AM PST
by
TXnMA
("Allah": Satan's current alias...)
To: 3AngelaD
But I am trying to think through why our government would not want us to know that Islam was involved in the Oklahoma City bombing.Two words; "BILL CLINTON"
32
posted on
12/23/2006 9:57:43 AM PST
by
PISANO
To: PISANO
But why then has the Bush admistration collaborated in the coverup since taking over? Who benefits?
33
posted on
12/23/2006 10:00:09 AM PST
by
3AngelaD
(ic.)
To: TXnMA
"Contradictory back-to-back posts, newbie... Your disdain for the truth would do Freeh/Reno's "Justice" Department proud."
Contradictory? Not at all. Just because I call the truth as I see it in two incidents? Part of the "explanation" of Oklahoma City is outrage over Waco. Makes sense.
"Newbie" I love that. I have spent 51 years on this earth. How old are you? Just because I have only recently burdened the other's opinions here with mine, they are more suspect?
34
posted on
12/23/2006 10:08:17 AM PST
by
outdriving
(Diversity is a nice place to visit, but I wouldn't want to live there.)
To: varon
The feds made every patriotic citizen with a weapon, willing to defend his/her country feel like they were the enemy.What else would you expect of a Clinton-led justice department?
35
posted on
12/23/2006 10:09:58 AM PST
by
JimRed
("Hey, hey, Teddy K., how many girls did you drown today?" (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help m)
To: kc8ukw
Now that is a question that should be answered by Bubba Clinton.
There have been many articles about the interference of European factions in the OK bombing. There has also been information regarding the Philippine connection with Terry,?(can't remember his last name [Nichols?]). Perhaps if he were wrung out again we might get more information? For all intents and purposes the OK bombing looked just like the Marine Barracks bombing in Lebanon and the Khobar Towers. There is a definite link.
36
posted on
12/23/2006 10:14:20 AM PST
by
Doc91678
(Doc91678)
To: outdriving
I have spent 51 years on this earth. How old are you? Let's just say that I qualified to vote before you appeared on this planet...
~~~~~~~~~~~~
The "truth" about Oklahoma City won't change anything.
Au contraire. The "truth" about Oklahoma City should put a significant number of Clinton-era Feds -- and a several State actors -- behind bars. That's a "change" worth working toward. (Unless, of course, you, yourself, are a FedShill...)
37
posted on
12/23/2006 10:28:42 AM PST
by
TXnMA
("Allah": Satan's current alias...)
To: pinz-n-needlez
38
posted on
12/23/2006 10:32:57 AM PST
by
kalee
(No burka for me....EVER!)
To: TXnMA
"I have spent 51 years on this earth. How old are you?
Let's just say that I qualified to vote before you appeared on this planet..."
So you're at least 72, right? Since the right to vote was lowered to eighteen the year I turned that age.
~~~~~~~~~~~~
"The "truth" about Oklahoma City won't change anything.
Au contraire. The "truth" about Oklahoma City should put a significant number of Clinton-era Feds -- and a several State actors -- behind bars. That's a "change" worth working toward. (Unless, of course, you, yourself, are a FedShill...)"
Nice try. I will ignore the personal attack, for now. Again, I say: "so what?". Answer my damn question. And do not try to guilt me by association that does not exist with some (FedShill?) thing going on.
39
posted on
12/23/2006 11:02:58 AM PST
by
outdriving
(Diversity is a nice place to visit, but I wouldn't want to live there.)
To: TXnMA
"I have spent 51 years on this earth. How old are you?
Let's just say that I qualified to vote before you appeared on this planet..."
I messed up in my last post. You said you were qualified to vote in 1954, before I appeared on this planet.
So if you where at least 21 in 1954, you are at least 73 years old. Correct?
40
posted on
12/23/2006 11:13:14 AM PST
by
outdriving
(Diversity is a nice place to visit, but I wouldn't want to live there.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-52 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson