Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Watchdog: Firm nearly detonated nuke bomb (1.2 megaton bomb near Amarillo)
Arizona Daily Star | Cox News Service ^ | 12/15/06 | Jeff Nesmith

Posted on 12/16/2006 7:11:23 PM PST by LibWhacker

WASHINGTON — An accident that occurred as a decades-old nuclear warhead was being dismantled at the government's Pantex facility near Amarillo, Texas, could have caused the device to detonate, a nonprofit organization charged Thursday.

The Project on Government Oversight said the "near miss" event, which led the Energy Department to fine the plant's operator $110,000, was due partly to requirements that technicians at the plant work up to 72 hours per week.

The Pantex plant, 17 miles northeast of Amarillo, is the country's only factory for assembly and disassembly of nuclear weapons.

The organization said it was told by unidentified experts who were "knowledgeable about this event" that the accident, in which an unsafe amount of pressure was applied to the warhead, could have caused the device to detonate.

The oversight project also released an anonymous letter, purportedly sent by Pantex employees, warning that long hours and efforts to increase output were causing dangerous conditions in the plant.

In a two-paragraph statement, BWX Technologies, the company that operates the Amarillo facility under a contract with the Energy Department, said it "takes seriously any employee concerns about safe operations" and was comparing statements in the anonymous letter "with the reality of day-to-day work."

BWX spokeswoman Erin Ritter declined to comment beyond the statement.

Julianne Smith, a spokeswoman for the Energy Department, which owns the Pantex plant, declined to respond to safety complaints outlined in a letter from oversight project Executive Director Danielle Brian to Energy Secretary Samuel Bodman.

However, records show that the department last month fined BWX $110,000 for the accident and another event involving the same warhead.

In a letter to Dan J. Swaim, BWX general manger of the plant, the Energy Department said the company had "significantly delayed" disclosing the incidents and then submitted a "factually inaccurate and incomplete" report.

The letter, signed by Linton Brooks, head of the National Nuclear Security Administration, did not say the incidents could have caused a nuclear detonation or what kind of warhead was being dismantled when they occurred.

It said that during three separate unsuccessful attempts to dismantle the warhead in March and April of last year, workers applied too much pressure to the device and a safety mechanism failed to work.

Oversight project investigator Peter Stockton, a former Energy Department official, said the device was a W56 warhead, with a yield of 1,200 kilotons, 100 times the destructive power of the Hiroshima bomb.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: 2005; 200503; 200504; amarillo; detonated; dismantle; holidayinnexpress; isolatedincidents; leak; leftwingnuts; nuclear; nuclearwarhead; nuke; oops; pantex; peterdhstockton; peterstockton; pogo; security; w56; warhead; weapon; wmd; wmds; yperbole
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-112 next last
To: Sir Francis Dashwood
also there seems to be a security leak...

Nothing new about that in this day and age.

21 posted on 12/16/2006 7:29:37 PM PST by COEXERJ145 (Bush Derangement Syndrome Has Reached Pandemic Levels on Free Republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
The Project on Government Oversight

www.pogo.org is somewhat biased in their views.

22 posted on 12/16/2006 7:30:23 PM PST by Enosh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COEXERJ145
Yeah, I tend to question this as well. A nuke just don't go BOOM because someone beats on it, kicks it, or worse. Fully armed nuclear weapons have survived impact with the ground when accidentally released from tens of thousands of feet and none every went nuclear.

Quite right. The high explosive trigger (which may be several tens of pounds, if not hundreds) is the real danger.

23 posted on 12/16/2006 7:32:26 PM PST by buccaneer81 (Bob Taft has soiled the family name for the next century.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
The organization said it was told by unidentified experts who were "knowledgeable about this event" that the accident, in which an unsafe amount of pressure was applied to the warhead, could have caused the device to detonate.

I would like to wait until all the facts come in.


24 posted on 12/16/2006 7:32:26 PM PST by operation clinton cleanup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COEXERJ145

Another Clinton legacy...


25 posted on 12/16/2006 7:32:36 PM PST by Sir Francis Dashwood (LET'S ROLL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

RElated article.

Last W56 Minuteman Warheads Dismantled, (June 29, 2006)

http://www.phillyburbs.com/pb-dyn/news/27-06292006-677660.html


The Energy Department said Thursday it has completed dismantling the last W56 warhead that for 30 years, beginning in the early 1960s, was the deadly core of the Minuteman I, and later the updated Minuteman II long-range missile.

"Dismantling the last W56 warhead shows our firm commitment to reducing the size of the nation's nuclear weapons stockpile to the lowest level necessary for national security needs," said Linton Brooks, head of the National Nuclear Security Administration.


26 posted on 12/16/2006 7:32:47 PM PST by Pontiac (All are worthy of freedom, none are incapable.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Criminal Number 18F; Ben Mugged

Yes, highly doubtful, I agree. Also telling that few media outlets have run with it, despite being liberal as he**.


27 posted on 12/16/2006 7:32:47 PM PST by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

I smell bullsh!t. They don't just "go off".


28 posted on 12/16/2006 7:34:06 PM PST by lesser_satan (EKTHELTHIOR!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SteveMcKing

""Pantex"... that's some woman-thing, right?"

It, and Amarillo, are located in the Texas panhandle. You decide.


29 posted on 12/16/2006 7:35:13 PM PST by gcruse (http://garycruse.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

30 posted on 12/16/2006 7:36:11 PM PST by Andy from Beaverton (I'm so anti-pc, I use a Mac)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: operation clinton cleanup

What was meant by "detonate" was likely the HE trigger going off, not the whole thing detonating, I'm sure.


31 posted on 12/16/2006 7:36:14 PM PST by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

I agree with some other posters. I would consider the source, and this looks like BS.


32 posted on 12/16/2006 7:37:31 PM PST by rlmorel (Islamofacism: It is all fun and games until someone puts an eye out. Or chops off a head.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
'..workers applied too much pressure to the device and a safety mechanism failed to work.

Everybody knows you got to soak the hell out of'em.

33 posted on 12/16/2006 7:37:56 PM PST by Leisler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pontiac

In light of difficulties with stuck threads on the W56 warhead radiation case, the staff reviewed the W56 WSS for historical data that could provide insight on this problem. This review was augmented by observations of the staff and the Board’s outside expert of interactions between the W56 Project Team and Y-12 staff with expertise in bimetallic joints. The surveillance history summary in the WSS provides a list of Unsatisfactory Reports and SFIs and states that none of these were safety-related. This summary fails to disclose a worker safety issue related to a fire hazard that is documented in the Y-12 hazard analysis and could be relevant to safety at the Pantex Plant.

Given that the W56 was in the stockpile for more than 25 years, one would expect a historical overview of the type and characteristics of the tooling used during the life of the program. Archival information of this nature would have been helpful in safety reviews of the modern tooling developed under the SS-21 process for W56 dismantlement. In addition, any SFI reports of operational difficulties related to the bimetallic joint would have provided additional insight, even if they had not been classified as safety-related when they were written. Finally, a more thorough effort to document the experiences of Pantex Production Technicians would have been helpful in identifying potential pitfalls.

http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/systems/w56.htm


34 posted on 12/16/2006 7:40:30 PM PST by Vn_survivor_67-68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Ben Mugged

"and it will not explode with other than he non-nuclear high explosive in the weapon."

Of course, if you carelessly toss a lit cigarette and it hits that non-nuclear high explosive...;)


35 posted on 12/16/2006 7:41:18 PM PST by Frank_2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Unidentified kind of sums it up, my BS detector just went off.


36 posted on 12/16/2006 7:41:21 PM PST by boomop1 (there you go again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Here's the problem

The Project On Government Oversight
A non-partisan non-profit government watchdog whose mission is to investigate, expose, and remedy abuses of power, mismanagement, and government ...
www.pogo.org/ - 30k - Cached - Similar pages


37 posted on 12/16/2006 7:44:12 PM PST by Vn_survivor_67-68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COEXERJ145
Nope, Pantex is the only one left. You can thank Bill Clinton for that.

Yeah, but think of the benefits! If they are the only shop left, you don't have to worry about that "Oh, we were really looking for somebody with more experience" line when applying for that Nuclear Bomb Dismantler job."

38 posted on 12/16/2006 7:46:36 PM PST by kittycatonline.com
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Strategerist
I was a AMMO troop in the Air Force and was trained on EDM. Setting off a warhead by accident is NOT possible!


39 posted on 12/16/2006 7:47:24 PM PST by operation clinton cleanup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Frank_2001
Of course, if you carelessly toss a lit cigarette and it hits that non-nuclear high explosive

Actually you can set this stuff on fire and it will just burn with an oily smoke. If you cover it however with anything, like sand or your foot, it will explode and leave quite a large hole in the ground and spread pieces of you over a large piece of landscape.

40 posted on 12/16/2006 7:47:24 PM PST by Ben Mugged (Always cheat; always win. The only unfair fight is the one you lose.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-112 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson