[Fascist] Pelosi Targets Grassroots Freedom of Speech

Human Events ^ | Dec 18, 2006 | Amanda B. Carpenter

[Jim Robinson]

House Speaker-to-be Nancy Pelosi (D.-Calif.) has pledged to take up a lobbying reform proposal that would impose new regulations on speech by grassroots organizations, while providing a loophole in the rules for large corporations and labor unions.

The legislation would make changes to the legal definition of “grassroots lobbying” and require any organization that encourages 500 or more members of the general public to contact their elected representatives to file a report with detailed information about their organization to the government on a quarterly basis.

The report would include identifying the organization’s expenditures, the issues focused on and the members of Congress and other federal officials who are the subject of the advocacy efforts. A separate report would be required for each policy issue the group is active on.

“Right now, grassroots groups don’t have to report at all if they are communicating with the public,” said Dick Dingman of the Free Speech Coalition, Inc. “This is an effort that would become a major attack on the 1st Amendment.”

Under the bill, communications aimed at an organization’s members, employees, officers or shareholders would be exempt from the reporting requirement. That would effectively exempt most corporations, trade associations and unions from the reporting requirements—but not most conservative grassroots groups, which frequently are less formally organized.

Larger, well-funded organizations are also currently eligible for a “low-dollar lobbyist exemption” that Pelosi’s bill does not give to grassroots organizations. If an organization retains a lobbyist to contact lawmakers directly at a cost of $2,500 per quarter or less, or employs a full-time lobbyist at a cost of $10,000 per quarter or less, the organization does not have to report to the government.

Public Citizen, a liberal “government watchdog,” is taking credit for helping Pelosi craft the legislation and expects the final draft of the bill to closely resemble Pelosi’s Honest Leadership and Open Government Act of 2006, which contains these provisions.

Craig Holman, a lobbyist for Public Citizen, said the changes would help “streamline” how grassroots organizations are regulated by the IRS and other laws. Public Citizen would like Congress to adopt the IRS’s definition of “lobbying,” which includes communication that encourages the general public to contact a member of Congress on pending legislation or public policy.

“The IRS has a definition that requires all organizations, including non-profits, to file as a part of our tax returns,” Holman said. “When it comes to the election code and the lobbying disclosure act, they have no definition of grassroots lobbying. It’s excluded from everything. The IRS has a definition of grassroots lobbying, but their information is not publicly reported. It’s just our tax returns to the IRS.”

Suzanne Coffman, director of communication for Guidestar.org, which makes IRS 990 forms available on the Internet, said any secular, non-profit organization that has more than $25,000 in income per year is required by law to make the last three years worth of tax forms available upon request. “We get them directly from the IRS, and we have more than two million 990s online” said Coffman. “For non-charitable organizations, like private charities or private foundations, we have fewer because the IRS began scanning those only in April 2005. They focused on charitable organizations, which make up the bulk of exempt organizations, because those are the ones that accept tax-deductible contributions. The need for accountability is much higher with them than with other types of organizations which are sort of subsidized by the taxpayer because they federally are tax exempt, but not like a charity is.”

Public Citizen’s public IRS 990 disclosure forms show that it raised more than $3 million in 2005. That year, the group spent $297, 431 on mail and $178,182 on consulting and professional fees.

A coalition of grassroots organizers, including David Keene of the American Conservative Union, Larry Pratt of Gun Owners of America and Terrence Scanlon of the Capitol Research Center, have written an open letter calling on Public Citizen to renounce its efforts, which they called “flawed to the point of hypocrisy.”

“This bill would apply to those who have no Washington-based lobbyists, who provide no money or gifts to members of Congress, and who merely seek to speak, associate and petition the government,” it said. “Regulating the speech, publishing, association and petitioning rights of citizens is not targeted at corruption in Washington, as Public Citizen and its supporters would believe. Instead, it is targeted directly at the 1st-Amendment rights of citizens and their voluntary associations.”

The Lobbying Transparency and Accountability Act, which made some of these changes, was actually approved by both the House and the Senate in the 109th Congress, but failed to make it through a conference committee.

To help dramatize the bill this time around, Pelosi is planning to assign sponsorship of various amendments to incoming freshman, which they will promote in their maiden House floor speeches.

Current law prevents former members of Congress and senior staff as well as senior executive staff from lobbying for one year. Pelosi’s proposal would extend that to two years and completely ban members and staff from accepting gifts, meals and privately sponsored travel.

Miss Carpenter is Assistant Editor for HUMAN EVENTS. She is the author of "The Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy's Dossier on Hillary Rodham Clinton," published by Regnery (a HUMAN EVENTS sister company).

[Quix]

Certainly we need prayer to save it as long as possible.

It is clear from Scripture that the evil world ruler will rule for 3.5-7 years . . .

but I still think that prayer can cause God to show Himself very strong in our behalf. Of course, that presumes we Christians are living lives such that our prayers tend to be heard and answered. God doesn't respond well to those called by His name who engage in mostly lip service to Him.

[onyx]

Like I posted on that silly thread, "follow the money" --- Bob Barr sold out long ago --- to the ACLU to name one organization he joined.

[Quix]

We have a prayer thread for our nation and leaders everyday.
= = =

True, true, true.

[onyx]

Woo-Hoo!

[Arizona Carolyn]

We have one, Newt, but too many hold his personal life against him. He was on Sean today and he definitely "gets it."

[You Dirty Rats]

The one idiot keeps posting to himself.

I didn't stay long -- breathing in all of the pot smoke eminating from the Losertarians would make me hungry and I don't need to eat more food tonight.

[onyx]

LOL -- I know exactly the idiot you mean... hope s/he comes to this thread. I am saving a specail "reply" for "it."

[PSYCHO-FREEP]

You mean "Conservative voices" like Barr? That sure worked well didn't it.....

[xzins]

I agree.

Right now Newt is at the top of my list. He has some personal issues, but everyone has to get forgiven after a while.

His ability with the media is better than anyone else, and his conservative credentials are unquestionable.

Gopac will get cash.

[Arizona Carolyn]

I would pay good money to watch New debate Hillary.

[xzins]

I don't understand your comment. Can you explain?

[Arizona Carolyn]

I understand what you are saying.

[You Dirty Rats]

He's about a lake short of a state.

[jdm]

I would pay good money to watch New debate Hillary.

Stick around for a couple years and you probably will see it for free.

[onyx]

FOTFLOL -- that's the one!

[NormsRevenge]

It's time for another round of 'Spot the Loonie'.

US President George W. Bush (R) at a meeting 8 December in the White House with the Bicameral Bipartisan Leadership on the Iraq Study Group Report including House Speaker elect Nancy Pelosi (L) and outgoing Speaker of the House Dennis Hastert. Bush begins a new series of consultations on Iraq after a shock-therapy indictment of his conduct of the war by an "independent" policy commission. Photo:Tim Sloan/AFP

---

Incoming U.S. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) makes a point during a news conference about her plans for the first 100 hours of the new congress at the Capitol in Washington, December 14, 2006. REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst (UNITED STATES)

[dmw]

"Will somebody PLEASE tell me again how Republicans aren't any different than Democrats?"

Perhaps leadpenny could give us some insight on that.

[BuffaloJack]

Pelosi and her friends are simple the enemy within.

[Jim Robinson]

I'd go for Newt in a New York minute over Rudy. Or over Mitt, Benedict Arnold McCaine, et al.

[PSYCHO-FREEP]

You pretty much implied that you were a non-vote until a "Conservative" was offered on the ballot.