Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
To: ShadowDancer
2 posted on
12/20/2006 5:53:04 AM PST by
raybbr
(You think it's bad now - wait till the anchor babies start to vote.)
To: ShadowDancer
I don't understand why the government insisted on keeping this secret for so long. If the Lennon surveillance didn't amount to much, why not just give the author the files when he first asked for them?
To: ShadowDancer
The FBI had unsuccessfully argued that an unnamed foreign government secretly provided the information, and releasing the documents could lead to diplomatic, political or economic retaliation against the United States. Geez, why not just say "the dog ate the files"? It wouldn't be any more absurd, and at least they'd get points for having a sense of humor about the whole embarassment.
5 posted on
12/20/2006 5:57:27 AM PST by
steve-b
(It's hard to be religious when certain people don't get struck by lightning.)
To: ShadowDancer
Saw a piece on Lennon's struggle with the INS recently.Lennon claimed repeatedly that they wanted to stay in the US so that they could look for Yoko's daughter who,it was claimed,had been "kidnapped" by her father.
But they got caught at least once admitting that they wanted to stay because New York was *the* place to be for creative people like themselves.
If Lennon had abided by the INS's decisions,he'd still be alive today.
7 posted on
12/20/2006 5:58:35 AM PST by
Gay State Conservative
("The meaning of peace is the absence of opposition to socialism."-Karl Marx)
To: ShadowDancer
We have so many "important" issues to take care of dontcha know.
10 posted on
12/20/2006 5:59:16 AM PST by
unixfox
(The 13th Amendment Abolished Slavery, The 16th Amendment Reinstated It !)
To: ShadowDancer
So he really WAS just a washed-up dopehead hippie?
11 posted on
12/20/2006 6:00:09 AM PST by
atomicpossum
(Replies must follow approved guidelines or you will be kill-filed without appeal.)
To: ShadowDancer
But is Paul dead or isn't he?
14 posted on
12/20/2006 6:00:57 AM PST by
Thane_Banquo
("Give a man a fish, make him a Democrat. Teach a man to fish, make him a Republican.")
To: ShadowDancer
Just a Dork married to one of the ugliest women in the world.
15 posted on
12/20/2006 6:02:09 AM PST by
sgtbono2002
(The fourth estate is a fifth column.)
To: All
This is the best use of my taxes, to annoy a celebrity I mildly dislike.
To: ShadowDancer
I'd say the FBI did a good job stringing the case along until nobody cares. 25 years is the right length of time to declassify secrets, anyway.
The Brits were most likely the source of the information. Their Official Secrets Act is a bit different from ours. Something like the life of everyone concerned, plus 20 years. One of the people indirectly concerned, Yoko Ono, is still alive.
28 posted on
12/20/2006 6:09:29 AM PST by
jimtorr
To: ShadowDancer
Yoko Ono was a CIA plot to neutralize the Marxist threat that Lennon posed. < /tinfoil >
30 posted on
12/20/2006 6:11:22 AM PST by
EricT.
(The Republicans got fired for poor performance. 12 years and that's all they did?!?)
To: ShadowDancer
Imagine you're a limo lib.
married to a battle ax
And you hate the country to which you immigrated
So you wouldn't have to pay a tax.
You may say he's a schemer
Well, you're not the only one.
31 posted on
12/20/2006 6:12:51 AM PST by
Tribune7
(Conservatives hold bad behavior against their leaders. Dims don't.)
To: ShadowDancer
The newly released documents include a surveillance report stating that two prominent British leftists had courted Lennon in hopes that he would finance "a left-wing bookshop and reading room in London" but that Lennon gave them no money. "But if you want money for people with pictures of Chairman Mao, you ain't gonna make it with anyone, anyhow."---John Lennon on Revolution.
35 posted on
12/20/2006 6:20:51 AM PST by
subterfuge
(Today, Tolerance =greatest virtue;Hypocrisy=worst character defect; Discrimination =worst atrocity)
To: ShadowDancer
Another page states that there was "no certain proof" that Lennon had provided money "for subversive purposes." Imagine there's no substance. It's easy if you spy.
To: ShadowDancer
44 posted on
12/20/2006 6:33:56 AM PST by
Hatteras
To: ShadowDancer
I'm actually rather glad to see this.
I don't like the guy's politics, but if he wasn't that involved, I can't hate him any more than the liberal down the street.
OTOH, apparently they only investigated for 2 years. Doesn't mean things were not happening earlier or later.
49 posted on
12/20/2006 6:43:56 AM PST by
the OlLine Rebel
(Common sense is an uncommon virtue.)
To: ShadowDancer
Other than Bob Dylan, has anyone in history parlayed tone deafness into more musical fame than John Lennon?
To: ShadowDancer
I would rather know about John Kerry and his FBI file from that era.
To: ShadowDancer
Wow ... so many negative comments about John Lennon.
I must be a spy ... or a closet socialist ... or a commie or something ... I had the audacity to have been discharged from my three year Army stint in 1967 and entered pschodelia, drugs, mini skirts, sex, sex, drugs and sex and the Beatles and the Stones and ...
enjoyed just about every friggin' minute of it.!
Hell ... every friggin' group back then was some kind of political ... it was the friggin' 60's ferKrisake!
Angst ! You're all pissed off because you missed 'em .... heh heh heh.
And we can't tell you .... ya' had to have been there.
54 posted on
12/20/2006 7:12:02 AM PST by
knarf
(Islamists kill each other ... News wall-to-wall, 24/7 .. don't touch that dial.)
To: ShadowDancer
"nothing indicating government officials considered the former Beatle a serious threat"
Smoking dope don't make you much of threat.
61 posted on
12/20/2006 7:56:24 AM PST by
caver
(Yes, I did crawl out of a hole in the ground.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson