Hopefully Reason will prevail, and the Space Stewardesses will look something more like this:
Posted on 12/16/2006 11:11:41 AM PST by Stoat
WASHINGTON - Thrill-seekers looking to blast into space would need to be informed in writing of serious risks — including death — and promise not to sue the government under the first-ever rules for commercial space travel.
The rules issued Friday by the Federal Aviation Administration mandate training and medical fitness evaluations for crew members, preflight testing and other steps companies must take before getting licenses to carry paying passengers into the beyond.
The rules apply to American companies launching from anywhere in the world, and to foreign companies launching from U.S. soil.
Virgin Galactic, run by British entrepreneur Richard Branson, is aiming to offer out-of-this-world vacations in 2008 for travelers willing to pay $200,000 apiece. Space Adventures Ltd. of Vienna, Va., is making similar plans, as are other outfits.
The FAA regulations were required under legislation Congress passed two years ago, in the wake of the successful 2004 flights of a privately financed manned rocket over California's Mojave Desert.
For now, the flights aren't required to be safe for passengers. Lawmakers were concerned that safety requirements would hamper innovation in the infant industry, and settled on informed consent for the early years of paid space travel. The FAA was given the authority to begin regulating for passenger safety in eight years, or if an accident causing serious injury or death happened before then.
"Private human space flight will be an unparalleled adventure," said FAA Administrator Marion C. Blakey. "In an environment where some level of risk will always be present, this action underscores the FAA's firm commitment to public safety."
The entrepreneurs competing to fly people into space have been pushing for the rules to establish a legal framework for their ventures. There are already rules for private-sector space endeavors such as satellite launches, but until now, no legal jurisdiction for regulating commercial human spaceflight.
"One of the key priorities here is regulatory certainty. Investors and engineers and spaceport operators all want to know ahead of time what the rules are that we're going to be dealing with here," said Rich Pournelle, director of business development at XCOR Aerospace, a launch vehicle developer in California that's working with Space Adventures.
Under the new rules, which take effect Feb. 13, companies will be required to be insured. Passengers must be informed in writing about the risks of the vehicle type they're using, and that space travel in general carries the risk of death or serious injury. No limitations are imposed on who can be a space tourist, but basic training for passengers must be provided.
Existing rules for commercial space travel aim to the ensure safety for people on the ground, including by restricting flights over heavily populated areas.
Hopefully Reason will prevail, and the Space Stewardesses will look something more like this:
FAA full employment act.
I agree, Hell they cant even look after what is going on here on earth.
Can't let any upstarts interfere with NASA's monopoly on American space efforts, can we??
BTW, Where is the FAA mandated by the Constitution?
Oh, I'm sorry, I forgot that the Constitution is only there for the Feds to pay lip-service to while the bastards in DC regulate, regulate, regulate.
Yep. The unelected, unaccountable bureaucrats in DC really do think of themselves as Gods.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.