Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Military Forces Chief in Mideast to Retire:
Fox News ^ | Wednesday, December 20, 2006 | Nick Simeone

Posted on 12/20/2006 10:10:58 AM PST by Army MP Retired

Central Command Chief Gen. John P. Abizaid, who became the top U.S. general in the region in July of 2003, will turn over his command in March. He took the post four months after the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq and has served longer in this position than any other previous commander.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: faux; fox; iraq; military; newathtml
NO WHERE in this story is this headline supported !!! Fox has apparently "crossed over." So, again - I ask WTF???!!!
1 posted on 12/20/2006 10:11:01 AM PST by Army MP Retired
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Army MP Retired

I wouldn't be surprised. The job stress is rather extreme.


2 posted on 12/20/2006 10:13:19 AM PST by kinoxi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Army MP Retired
The head of the U.S. forces in the Middle East plans to retire early next year, U.S. military officials have confirmed.
3 posted on 12/20/2006 10:14:28 AM PST by elc (Slingin' away)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Army MP Retired
WASHINGTON — The head of the U.S. forces in the Middle East plans to retire early next year, U.S. military officials have confirmed.
4 posted on 12/20/2006 10:14:58 AM PST by DTogo (I haven't left the GOP, the GOP left me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Army MP Retired

Read it "Military Forces" as an adjective and a noun. Relax.


5 posted on 12/20/2006 10:16:26 AM PST by GraniteStateConservative (...He had committed no crime against America so I did not bring him here...-- Worst.President.Ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Army MP Retired

The headline states the military is FORCING him to retire....? This is not supported in the story whatsoever!


6 posted on 12/20/2006 10:16:51 AM PST by Army MP Retired (There Will Be Many False Prophets)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Army MP Retired

I think they mean he is head of Military Forces, not that he is forced to resign - is that what you are referring to?


7 posted on 12/20/2006 10:16:59 AM PST by SF Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Army MP Retired
If you google the General for recent news......it's being widely reported. March he is retiring
8 posted on 12/20/2006 10:18:03 AM PST by Jeffrey_D. (Seek first to understand, then to be understood)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Army MP Retired

It's the typical Fox News playing games with words. They could have left off the word "Forces" and it would have given a clear meaning. The MSM has been trying to connect the surge of troop idea with the General's retirement but the retirement plan was in early '06 from what I'm hearing and has nothing to do with the surge idea.


9 posted on 12/20/2006 10:18:09 AM PST by tobyhill (The War on Terrorism is not for the weak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GraniteStateConservative

oh... jeeze I feel S T U P I D. ty


10 posted on 12/20/2006 10:18:13 AM PST by Army MP Retired (There Will Be Many False Prophets)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill
The MSM has been trying to connect the surge of troop idea with the General's retirement but the retirement plan was in early '06 from what I'm hearing and has nothing to do with the surge idea.

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/12/20/world/middleeast/20abizaid.html

11 posted on 12/20/2006 10:26:35 AM PST by M. Dodge Thomas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: M. Dodge Thomas
I know what the Slimes and rest of the idiot MSM is saying but while he maybe against the idea there has not been a decision made so his retirement can't be based on the idea that hasn't been accepted. I believe the President will surge the troops and I believe the mission will be clear.
12 posted on 12/20/2006 10:42:00 AM PST by tobyhill (The War on Terrorism is not for the weak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Army MP Retired
Statutorily, it's the US Armed Forces, not the Military Forces, so I see where you're coming from. But I did manage to read it correctly the first time, so....
13 posted on 12/20/2006 10:44:01 AM PST by Caesar Soze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Army MP Retired

The military is not forcing the General to retire, it is a very poorly written headline. {Maybe they wanted to confuse people, and they did}.


14 posted on 12/20/2006 1:06:34 PM PST by USS Alaska (Nuke the terrorist savages - In Honor of Standing Wolf)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson