Skip to comments.
Cheney to be defense witness in CIA leak case
Breitbart.com from Drudge ^
| December 19, 2006
| Matt Apuzzo
Posted on 12/19/2006 12:02:21 PM PST by seanmerc
Cheney to Be Defense Witness in CIA Case Dec 19 2:54 PM US/Eastern
By MATT APUZZO Associated Press Writer
WASHINGTON
Vice President Dick Cheney will be called as a defense witness in the CIA leak case, an attorney for Cheney's former chief of staff told a federal judge Tuesday. "We're calling the vice president," attorney Ted Wells said in court. Wells represents defendant I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby, who is charged with perjury and obstruction.
Early last week, Special Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald said he did not expect the White House to resist if Cheney or other administration officials are called to testify in Libby's trial, expected to begin in January.
Libby is accused of lying to investigators about what he told reporters regarding former CIA operative Valerie Plame. Plame's identity was leaked to reporters around the time that her husband, former ambassador Joseph Wilson, publicly criticized the Bush administration's prewar intelligence on Iraq.
In addition to Cheney, other government officials and journalists are expected to be key witnesses in the trial, which is scheduled to start next month.
Former New York Times reporter Judith Miller and NBC News Washington bureau chief Tim Russert are expected to be prosecution witnesses. Libby's lawyers said in court papers that several reporters will testify on Libby's behalf.
Two unidentified reporters may resist testifying, Libby's attorneys said, but they expect to resolve that issue before trial.
Libby also has sought a subpoena for the tape of Washington Post reporter Bob Woodward's interview with former Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage. Armitage has admitted he discussed Plame's job with Woodward in 2003 but said it was a passing, inadvertent comment.
If admitted into evidence, the tape could be played at trial. The tape has been turned over to prosecutors, and Libby's attorneys said they expect no objection to their subpoena.
TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: armitage; cheney; cialeak; joewilson; libby; nbc; nbcnews; novak; plame; russert; scooter; veep; whataboutsandyberger
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81 next last
1
posted on
12/19/2006 12:02:22 PM PST
by
seanmerc
To: A Citizen Reporter; AliVeritas; alnick; AmeriBrit; AmericaUnited; arasina; BlessedByLiberty; ...
Scooter Ping!!!
2
posted on
12/19/2006 12:04:33 PM PST
by
Howlin
To: seanmerc
They'll claim Executive and or National Security privilege to try and quash the subpoena.
3
posted on
12/19/2006 12:04:42 PM PST
by
Keith in Iowa
(Liberals: First to demand tolerance, last to practice it when conservatives disagree with them.)
To: Keith in Iowa
I wish they wouldn't.
We need something "fun" to do in the winter, don't we? :-)
4
posted on
12/19/2006 12:06:19 PM PST
by
Howlin
To: seanmerc
Next to the Duke Rape case, this has got to be the stupidest case the courts are wasting their time on.
To: Howlin
Two unidentified reporters may resist testifying, Libby's attorneys said, but they expect to resolve that issue before trial Still resisting, huh?
Guess they don't want to go under oath and tell their story
6
posted on
12/19/2006 12:08:41 PM PST
by
Mo1
(Thank You Mr & Mrs "I'm gonna teach you a lesson" Voter ... you just screwed us on so many levels)
To: Howlin
Maybe there will a piece of paper in Scooter's stocking next week.
7
posted on
12/19/2006 12:09:00 PM PST
by
Perdogg
(Check out my Christmas Greetings at my Freep homepage)
To: seanmerc
Wow.
This has the possibility to get really ugly really fast.
8
posted on
12/19/2006 12:10:16 PM PST
by
highball
("I never should have switched from scotch to martinis." -- the last words of Humphrey Bogart)
To: seanmerc
9
posted on
12/19/2006 12:17:44 PM PST
by
dead
(I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
To: seanmerc
Cheney should just take Fitz out on a hunting trip to discuss all of this.
10
posted on
12/19/2006 12:23:17 PM PST
by
My2Cents
(In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. -- George Orwell)
To: Mo1
They'll need to not want to go to jail like Judith in order to quit resisting.
11
posted on
12/19/2006 12:24:32 PM PST
by
txhurl
To: seanmerc
No biggy. The defense will get to question Miller and Russert on cross before Cheney testifies and all they have to ask them is if they had ever talked to Armitage before ever talking to Libby. If they say they had then that's reasonable doubt about Libby lied about being the first to disclose the info. If Russert, Miller or any other reporter try for the 5th then it's a he said they won't say, case tossed.
12
posted on
12/19/2006 12:27:10 PM PST
by
tobyhill
(The War on Terrorism is not for the weak.)
To: Mo1
All I want for Christmas is for it to be Russert.
13
posted on
12/19/2006 12:29:03 PM PST
by
Howlin
To: seanmerc
14
posted on
12/19/2006 12:29:26 PM PST
by
Palladin
("Open a new window; open a new door; travel a new highway.")
To: Mo1
Still resisting, huh?
Guess they don't want to go under oath and tell their story
It'd be a dadgummed shame if their names were leaked.
15
posted on
12/19/2006 12:31:00 PM PST
by
A Balrog of Morgoth
(With fire, sword, and stinging whip I drive the RINOs in terror before me.)
To: Mo1
My guess is David Corn is one of them and he's resisting because he's going to have to expose the real leaker's who's probably in the CIA.
16
posted on
12/19/2006 12:34:43 PM PST
by
tobyhill
(The War on Terrorism is not for the weak.)
To: seanmerc
I have two words: What case?
17
posted on
12/19/2006 12:38:35 PM PST
by
AmishDude
(I coined "Senator Ass" to describe Jim Webb. He may have already used it as a character in a novel.)
To: tobyhill
Two unidentified reporters may resist testifying, Libby's attorneys said, but they expect to resolve that issue before trial. What could those two reporters possibly want, you think?
18
posted on
12/19/2006 12:45:48 PM PST
by
txhurl
To: seanmerc
How about an investigation into whether Tim Russert committed perjury?
To: seanmerc
Its all going to fall apart soon... hahaha millions of wasted taxpayer dollars.
20
posted on
12/19/2006 12:59:52 PM PST
by
tomnbeverly
(RATS 2008 platform is all about HOPE! GOP should run ad fetus says HOPE my mom is a conservative.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson